Observers can reliably identify illusory flashes in the illusory flash paradigm

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 226, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 73-79

  Van Erp, Jan B F ^a   Philippi, Tom G ^a,b   Werkhoven, Peter ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Flash fission illusion; Flash fusion illusion; Multisensory interaction; Sound; Touch; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORCED CHOICE METHOD; HUMAN; ILLUSION; ILLUSORY FLASH; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875451110     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: 14321106     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3413-8     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andersen TS, Tiippana K, Sams M (2004) Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions. Cognitive Brain Res 21:301-308
2. Bresciani J-P, Dammeier F, Ernst MO (2006) Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. J Vis 6:554-564
3. Bresciani J-P, Dammeier F, Ernst MO (2008) Tri-modal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events. Brain Res Bull 75:753-760
4. Keetels M, Vroomen J (2005) The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments. Exp Brain Res 167:635-640
5. McCormick D, Mamassian P (2008) What does the illusory flash look like? Vision Res 48:63-69
6. Mishra J, Martinez A, Sejnowski TJ, Hillyard SA (2007) Early cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. J Neurosci 27(15):4120-4131
7. Philippi TG, van Erp JBF, Werkhoven P (2008) Multisensory temporal numerosity judgment. Brain Res 1242:116-125
8. Philippi TG, van Erp JBF, Werkhoven P (2010) Is the touch-induced illusory flash distinguishable from a real flash? Lect Notes Comput Sci 6192:406-411
9. Philippi TG, Van Erp JBF, Werkhoven P (2011) Multisensory effects differ for counting small and large pulse numbers. See Perceiving 24(6):565-578
10. Rosenthal O, Shimojo S, Shams L (2009) Sound-induced flash illusion is resistant to feed-back training. Brain Topogr 21:185-192
11. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) What you see is what you hear. Nature 408:788
12. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Thompson S, Shimojo S (2001) Sound alters visual evoked potential in humans. NeuroReport 12(17):3849-3852
13. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2002) Visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Res 14:147-152
14. Shams L, Iwaki S, Chawla A, Bhattacharya J (2005) Early modulation of the visual cortex by sound: an MEG study. Neurosci Lett 378:76-81
15. Stein BE, Meredith MA (1993) The merging of the senses. MIT Press, Cambridge
16. Van Erp JBF, Spapé MMA (2008) Time-shrinking and the design of tactons. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 5024 LNCS, pp 289-294
17. Van Erp JBF, Werkhoven P (2004) Vibro-tactile and visual asynchronies: sensitivity and consistency. Perception 33(1):103-111
18. Violentyev A, Shimojo S, Shams L (2005) Touch-induced visual illusion. NeuroReport 16(10):1107-1110
19. Vroomen J, Keetels M, de Gelder B, Bertelson P (2004) Recalibration of temporal order perception by exposure to audiovisual asynchrony. Cognitive Brain Res 22:32-35
20. Werkhoven P, Van Erp JBF, Philippi TG (2009) Counting visual and tactile events: the effect of attention on multisensory integration. Atten Percept Psychophy 71(8):1854-1861