Counting visual and tactile events: The effect of attention on multisensory integration

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 71, Issue 8, 2009, Pages 1854-1861

  Werkhoven, Peter J ^a   Van Erp, Jan B F ^b   Philippi, Tom G ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILLUSION; LEARNING; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TOUCH; VISION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SERIAL LEARNING; TOUCH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75549090661     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1854     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANDERSEN, T. S., TUPPANA, K., & SAMS, M. (2004). Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusions. Cognitive Brain Research, 21, 301-308.
2. ANDERSEN, T. S., TUPPANA, K., & SAMS, M. (2005). Maximum likelihood integration of rapid flashes and beeps. Neuroscience Letters, 380, 155-160.
3. Buss, J. C., CRANE, H. D., MANSFIELD, P. K., & TOWNSEND, J. T. (1966). Information available in brief tactile presentations. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 273-283.
4. BRESCIANI, J.-P., DAMMETER, F., & ERNST, M. O. (2006). Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. Journal of Vision, 6, 554-564.
5. BRESCIANI, J.-P., DAMMETER, F., & ERNST, M. O. (2008). Trimodal integration of visual, tactile and auditory signals for the perception of sequences of events. Brain Research Bulletin, 75, 753-760.
6. BRESCIANI, J.-P., ERNST, M. O., DREWING, K., BOUYER, G., MAURY, V., & KHEDDAR, A. (2005). Feeling what you hean Auditory signals can modulate tactile tap perception. Experimental Brain Research, 162, 172-180.
7. COURTNEY, J. R., MOTES, M. A., & HUBBARD, T. L. (2007). Multi- and unisensory visual flash illusions. Perception, 36, 516-524.
8. ERNST, M. O., BRESCIANI, J.-P., DREWING, K., & BOLTHOFF, H. H. (2004). Integration of sensory information within touch and across modalities. In Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2004), 1-2(10 2004).
9. ERNST, M. O., & BOLTHOFF, H. H. (2004). Merging the senses into a robust percept Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 162-169.
10. FECHNER, G. T. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Hartel.
11. GALLACE, A., TAN, H. Z., HAGGARD, P., & SPENCE, C. (2008). Shortterm memory for tactile stimuli. Brain Research, 1190, 132-142.
12. GALLACE, A., TAN, H. Z., & SPENCE, C. (2007). Multisensory numerosity judgments for visual and tactile stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 487-501.
13. GRIFFIN, I. C., & NOBRE, A. G (2003). Orienting attention to locations in internal representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 1176-1194.
14. GUEST, S., & SPENCE, C. (2003). Tactile dominance in speeded discrimination of textures. Experimental Brain Research, 150, 201-207.
15. HELBIG, H. B., & ERNST, M. O. (2008). Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention. Journal of Vislon, 8, 1-16.
16. HOTTING, K., & RÖDER, B. (2004). Hearing cheats touch, but less in congenitally blind than in sighted individuais. Psychological Science, 15, 60-64.
17. KÖRDINO, K. P., BEIERHOLM, U. [R], MA, W. J., QUARTZ, S., TENENBAUM, J. B., & SHAMS, L. (2007). Causal inference in multisensory perception. PLoS ONE, 2, e943.
18. MATSUKURA, M., LUCK, S. J., & VECERA, S. P. (2007). Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 1422-1434.
19. MIXES, C., & BORTHWICK, H. (1996). Tactile short-term memory revisited. Memory, 4, 655-668.
20. Pmuppi, T., VAN ERP, J. B. F., & WERKHOVEN, P. J. (2008). Multisensory temporal numerosity judgment. Brain Research, 1242, 116-125. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.05.056
21. ROACH, N. W., HERON, J., & MCGRAW, P. V. (2006). Resolving multisensory conflict A strategy for balancing the costs and benefits of audio-visual integration. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 2159-2168.
22. SATO, Y., TOYOIZUMI, T., & AIHARA, K. (2007). Bayesian inference explains perception of unity and ventriloquism aftereffect Identification of common sources of audiovisual stimuli Neural Computation, 19, 3335-3355.
23. SHAMS, L., KAMTTANI, Y., & SHJMOJO, S. (2000). What you see is what you hear. Nature, 408, 788.
24. SHAMS, L., KAMITANI, Y., & SIDMOJO, S. (2002). A visual illusion induced by sound. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 147-152.
25. SHAMS, L., MA, W. J., & BEIERHOLM, U. [R.] (2005). Sound-induced flash illusion as an optimal percept NeuroReport, 16, 1923-1927.
26. SPENCE, C., NICHOLLS, M. E. R., & DRIVER, J. (2001). The cost of expecting events in the wrong sensory modality. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 330-336.
27. SPENCE, C., SHORE, D. L, & KLEIN, R. M. (2001). Multisensory prior entry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 799-832.
28. SPERLING, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 74, 1-29.
29. VIOLENTYEV, A., SHTMOJO, S., & SHAMS, L. (2005). Touch-induced visual illusion. NeuroReport, 16, 1107-1110.
30. WELCH, R. B., & WARREN, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638-667.
31. WOZNY, D. R., BEIERHOLM, U. R., & SHAMS, L. (2008). Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. Journal of Vision, 8, 1-11.