Relationship between intravascular ultrasound parameters and fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary artery stenosis of left anterior descending artery: Intravascular ultrasound volumetric analysis

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 386-394

  Yang, Hyoung Mo ^a   Tahk, Seung Jea ^a   Lim, Hong Seok ^a   Yoon, Myeong Ho ^a   Choi, So Yeon ^a   Choi, Byoung Joo ^a   Jin, Xiong Jie ^a   Hwang, Gyo Seung ^a   Park, Jin Sun ^a   Shin, Joon Han ^a  

^a Ajou University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

fractional flow reserve; intravascular ultrasound; plaque volume

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; AGED; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; CORONARY VESSELS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; HYPEREMIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PLAQUE, ATHEROSCLEROTIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; VASODILATOR AGENTS;

EID: 84893450138     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.25088     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Takagi A, Tsurumi Y, Ishii Y, Suzuki K, Kawana M, Kasanuki H,. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: Relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 1999; 100: 250-255.
2. Briguori C, Anzuini A, Airoldi F, et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87: 136-141.
3. Ben-Dor I, Torguson R, Gaglia MA Jr, et al. Correlation between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound lumen area in intermediate coronary artery stenosis. EuroIntervention 2011; 7: 225-233.
4. Kang SJ, Lee JY, Ahn JM, et al. Validation of intravascular ultrasound-derived parameters with fractional flow reserve for assessment of coronary stenosis severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 65-71.
5. Koo BK, Yang HM, Doh JH, et al. Optimal intravascular ultrasound criteria and their accuracy for defining the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses of different locations. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 803-811.
6. Nicholls SJ, Hsu A, Wolski K, et al. Intravascular ultrasound-derived measures of coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55: 2399-2407.
7. Austen WG, Edwards JE, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5-40.
8. Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1478-1492.
9. Yoon MH, Tahk SJ, Yang HM, et al. Comparison of the intracoronary continuous infusion method using a microcatheter and the intravenous continuous adenosine infusion method for inducing maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 1050-1056.
10. Kolozsvári R, Tar B, Lugosi P, et al. Plaque volume derived from three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary angiography predicts the fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 2012; 160: 140-144.
11. Seiler C, Kirkeeide RL, Gould KL,. Basic structure-function relations of the epicardial coronary vascular tree. Basis of quantitative coronary arteriography for diffuse coronary artery disease. Circulation 1992; 85: 1987-2003.
12. Gould K,. Pressure-flow characteristics of coronary stenoses in unsedated dogs at rest and during coronary vasodilation. Circ Res 1978; 43: 242-253.
13. Spaan J, Piek J, Hoffman J, Siebes M,. Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices. Circulation 2006; 113: 446-455.
14. Abizaid A, Mintz GS, Pichard AD, et al. Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve: Before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 423-428.
15. Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Mehran R, et al. Long-term follow-up after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was not performed based on intravascular ultrasound findings: Importance of lumen dimensions. Circulation 1999; 100: 256-261.
16. Kristensen TS, Engstrøm T, Kelbæk H, von der Recke P, Nielsen MB, Kofoed KF,. Correlation between coronary computed tomographic angiography and fractional flow reserve. Int J Cardiol 2010; 144: 200-205.
17. Costa MA, Sabate M, Staico R, et al. Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: Final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial. Am Heart J 2007; 153: 296.e1-e7.