Anatomical and physiologic assessments in patients with small coronary artery disease: Final results of the Physiologic and Anatomical Evaluation Prior to and After Stent Implantation in Small Coronary Vessels (PHANTOM) trial

American Heart Journal

Volumn 153, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 296.e1-296.e7

  Costa, Marco A ^a   Sabate, Manel ^b   Staico, Rodolfo ^c   Alfonso, Fernando ^b   Seixas, Ana C ^c   Albertal, Mariano ^c   Crossman, Arthur ^a   Angiolillo, Dominick J ^a   Zenni, Martin ^a   Sousa, J Eduardo ^c   Macaya, Carlos ^b   Bass, Theodore A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA HEALTH JACKSONVILLE   (United States)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO SAN CARLOS   (Spain)

^c INSTITUTO DANTE PAZZANESE DE CARDIOLOGIA   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ADENOSINE; BETA ADRENERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; CLOPIDOGREL; HYDROXYMETHYLGLUTARYL COENZYME A REDUCTASE INHIBITOR; TICLOPIDINE; VASODILATOR AGENT;

ADULT; ANATOMY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; CALCULATION; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY HEMODYNAMICS; CORONARY STENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DEATH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVASCULARIZATION; SAFETY; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT DURATION;

EID: 33846290689     PISSN: 00028703     EISSN: 10976744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.10.036     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Pijls N.H., Van Gelder B., Van der Voort P., et al. Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow. Circulation 92 (1995) 3183-3193
2. Pijls N.H., De Bruyne B., Peels K., et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med 334 (1996) 1703-1708
3. Bech G.J., De Bruyne B., Pijls N.H., et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial. Circulation 103 (2001) 2928-2934
4. Legalery P., Schiele F., Seronde M.F., et al. One-year outcome of patients submitted to routine fractional flow reserve assessment to determine the need for angioplasty. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 2623-2629
5. Abizaid A.S., Mintz G.S., Abizaid A., et al. One-year follow-up after intravascular ultrasound assessment of moderate left main coronary artery disease in patients with ambiguous angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 34 (1999) 707-715
6. Abizaid A., Mintz G.S., Pichard A.D., et al. Clinical, intravascular ultrasound, and quantitative angiographic determinants of the coronary flow reserve before and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 82 (1998) 423-428
7. Takagi A., Tsurumi Y., Ishii Y., et al. Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Circulation 100 (1999) 250-255
8. Briguori C., Anzuini A., Airoldi F., et al. Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 87 (2001) 136-141
9. Moreno R., Fernandez C., Alfonso F., et al. Coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small vessels: a meta-analysis from 11 randomized studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 43 (2004) 1964-1972
10. Agostoni P., Biondi-Zoccai G.G., Gasparini G.L., et al. Is bare-metal stenting superior to balloon angioplasty for small vessel coronary artery disease? Evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 26 (2005) 881-889
11. Haase J., Escaned J., van Swijndregt E.M., et al. Experimental validation of geometric and densitometric coronary measurements on the new generation Cardiovascular Angiography Analysis System (CAAS II). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 30 (1993) 104-114
12. Anderson H.V., Stokes M.J., Leon M., et al. Coronary artery flow velocity is related to lumen area and regional left ventricular mass. Circulation 102 (2000) 48-54
13. Califf R.M., Phillips III H.R., Hindman M.C., et al. Prognostic value of a coronary artery jeopardy score. J Am Coll Cardiol 5 (1985) 1055-1063
14. Bruining N., Hamers R., Teo T.J., et al. Adjustment method for mechanical Boston Scientific Corporation 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound catheters connected to a Clearview console. Mechanical 30 MHz IVUS catheter adjustment. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20 (2004) 83-91
15. Hanekamp C.E., Koolen J.J., Pijls N.H., et al. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment. Circulation 99 (1999) 1015-1021
16. Bech G.J., DeBruyne B., Akasaka T., et al. Coronary pressure and FFR predict long-term outcome after PTCA. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent 4 (2001) 67-76
17. Moses J.W., Leon M.B., Popma J.J., et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N Engl J Med 349 (2003) 1315-1323
18. Stone G.W., Ellis S.G., Cox D.A., et al. A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 350 (2004) 221-231
19. Ardissino D., Cavallini C., Bramucci E., et al. Sirolimus-eluting vs uncoated stents for prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries: a randomized trial. JAMA 292 (2004) 2727-2734
20. Rodriguez-Granillo G.A., Valgimigli M., Garcia-Garcia H.M., et al. One-year clinical outcome after coronary stenting of very small vessels using 2.25 mm sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents: a comparison between the RESEARCH and T-SEARCH registries. J Invasive Cardiol 17 (2005) 409-412
21. McFadden E.P., Stabile E., Regar E., et al. Late thrombosis in drug-eluting coronary stents after discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy. Lancet 364 (2004) 1519-1521