Correlation between coronary computed tomographic angiography and fractional flow reserve

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 144, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 200-205

  Kristensen, Thomas Skaarup ^a   Engstrøm, Thomas ^a   Kelbæk, Henning ^a   Von Der Recke, Peter ^a   Nielsen, Michael Bachmann ^a   Kofoed, Klaus Fuglsang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77957923761     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.04.024     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. J. Abdulla, S.Z. Abildstrom, O. Gotzsche, E. Christensen, L. Kober, and C. Torp-Pedersen 64-multislice detector computed tomography coronary angiography as potential alternative to conventional coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Heart J 28 2007 3042 3050
2. R.C. Hendel, M.R. Patel, and C.M. Kramer ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/ SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American College of Radiology, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Interventional Radiology J Am Coll Cardiol 48 2006 1475 1497
3. S. Schroeder, S. Achenbach, and F. Bengel Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology Eur Heart J 29 2008 531 556
4. C. Musto, P. Simon, and E. Nicol 64-multislice computed tomography in consecutive patients with suspected or proven coronary artery disease: initial single center experience Int J Cardiol 114 2007 90 97
5. T. Dill, A. Deetjen, and O. Ekinci Radiation dose exposure in multislice computed tomography of the coronaries in comparison with conventional coronary angiography Int J Cardiol 124 2008 307 311
6. S. Busch, T.R. Johnson, and K. Nikolaou Visual and automatic grading of coronary artery stenoses with 64-slice CT angiography in reference to invasive angiography Eur Radiol 17 2007 1445 1451
7. R.C. Cury, E.V. Pomerantsev, and M. Ferencik Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography Am J Cardiol 96 2005 784 787
8. M. Dewey, W. Rutsch, D. Schnapauff, F. Teige, and B. Hamm Coronary artery stenosis quantification using multislice computed tomography Invest Radiol 42 2007 78 84 (Pubitemid 46104887)
9. A.W. Leber, A. Knez, and Z.F. von Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2005 147 154
10. J. Sun, Z. Zhang, and B. Lu Identification and quantification of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparison of 64-MDCT and intravascular ultrasound AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 2008 748 754
11. J. Bartunek, S.U. Sys, G.R. Heyndrickx, N.H. Pijls, and B.B. De Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort J Am Coll Cardiol 26 1995 328 334
12. M.A. Christou, G.C. Siontis, D.G. Katritsis, and J.P. Ioannidis Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia Am J Cardiol 99 2007 450 456
13. B.B. De, J. Bartunek, S.U. Sys, and G.R. Heyndrickx Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia Circulation 92 1995 39 46
14. N.H. Pijls, G.B. Van, and D. Van V Fractional flow reserve. A useful index to evaluate the influence of an epicardial coronary stenosis on myocardial blood flow Circulation 92 1995 3183 3193
15. N.H. Pijls, B.B. De, and K. Peels Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses N Engl J Med 334 1996 1703 1708
16. A. Berger, K.J. Botman, and P.A. MacCarthy Long-term clinical outcome after fractional flow reserve-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel disease J Am Coll Cardiol 46 2005 438 442
17. N.H. Pijls, S.P. van, and G. Manoharan Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study J Am Coll Cardiol 49 2007 2105 2111
18. J.M. Potvin, J. Rodes-Cabau, and O.F. Bertrand Usefulness of fractional flow reserve measurements to defer revascularization in patients with stable or unstable angina pectoris, non-ST-elevation and ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction, or atypical chest pain Am J Cardiol 98 2006 289 297
19. C. Briguori, A. Anzuini, and F. Airoldi Intravascular ultrasound criteria for the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary artery stenoses and comparison with fractional flow reserve Am J Cardiol 87 2001 136 141
20. V. Jasti, E. Ivan, V. Yalamanchili, N. Wongpraparut, and M.A. Leesar Correlations between fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound in patients with an ambiguous left main coronary artery stenosis Circulation 110 2004 2831 2836 (Pubitemid 39473605)
21. A. Takagi, Y. Tsurumi, Y. Ishii, K. Suzuki, M. Kawana, and H. Kasanuki Clinical potential of intravascular ultrasound for physiological assessment of coronary stenosis: relationship between quantitative ultrasound tomography and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve Circulation 100 1999 250 255
22. J. Tobis, B. Azarbal, and L. Slavin Assessment of intermediate severity coronary lesions in the catheterization laboratory J Am Coll Cardiol 49 2007 839 848
23. H. Kelbaek, L. Thuesen, and S. Helqvist Drug-eluting versus bare metal stents in patients with st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: eight-month follow-up in the Drug Elution and Distal Protection in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DEDICATION) trial Circulation 118 2008 1155 1162
24. G.J. Bech, B.B. De, and N.H. Pijls Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial Circulation 103 2001 2928 2934
25. J.J. Fischer, H. Samady, and J.A. McPherson Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severity Am J Cardiol 90 2002 210 215
26. R.A. Goldstein, R.L. Kirkeeide, and L.L. Demer Relation between geometric dimensions of coronary artery stenoses and myocardial perfusion reserve in man J Clin Invest 79 1987 1473 1478
27. J.S. Wijpkema, J. Dorgelo, and T.P. Willems Discordance between anatomical and functional coronary stenosis severity Neth Heart J 15 2007 5 11
28. W.B. Meijboom, C.A. Van Mieghem, and P.N. van Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina J Am Coll Cardiol 52 2008 636 643
29. D. Brosh, S.T. Higano, R.J. Lennon, D.R. Holmes Jr., and A. Lerman Effect of lesion length on fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions Am Heart J 150 2005 338 343
30. P.A. Tonino, B.B. De, and N.H. Pijls Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 2009 213 224
31. R.L. Kirkeeide, K.L. Gould, and L. Parsel Assessment of coronary stenoses by myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilation. VII. Validation of coronary flow reserve as a single integrated functional measure of stenosis severity reflecting all its geometric dimensions J Am Coll Cardiol 7 1986 103 113
32. R.C. Cury, M. Ferencik, and S. Achenbach Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions Eur J Radiol 57 2006 345 350
33. J.D. Dodd, J. Rieber, and E. Pomerantsev Quantification of nonculprit coronary lesions: comparison of cardiac 64-MDCT and invasive coronary angiography AJR Am J Roentgenol 191 2008 432 438
34. P.A. Sirnes, Y. Myreng, P. Molstad, and S. Golf Reproducibility of quantitative coronary analysis, assessment of variability due to frame selection, different observers, and different cinefilmless laboratories Int J Card Imaging 12 1996 197 203
35. S. Achenbach, D. Ropers, and U. Hoffmann Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 43 2004 842 847
36. U. Hoffmann, F. Moselewski, and K. Nieman Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2006 1655 1662
37. Huang WC, Wu MT, Chiou KR, et al. Assessing culprit lesions and active complex lesions in patients with early acute myocardial infarction by multidetector computed tomography. Circ J 2008 Nov;72(11):1806-13. Electronic publication ahead of print 2008 Sep 24.
38. A.J. Coats Ethical authorship and publishing Int J Cardiol 131 2009 149 150