Long-term hemodynamic performance of bileaflet prostheses versus tilting-disc prostheses in the aortic position

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 166, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 681-687

  Jeong, Dong Seop ^a   Park, Pyo Won ^a   Sung, Kiick ^a   Park, Seung Woo ^b   Lee, Sang Chol ^b   Kim, Wook Sung ^a   Lee, Young Tak ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Samsung Medical Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; Hemodynamics; Prosthetic heart valve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; AORTIC VALVE PANNUS FORMATION; ARTICLE; ATS MEDICAL OPENPIVOT BILEAFLET PROSTHESIS; BLEEDING; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; BRAIN INFARCTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GENDER; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS INDEX; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDTRONIC HALL TILTING DISC VALVE PROSTHESIS; MITRAL VALVE REPLACEMENT; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PNEUMONIA; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; PROSTHETIC VALVE ENDOCARDITIS; REOPERATION; SEPTIC SHOCK; SUDDEN DEATH; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURVIVAL; SURVIVAL RATE; THROMBOEMBOLISM; TRANSAORTIC MEAN PRESSURE GRADIENT; TRICUSPID VALVE REGURGITATION; VALVULAR HEART DISEASE; AORTA VALVE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; TRENDS;

ADULT; AGED; AORTIC VALVE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84893446887     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: 18741754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.11.105     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Hall KV, Kaster RL, Woien A. An improved pivotal disc-type prosthetic heart valve. J Oslo City Hosp 1979; 29: 3-21.
2. Butchart EG, Griffiths BE, Breckenridge IM. Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of the Medtronic-Hall valve: experience with 370 implanted valves. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1983; 31(Spec 2): 81-4.
3. Tayama E, Feng Z, Oda T, et al. ATS prosthetic valve motion: an in vitro analysis. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 408-14.
4. Sung K, Park PW, Park KH, Jun TG, Lee YT, Yang JH. Comparison of transprosthetic mean pressure gradients between Medtronic Hall and ATS valves in the aortic position. Int J Cardiol 2005; 99: 29-35.
5. Akins CW, Miller DC, Turina MI, et al. Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions. Ann Thorac Surg 2008; 85: 1490-5.
6. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18: 1440-63.
7. Devereux RD, Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation 1977; 55: 613-8.
8. Kleine P, Hasenkam MJ, Nygaard H, Perthel M, Wesemeyer D, Laas J. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. J Heart Valve Dis 2000; 9: 308-11discussion 311-2
9. Vitale N, De Feo M, De Siena P, et al. Tilting-disc versus bileaflet mechanical prostheses in the aortic position: a multicenter evaluation. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13(Suppl. 1):S27-34.
10. Cho YH, Jeong DS, Park PW, et al. Serial changes of hemodynamic performance with Medtronic Hall valve in aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 2011; 91: 424-31.
11. Wang G, Sun Z, Xia J, et al. Predictors of secondary tricuspid regurgitation after left-sided valve replacement. Surg Today 2008; 38: 778-83.
12. Matsuyama K, Matsumoto M, Sugita T, Nishizawa J, Tokuda Y, Matsuo T. Predictors of residual tricuspid regurgitation after mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 1826-8.
13. Villemot JP, Lekehal M, Maureira P, et al. Nine-year routine clinical experience of aortic valve replacement with ATS mechanical valves. J Heart Valve Dis 2008; 17: 648-56.
14. Svennevig JL, Abdelnoor M, Nitter-Hauge S. Twenty-five-year experience with the Medtronic-Hall valve prosthesis in the aortic position: a follow-up cohort study of 816 consecutive patients. Circulation 2007; 116: 1795-800.
15. Emery RW, Krogh CC, Jones DJ, Nicoloff DM, Blake DP, Arom KV. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 2004; 13: 231-8.
16. Butchart EG, Li HH, Payne N, Buchan K, Grunkemeier GL. Twenty years' experience with the Medtronic Hall valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 121: 1090-100.
17. Sezai A, Hata M, Niino T, et al. Fifteen years of experience with ATS mechanical heart valve prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 1494-500.
18. Sakamoto Y, Hashimoto K, Okuyama H, Ishii S, Shingo T, Kagawa H. Prevalence of pannus formation after aortic valve replacement: clinical aspects and surgical treatment. J Artif Organs 2006; 9: 199-202.
19. Mullenix PS, Parsa CJ, Mackensen GB, Jollis JG, Harrison JK, Hughes GC. Pannus-related prosthetic valve dysfunction and life-threatening aortic regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis 2008; 17: 666-9.
20. Rizzoli G, Guglielmi C, Toscano G, et al. Reoperations for acute prosthetic thrombosis and pannus: an assessment of rates, relationship and risk. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999; 16: 74-80.
21. Horiguchi M, Seko T, Yazu T, Takeuchi M, Ichikawa T. Medtronic Hall valve malfunction due to pannus formation in the aortic position with peculiar movement of the leaflet: a case report. J Heart Valve Dis 2008; 17: 583-5.