Comparison of transprosthetic mean pressure gradients between Medtronic Hall and ATS valves in the aortic position

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 99, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 29-35

  Sung, Kiick ^a   Park, Pyo Won ^a   Park, Kay Hyun ^a   Jun, Tae Gook ^a   Lee, Young Tak ^a   Yang, Ji Hyuk ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aortic valve replacement; ATS valve; Medtronic Hall valve; Transprosthetic pressure gradient

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 13844317359     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.10.066     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Rao V., Christakis G.T., Weisel R.D., Buth K.J., Ikonomidis J.S., Shirai T., et al. Changing pattern of valve surgery. Circulation. 94(Suppl. II):1996;II-113-II-120
2. Yoganathan A.P., Chaux A., Gray R.J., et al. Bileaflet tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 3:1984;313-320
3. Rahimtoola S.H. Valve prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update. J. Heart Valve Dis. 7:1998;207-210
4. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36:2000;1131-1141
5. Dumesnil J.G., Honos G.N., Lemieux M., Beauchemin J. Validation and application of indexed aortic prosthetic valve areas calculated by Doppler echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 16:1990;637-643
6. Sim E.K.W., Orszulak T.A., Schaff H.V., Shub C. Influence of prosthesis size on change in left ventricular mass following aortic valve replacement. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 8:1994;293-297
7. Gonzalez-Juanatey J.R., Garcia-Acuna J.M., Fernandez M.V., et al. Influence of the size of aortic valve prostheses on hemodynamics and change in left ventricular mass: implications for the surgical management of aortic stenosis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 112:1996;273-280
8. Kratz J.M., Sade R.M., Crawford F.A. Jr., Crumbley A.J. III, Stroud M.R. The risk of small St. Jude aortic valve prosthesis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 57:1994;1114-1118
9. Morris J.J., Schaff H.V., Mullany C.J., et al. Determinants of survival and recovery of left ventricular function after aortic valve replacement. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 56:1993;22-30
10. Arom K.V., Nicoloff D.M., Kersten T.E., Northrup W.F. III, Lindsay W.G., Emery R.W. Ten years' experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 47:1989;831-837
11. Rao V., Jamieson W.R.E., Ivanov J., Amstrong S., David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 102(Suppl. III):2000;III-5-III-9
12. Adams D.H., Chen R.H., Kadner A., Aranki S.F., Allred E.N., Cohn L.H. Impact of small prosthetic valve size on operative mortality in elderly patients after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: dose gender matter? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 118:1999;815-822
13. Manougian S., Seybold-Epting W. Patch enlargement of the aortic valve ring by extending the aortic incision into the anterior mitral leaflet. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 78:1979;402-412
14. Konno S., Imai Y., Lida Y., Nakajima M., Tatsuno K. A new method for prosthetic valve replacement in congenital aortic stenosis associated with hypoplasia of the aortic valve ring. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 70:1975;909-917
15. Rastan H., Koncz J. Aortoventriculoplasty: a new technique for treatment of left ventricular outflow obstruction. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 71:1976;920-927
16. Sommers K.E., David T.E. Aortic valve replacement with patch enlargement of the aortic annulus. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 63:1997;1608-1612
17. David T.E., Bos J., Rakowski H. Aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV bioprosthesis. J. Heart Valve Dis. 1:1992;244-248
18. Dorty J.R., Salazar J.D., Liddicoat J.R., Flores J.H., Doty D.B. Aortic valve replacement with cryopreserved aortic allograft: ten-year experience. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 115:1998;371-379
19. Joyce F., Tingleff J., Pettersson G. A systematic technical approach to the Ross operation. J. Heart Valve Dis. 5:1996;391-401
20. Devereux R.D., Reichek N. Echocardiographic determination of left ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method. Circulation. 55:1977;613-618
21. Marcus R.H., Heinrich R.S., Bednarz J., et al. Assessment of small-diameter aortic mechanical prostheses: physiological relevance of the Doppler gradient, utility of flow augmentation, and limitations of orifice area estimation. Circulation. 98:1998;866-872
22. Kleine P., Hasenkam M.J., Nygaard H., Perthel M., Wesemeyer D., Laas J. Tilting disc versus bileaflet aortic valve substitutes: intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamic performance in humans. J. Heart Valve Dis. 9:2000;308-312
23. Aris A., Ramirez I., Camara M.L., Carreras F., Borras X., Pons-Llado G. The 20 mm Medtronic Hall prosthesis in the small aortic root. J. Heart Valve Dis. 5:1996;459-462
24. Brazao A.J., Prieto D., de Oliveira J.F., Eugenio L., Antunes M.J. Aortic valve replacement with small-sized disc prostheses (Medtronic Hall). J. Heart Valve Dis. 8:1999;680-686
25. Butchart E.G., Li H., Payne N., Buchan K., Grunkemeier G.L. Twenty year's experience with the Medtronic Hall valve. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 121:2001;1090-1100
26. Autschbach R., Walther T., Falk V., et al. Prospectively randomized comparison of different mechanical aortic valves. Circulation. 102(Suppl. III):2000;III-1-III-4
27. Vandervoort P.M., Greenberg N.L., Powell K.A., Cosgrove D.M., Thomas J.D. Pressure recovery in bileaflet heart valve prostheses. Circulation. 92:1995;3464-3472
28. Baumgartner H., Khan S., DeRobertis M., Czer L., Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro: a manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation. 82:1990;1467-1475
29. Becassis P., Hayot M., Frapier J., et al. Postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement by small-size prosthesis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 36:2000;871-877
30. Park S.H., Shub C., Nobrega T.P., Bailey K.R., Seward J.B. Two-dimensional echocardiographic calculation of left ventricular mass as recommended by the American society of echocardiography: correlation with autopsy and m-mode echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 9:1996;119-128
31. Knez I., Rienmuller R., Maier R., Rehak P., et al. Left ventricular architecture after valve replacement due to cirtical stenosis: an approach to dis-/qualify the myth of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 19:2001;797-805
32. Medalion B., Blackstone E.H., Lytle B.W., White J., Arnold J.H., Cosgrove D.M. Aortic valve replacement: is valve size important? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 119:2000;963-974
33. Hayashi J., Nakazawa S., Okazaki H., et al. Long term clinical results with 19 mm or 21 mm standard aortic St. Jude medical prosthesis. J. Heart Valve Dis. 3:1994;537-542