Elevated cytokine expression of different PEEK wear particles compared to UHMWPE in vivo

Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 141-149

  Lorber, V ^a   Paulus, A C ^a   Buschmann, A ^a   Schmitt, B ^a   Grupp, T M ^a,b   Jansson, V ^a   Utzschneider, Sandra ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b B Braun Melsungen AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICULAR CARTILAGES; BEARING MATERIALS; BONE MARROW; CYTOKINE EXPRESSION; INITIAL HYPOTHESIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PROINFLAMMATORY; WEAR PARTICLES;

ARTHROPLASTY; BIOACTIVITY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BONE; CARTILAGE; ETHERS; JOINTS (ANATOMY); KETONES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; ORTHOPEDICS;

SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS);

BIOMATERIAL; CYTOKINE; INTERLEUKIN 1BETA; INTERLEUKIN 6; POLYETHERETHERKETONE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR ALPHA; ULTRA HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY; BONE MARROW; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; IN VIVO STUDY; KNEE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SYNOVIUM;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE MARROW; CARBON; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; CYTOKINES; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; INTERLEUKIN-1BETA; INTERLEUKIN-6; KETONES; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MATERIALS TESTING; MICE; MICE, INBRED BALB C; MODELS, ANIMAL; PARTICLE SIZE; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYETHYLENES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SYNOVIAL MEMBRANE; TUMOR NECROSIS FACTOR-ALPHA;

EID: 84893428282     PISSN: 09574530     EISSN: 15734838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10856-013-5037-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Horwitz MD, Awan S, Chatoo MB, Stott DJ, Powles DP. An 8- to 10-year review of the Rotaglide total knee replacement. Int Orthop. 2009;33(1):111-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0492-9.
2. Purdue PE, Koulouvaris P, Potter HG, Nestor BJ, Sculco TP. The cellular and molecular biology of periprosthetic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;454:251-61. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238813.95035.1b.
3. Holt G, Murnaghan C, Reilly J, Meek RM. The biology of aseptic osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;460:240-52. doi: 10.1097/BLO. 0b013e31804b4147.
4. Chiu R, Ma T, Smith RL, Goodman SB. Ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene wear debris inhibits osteoprogenitor proliferation and differentiation in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89(1):242-7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32001.
5. Wright TM. Polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: what is the future? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;440:141-8.
6. Oral E, Wannomae KK, Rowell SL, Muratoglu OK. Diffusion of vitamin E in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Biomaterials. 2007;28(35):5225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.08.025.
7. Scholes SC, Unsworth A. Wear studies on the likely performance of CFR-PEEK/CoCrMo for use as artificial joint bearing materials. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2009;20(1):163-70. doi: 10.1007/s10856-008-3558-3.
8. Latif AM, Mehats A, Elcocks M, Rushton N, Field RE, Jones E. Pre-clinical studies to validate the MITCH PCR Cup: a flexible and anatomically shaped acetabular component with novel bearing characteristics. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2008;19(4):1729-36. doi: 10.1007/s10856-007-3256-6.
9. Ponnappan RK, Serhan H, Zarda B, Patel R, Albert T, Vaccaro AR. Biomechanical evaluation and comparison of polyetheretherketone rod system to traditional titanium rod fixation. Spine J. 2009;9(3):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.002.
10. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS. Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials. 2006;27(3):324-34. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.011.
11. Utzschneider S, Becker F, Grupp TM, Sievers B, Paulus A, Gottschalk O, et al. Inflammatory response against different carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK wear particles compared with UHMWPE in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(11):4296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.002.
12. Grupp TM, Utzschneider S, Schroder C, Schwiesau J, Fritz B, Maas A, et al. Biotribology of alternative bearing materials for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(9):3601-10. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04. 003.
13. 14243 ISOI. Implants for surgery - wear of total knee-joint-prostheses - part 1: loading and displacement parameters for wear-testing machines with load control and corresponding environmental conditions for tests. Geneva: International Standard Organization. 2002.
14. Catelas I, Huk OL, Petit A, Zukor DJ, Marchand R, Yahia L. Flow cytometric analysis of macrophage response to ceramic and polyethylene particles: effects of size, concentration, and composition. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;41(4):600-7.
15. Matthews JB, Besong AA, Green TR, Stone MH, Wroblewski BM, Fisher J, et al. Evaluation of the response of primary human peripheral blood mononuclear phagocytes to challenge with in vitro generated clinically relevant UHMWPE particles of known size and dose. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52(2):296-307.
16. Vermes C, Chandrasekaran R, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO, Roebuck KA, Glant TT. The effects of particulate wear debris, cytokines, and growth factors on the functions of MG-63 osteoblasts. J Bone and Joint Surg Am. 2001;83A(2):201-11.
17. Yao J, Cs-Szabo G, Jacobs JJ, Kuettner KE, Glant TT. Suppression of osteoblast function by titanium particles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(1):107-12.
18. 10993-5 ISOI. Biological evaluation of mediacal devices - part 5: tests for in vitro cytotoxity. Geneva: International Standard Organization. 1999.
19. Green TR, Fisher J, Matthews JB, Stone MH, Ingham E. Effect of size and dose on bone resorption activity of macrophages by in vitro clinically relevant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene particles. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;53(5):490-7.
20. al-Saffar N, Revell PA. Pathology of the bone-implant interfaces. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 1999;9(4):319-47.
21. Bauer TW. Particles and periimplant bone resorption. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:138-43.
22. Zysk SP, Gebhard H, Plitz W, Buchhorn GH, Sprecher CM, Jansson V, et al. Influence of orthopedic particulate biomaterials on inflammation and synovial microcirculation in the murine knee joint. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2004;71(1):108-15. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30075.
23. Zysk SP, Gebhard HH, Kalteis T, Schmitt-Sody M, Jansson V, Messmer K, et al. Particles of all sizes provoke inflammatory responses in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;433:258-64.
24. Illgen RL 2nd, Bauer LM, Hotujec BT, Kolpin SE, Bakhtiar A, Forsythe TM. Highly crosslinked vs conventional polyethylene particles: relative in vivo inflammatory response. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24(1):117-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.01.134.
25. Ma T, Huang Z, Ren PG, McCally R, Lindsey D, Smith RL, et al. An in vivo murine model of continuous intramedullary infusion of polyethylene particles. Biomaterials. 2008;29(27):3738-42. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.031.
26. Ren WP, Markel DC, Zhang R, Peng X, Wu B, Monica H, et al. Association between UHMWPE particle-induced inflammatory osteoclastogenesis and expression of RANKL, VEGF, and Flt-1 in vivo. Biomaterials. 2006;27(30):5161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.04.004.
27. Wooley PH, Morren R, Andary J, Sud S, Yang SY, Mayton L, et al. Inflammatory responses to orthopaedic biomaterials in the murine air pouch. Biomaterials. 2002;23(2):517-26.
28. Bi Y, Collier TO, Goldberg VM, Anderson JM, Greenfield EM. Adherent endotoxin mediates biological responses of titanium particles without stimulating their phagocytosis. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(4):696-703. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00176-0.
29. Cho DR, Shanbhag AS, Hong CY, Baran GR, Goldring SR. The role of adsorbed endotoxin in particle-induced stimulation of cytokine release. J Orthop Res. 2002;20(4):704-13. doi: 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00179-6.
30. Howling GI, Sakoda H, Antonarulrajah A, Marrs H, Stewart TD, Appleyard S, et al. Biological response to wear debris generated in carbon based composites as potential bearing surfaces for artificial hip joints. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2003;67(2):758-64. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.10068.
31. Morrison C, Macnair R, MacDonald C, Wykman A, Goldie I, Grant MH. In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. Biomaterials. 1995;16(13):987-92.
32. Rivard CH, Rhalmi S, Coillard C. In vivo biocompatibility testing of peek polymer for a spinal implant system: a study in rabbits. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;62(4):488-98. doi: 10.1002/jbm.10159.
33. Jockisch KA, Brown SA, Bauer TW, Merritt K. Biological response to chopped-carbon-fiber-reinforced peek. J Biomed Mater Res. 1992;26(2):133-46. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820260202.
34. Chang CH, Fang HW, Ho YC, Huang HT. Chondrocyte acting as phagocyte to internalize polyethylene wear particles and leads to the elevations of osteoarthritis associated NO and PGE2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;369(3):884-8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.02.123.
35. Schmalzried TP, Campbell P, Schmitt AK, Brown IC, Amstutz HC. Shapes and dimensional characteristics of polyethylene wear particles generated in vivo by total knee replacements compared to total hip replacements. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997;38(3):203-10.
36. Libouban H, Massin P, Gaudin C, Mercier P, Basle MF, Chappard D. Migration of wear debris of polyethylene depends on bone microarchitecture. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2009;90(2):730-7. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.31341.
37. Massin P, Chappard D, Flautre B, Hardouin P. Migration of polyethylene particles around nonloosened cemented femoral components from a total hip arthroplasty-an autopsy study. J Biomed Mater Res B. 2004;69(2):205-15. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.30001.