Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey

Nurse Education Today

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 361-367

  Nagata, Satoko ^a   Gregg, Misuzu F ^b   Miki, Yuko ^c   Arimoto, Azusa ^a   Murashima, Sachiyo ^a   Kim, Mi Ja ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b KOBE CITY COLLEGE OF NURSING   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative research; Doctoral nursing education; Evaluation; Japan

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD;

ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FACULTY, NURSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRES; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 84859633225     PISSN: 02606917     EISSN: 15322793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Adams K.A. What colleges and universities want in new faculty, Association of American Colleges and Universities Retrieved April 15, 2011 from. http://www.aacu.org/pff/pdfs/PFF_Adams.PDF.
2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing Faculty shortages in baccalaureate and graduate nursing programs: scope of the problem and strategies for expanding the supply Retrieved April 15, 2011 from. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/pdf/05FacShortage.pdf.
3. Anderson C.A. Current strengths and limitations of doctoral education in nursing: are we prepared for the future?. Journal of Professional Nursing 2000, 16(4):191-200.
4. Berk R.A. Using the 360 degrees multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism. Medical Teacher 2009, 31(12):1073-1080.
5. Bollen K.A. Multiple indicators: internal consistency of no necessary relationship?. Quality and Quantity 1984, 18:377-385.
6. Centeral Council for Education Toward the construction of a bachelor course education Retrieved April 15, 2011 from. http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/1217067.htm.
7. Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: a comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management 2006, 17(4):263-282.
8. Dolmans D.H.J.M., Wolfhagen H.A.P., Scherpbier A.J.J.A. From quality assurance to total quality management: how can quality assurance result in continuous improvement in health professions education?. Education for Health 2003, 16(2):210-217.
9. Heine S.J., Lehman D.R., Markus H.R., Kitamura S. Is there a universal need for positive self-regard?. Psychological Review 1999, 106(4):766-794.
10. Higher Education Bureau, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Quality assurance framework of higher education in Japan Retrieved April 15, 2011 from. http://www.mext.go.jp/english/koutou/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2009/10/09/1284979_1.pdf.
11. Hinshaw A. A continuing challenge: the shortage of educationally prepared nursing faculty. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing 2001, 6(1). Retrieved April 15, 2011 from www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume62001/No1Jan01/ShortageofEducationalFaculty.aspx.
12. International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing, Directory of International Doctoral Programs. 2007. Retrieved April 15, 2011 from http://www.umich.edu/~inden/programs.
13. Jahangiri L., Mucciolo T.W., Choi M.J., Spielman A.I. Assessment of teaching effectiveness in US dental schools and the value of triangulation. Journal of Dental Education 2008, 72(6):707-718.
14. Japanese Association of Nursing Programs in University Reports on the Development of the Evaluation System of Nursing Science: Toward an Accreditation for Higher Education in Nursing 2009, (in Japanese).
15. Japan Nursing Association Statistical Data on Nursing Service in Japan 2009 2010, 195-197. Japan Nursing Association, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
16. Japan Nursing Association Statistical Data on Nursing Service in Japan 2004 2005, 193-194. Tokyo, Japan Nursing Association, (in Japanese).
17. Ketefian S., Davidson P., Daly J., Chang E., Srisuphan W. Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing of Health Science 2005, 7:150-156.
18. Kim M.J., McKenna H.P., Ketefian S. Global quality criteria, standards, and indicators for doctoral programs in nursing; literature review and guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2006, 43(4):477-489.
19. Kim M.J., Lee H., Kim H.K., Ahn Y.H., Kim E., Yun S.N., Lee K.J. Quality of faculty, students, curriculum and resources for nursing doctoral education in Korea: a focus group study. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2010, 47:295-306.
20. Kjellgren K.I., Welin C., Danielson E. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs - a review and a strategy for follow up. Nurse Education Today 2005, 25(4):316-325.
21. Kogan J.R., Shea J.A. Course evaluation in medical education. Teaching and Teacher Education 2007, 23(3):251-264.
22. Lee N. Making research supervision work for you. Nurse Researcher 2010, 17(2):44-51.
23. MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff P.M., Jarvis C.B. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. Journal of Applied Psychology 2005, 90(4):710-730.
24. McKenna H. Doctoral education: some treasonable thoughts. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2005, 42:245-246.
25. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Personnel engaged in R & D. White Paper on Science and Technology 2007 2007, 130. Retrieved April 15, 2011 from http://www.mext.go.jp/english/news/2008/03/08021921/002/002.pdf.
26. Mizikaci F. A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education 2006, 14(1):37-53.
27. National Institution for Academic Degrees and University Evaluation Standards for evaluation and accreditation of universities 2009-2010 Retrieved April 15, 2011 from. http://www.niad.ac.jp/english/pdf/standards2009_niad-ue_e.pdf.
28. Nursing in the World Editorial Committee and the International Nursing Foundation of Japan Nursing in the World 2008, 35-172. The International Nursing Foundation of Japan, Tokyo.
29. Petter S., Straub D.W., Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 2007, 31(4):623-656.
30. Rossiter J.R. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2002, 19(4):305-335.
31. Turale S., Ito M., Nakao F. Issues and challenges in nursing and nursing education in Japan. Nurses Education in Practice 2008, 8:1-4.
32. Wulff D.H., Nerad M. Using an alignment model as a framework in the assessment of doctoral programs. The Assessment of Doctoral Education: Emerging Criteria and New Models for Improving Outcomes 2006, 83-108. Stylus, VA. P.L. Maki, N.A. Borkowski (Eds.).
33. Yoon S.J.L., Wolfe S., Yucha C.B., Tsai P. Research support by doctoral-granting colleges/schools of nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing 2002, 18(1):16-21.