Accessibility evaluation of classroom captions

ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Kushalnagar, Raja S ^a   Lasecki, Walter S ^b   Bigham, Jeffrey P ^c  

^a ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b University of Rochester   (United States)

^c Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Crowdsourcing; Deaf; Hard of hearing; Real time captioning

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY EVALUATION; AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION; CLASSROOM LECTURE; CROWDSOURCING; DEAF; HARD OF HEARINGS; HUMAN-POWERED; REAL-TIME CAPTIONING;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

AUDITION;

EID: 84893353120     PISSN: 19367228     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/2543578     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Ahmed Sabbir Arif andWolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2009. Analysis of text entry performance metrics. In Proceedings of the IEEE Toronto International Conference Science and Technology for Humanity (TIC-STH). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 100-105. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TIC-STH.2009.5444533.
2. Susan Aud, William Hussar, Grace Kena, Kevin Bianco, Lauren Frohlich, Jana Kemp, and Kim Tahan.2011. The condition of education 2011. NCES 2011-033.
3. Keith Bain, Sara H. Basson, and Mike Wald. 2002. Speech recognition in university classrooms. In Proceedings of the 5th International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (Assets'02). ACM Press, New York, 192. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/638249.638284.
4. Michael S. Bernstein, Joel R. Brandt, Robert C. Miller, and David R. Karger. 2011.Crowds in two seconds: Enabling realtime crowd-powered interfaces. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'11). ACM, New York. To appear. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 1866029.1866080.
5. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Chandrika Jayant, Hanjie Ji, Greg Little, Andrew Miller, Robert C. Miller, Robin Miller, Aubrey Tatarowicz, Brandyn White, Samual White, and Tom Yeh. 2010. VizWiz: Nearly real-time answers to visual questions. In Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'10). ACM, New York, 333-342. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 1866029.1866080.
6. J. Boyd and E. A. Vader. 1972. Captioned television for the deaf. Am. Ann. Deaf 117, 1, 34-37.
7. Xiaodong Cui, Liang Gu, Bing Xiang,Wei Zhang, and Yuqing Gao. 2008. Developing high performance asr in the IBM multilingual speech-to-speech translation system. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP'08). IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA, 5121-5124. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2008.4518811.
8. Greg Downey. 2006. Constructing "computer-compatible" stenographers: The transition to real-time transcription in courtroom reporting. Technol. and Culture 47, 1, 1-26. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/tech.2006.0068.
9. L. B. Elliot, M. S. Stinson, B. G. McKee, V. S. Everhart, and P. J. Francis. 2001. College students' perceptions of the C-print speech-to-text transcription system. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Edu. 6, 4, 285-98. DOI:http://dx.doi. org/10.1093/deafed/6.4.285.
10. M. Bryce Fifield. 2001. Realtime remote online captioning: An effective accommodation for rural schools and colleges. In Instructional Technology And Education of the Deaf Symposium. NTID, Rochester, NY, 1-9.
11. Jan Hasbrouck and Gerald A. Tindal. 2006. Oral reading fluency norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. Reading Teacher 59, 7, 636-644. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.7.3.
12. Carl Jensema. 1996. Closed-captioned television presentation speed and vocabulary. Am. Ann. Deaf 141, 4, 284-292.
13. Carl Jensema. 1998. Viewer reaction to different television captioning speeds. Am. Ann. Deaf 143, 4, 318-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 9842059.
14. Carl J. Jensema, Ramalinga S. Danturthi, and Robert Burch. 2000. Time spent viewing captions on television programs. Am. Ann. Deaf 145, 5, 464-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11191825.
15. Amy B. Jordan, Anne Albright, Amy Branner, and John Sullivan. 2003. The state of closed captioning services in the United States. Tech. rep., National Captioning Institute Foundation, Washington, DC., 47pp.
16. Richard Kheir and Thomas Way. 2007. Inclusion of deaf students in computer science classes using realtime speech transcription. In Proceedings of the 12th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE'07). ACM, New York, 261-265. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1145/1268784.1268860.
17. Dennis H. Klatt. 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. J. Acoustical Soc. Am. 59, 5, 1208. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.380986.
18. Raja S. Kushalnagar, Walter S. Lasecki, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2012. A readability evaluation of real-time crowd captions in the classroom. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS'12). ACM, New York, 71-78. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/ 2384916.2384930.
19. Raja S. Kushalnagar, Walter S. Lasecki, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Captions versus transcripts for online video content. In Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disclipinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A). ACM, New York, 41-45.
20. Harry G. Lang. 2002. Higher education for deaf students: Research priorities in the new millennium. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Edu. 7, 4, 267-280. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/7.4.267.
21. Walter S. Lasecki and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2012. Online quality control for real-time crowd captioning. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS'12). ACM, New York, 143-150. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384942.
22. Walter S. Lasecki, Kyle I. Murray, Samuel White, Robert C. Miller, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2011. Realtime crowd control of existing interfaces. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'11). ACM, New York. To appear.
23. Walter S. Lasecki, Christopher D. Miller, Adam Sadilek, Andrew Abumoussa, Donato Borrello, Raja S. Kushalnagar, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2012. Real-time captioning by groups of non-experts. In Proceedings of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'12). ACM Press, New York, 23-34. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2380116.2380122.
24. Walter S. Lasecki, Christopher D. Miller, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Warping Time for More Effective Real-Time Crowdsourcing. In Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13). ACM Press, New York, 2033-2036.
25. Daniel G. Lee, Deborah I. Fels, and John Patrick Udo. 2007. Emotive captioning. Comput. Entertain. 5, 2, 11. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1279540. 1279551.
26. Marc Marschark, Patricia Sapere, Carol Convertino, and Jeff Pelz. 2008. Learning via direct and mediated instruction by deaf students. J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Edu. 13, 4, 546-561. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn014.
27. Richard E. Mayer, Julie Heiser, and Steve Lonn. 2001. Cognitive constraints on multimedia learning: When presenting more material results in less understanding. J. Edu. Psychol. 93, 1, 187-198. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10. 1037/0022-0663.93.1.187.
28. Matthew J. Murphy, Christopher D. Miller, Walter S. Lasecki, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Adaptive time windows for real-time crowd captioning. In Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA'13). ACM, New York, 13-18.
29. Yingxin Pan, Danning Jiang, Lin Yao, Michael Picheny, and Yong Qin. 2010. Effects of automated transcription quality on non-native speakers' comprehension in real-time computer-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'10). ACM, New York, 1725-1731. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1753326. 1753584.
30. Ross Stuckless. 1999. Recognition means more than just getting the words right: Beyond accuracy to readability. Speech Technol. 1, 30-35.
31. Frank Thorn and Sondra Thorn. 1996. Television captions for hearing-impaired people: A study of key factors that affect reading performance. Hum. Factors 38, 3, 452-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8865768.