Post-processing scheme for modelling the lithospheric magnetic field

Solid Earth

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 105-118

  Lesur, V ^a   Rother, M ^a   Vervelidou, F ^b   Hamoudi, M ^c   Thebault E ^b  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

^b INSTITUT DE PHYSIQUE DU GLOBE DE PARIS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY HOUARI BOUMEDIENE   (Algeria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LITHOSPHERIC MAGNETIC FIELD; LITHOSPHERIC MODELS; NON-LINEAR INVERSE PROBLEM; POST-PROCESSING SCHEME; POST-PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; POTENTIAL FIELD DATUM; SATELLITE MAGNETIC DATA; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

ERRORS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION;

SATELLITES;

ERROR ANALYSIS; INVERSE PROBLEM; LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MODELING; SATELLITE DATA;

EID: 84893340666     PISSN: 18699510     EISSN: 18699529     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/se-4-105-2013     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hamoudi, M., Quesnel, Y., Dyment, J., and Lesur, V.: Aeromagnetic and Marine Measurements, in: Geomagnetic Observations and Models, edited by: Mandea, M. and Korte, M., IAGA book series, 5, 57-105, Springer, doi:10.1007/978-90- 481-9858-0, 2010.
2. Holme, R.: Modelling of attitude error in vector magnetic data: application to ∅rsted data, Earth Planet. Space, 52, 1187-1197, 2000. (Pubitemid 40836627)
3. Holme, R. and Bloxham, J.: The treatment of attitude errors in satellite geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. In., 98, 221-233, 1996.
4. Hulot, G., Olsen, N., and Sabaka, T. J.: The present field, Treatise in Geophysics, Geomagnetism, Elsevier Ltd., Amsterdam, 2007.
5. Kahaner, D., Moler, C., and Nash, S.: Numerical Methods and Software, Prentice-Hall, ISBN 978-0-13-627258-8, 1989.
6. Kusche, J.: Approximate decorrelation and non-isotropic smoothing of time-variable GRACE-type gravity field models, J. Geodesy, 81, 733-749, doi:10.1007/s00190-007-0143-3, 2007. (Pubitemid 350048175)
7. Langel, R. A., Estes, R. H., and Sabaka, T. J.: Uncertainty estimates in geomagnetic field modelling, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12281-12299, 1989.
8. Lesur, V., Wardinski, I., Rother, M., and Mandea, M.: GRIMM-The GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model based on vector satellite and observatory data, Geophys. J. Int., 173, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03724.x, 2008.
9. Lesur, V., Wardinski, I., Hamoudi, M., and Rother, M.: The second generation of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic field Model: GRIMM-2, Earth Planet. Space, 62, 765-773, doi:10.5047/eps.2010.07.007, 2010.
10. Lesur, V., Wardinski, I., Hamoudi, M., Rother, M., and Kunagu, P.: Third version of the GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model: GRIMM-3, in: IUGG2011, MR207, Melbourne, Australia, 2011.
11. Lowes, F. J. and Olsen, N.: A more realistic estimate of the variances and systematic errors in spherical harmonic geomagnetic field models, Geophys. J. Int., 157, 1027-1044, 2004. (Pubitemid 38933450)
12. Maus, S., Yin, F., L̈uhr, H., Manoj, C., Rother, M., Rauberg, J., Michaelis, I., Stolle, C., and M̈uller, R. D.: Resolution of direction of oceanic magnetic lineations by the sixth-generation lithospheric magnetic field model from CHAMP satellite magnetic measurements, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 9, 949, doi:10.1029/2008GC001, 2008.
13. Olsen, N., Glassmeier, K.-H., and Jia, X.: Separation of the Magnetic Field into External and Internal Parts., Space Science Reviews, 152, 135-157, doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9563-0, 2010a.
14. Olsen, N., L̈uhr, H., T. Sabaka, T., Michaelis, I., Rauberg, J., and Tøffner-Clausen, L.: CHAOS-4-A high-resolution geomagnetic field model derived from low-altitude CHAMP data, in: AGU Fall Meeting, Poster GP21A-0992, San Francisco, 2010b.
15. Piessens, R., Doncker-Kapenga, E., Ü berhuber, C., and Kahaner, D.: Quadpack, A Subroutine Package for Automatic Integration, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, 1, Spinger-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-540-12553-2, 1983.
16. Reigber, C. L̈uhr, H., Schwintzer, P., and Wickert, J., eds.: Earth Observation with CHAMP Results from three years in orbit, Springer-Verlag 2005.
17. Rygaard-Hjalsted, C., Constable, C. G., and Parker, R. L.: The influence of correlated crustal signals in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 717-726, 1997.
18. Th́ebault, E., Purucker, M., Whaler, K., Langlais, B., and Sabaka, T.: The Magnetic field of the Earth's lithosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 155, 95-127, doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9667-6, 2010.
19. Th́ebault, E., Vervelidou, F., Lesur, V., and Hamoudi, M.: The shortcomings of along-track satellite analysis in planetary magnetism, Geophys. J. Int., doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05281.x, 2012.