GRIMM: The GFZ Reference Internal Magnetic Model based on vector satellite and observatory data

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 173, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 382-394

  Lesur, Vincent ^a   Wardinski, Ingo ^a   Rother, Martin ^a   Mandea, Mioara ^a  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Satellite magnetics

Indexed keywords

IONOSPHERE; LITHOSPHERE; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETIC METHOD; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; SATELLITE DATA; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

EID: 42349087616     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: 1365246X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2008.03724.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Backus, G., 1970. Non-uniqueness of the external geomagnetic field determined by surface intensity measurements, J. geophys. Res., 75, 6339-6341.
2. Chambodut, A., Panet, I., Mandea, M., Diament, M., Holschneider, M. & Jamet, O., 2005. Wavelet frames: An alternative to spherical harmonic representation of potential fields, Geophys. J. Int., 163, 875-899.
3. Farquharson, C. & Oldenburgh, D., 1998. Non-linear inversion using general measures of data misfit and model structure, Geophys. J. Int., 134, 213-227.
4. Holme, R. & Olsen, N., 2006. Core surface flow modelling from high-resolution secular variation, Geophys. J. Int., 166(2), 518-528.
5. Hulot, G. & Le Mouël, J., 1994. A statistical approach to the Earth's main magnetic field, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 82, 167-183.
6. Le Mouël, J., Mayaud, P. & Shebalin, P., 2003. Magnetic activity inside the auroral zones and field-aligned currents, C.R. Geosci., 335, 935-941.
7. Lesur, V., 2006. Introducing localized constraints in global geomagnetic field modelling, Earth Planets Space, 58, 477-483.
8. Lesur, V., Macmillan, S. & Thomson, A., 2005. The BGS magnetic field candidate models for the 10th generation IGRF, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1157-1163.
9. Lowes, F., 1975. Vector errors in spherical harmonic analysis of scalar data, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 42, 637-651.
10. Mandea, M. & Olsen, N., 2006. A new approach to directly determine the secular variation from magnetic satellite observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33(L15306).
11. Maus, S., Rother, M., Stolle, C., Mai, W., Choi, S., Lühr, H., Cooke, D. & Roth, C., 2006. Third generation of the Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth (POMME), Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 7.
12. Olsen, N. & Mandea, M., 2007a. Investigation of a secular variation impulse using satellite data: The 2003 geomagnetic jerk, EPSL, 255, 94-105.
13. Olsen, N. & Mandea, M., 2007b. Rapid changing flows in the Earth's core, Nature Geoscience, submitted.
14. Olsen, N., Lühr, H., Sabaka, T., Mandea, M., Rother, M., Tøffner-Clausen, L. & Choi, S., 2006. Chaos-a model of the Earth's magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C magnetic satellite data, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 67-75.
15. Parkinson, W., 1983. Introduction to Geomagnetism, Scottish Academic Press Ltd. Edinburgh, UK.
16. Thomson, A. & Lesur, V., 2007. An improved geomagnetic data selection algorithm for global geomagnetic field modelling, Geophys. J. Int., 169, 951-963.
17. Voorhies, C., 2004. Narrow-scale flow and a weak field by the top of the Earth's core: Evidence from Ørtsed, Magsat, and secular variation, J. geophys. Res., 109, B03106.
18. Winch, D., 1968. Analysis of the geomagnetic field by means of cartesian components, Phys. Earth planet Inter., 1, 347-360.