Modelling of attitude error in vector magnetic data: Application to ørsted data

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 52, Issue 12, 2000, Pages 1187-1197

  Holme, R ^a  

^a GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; SECULAR VARIATION;

EID: 0001265132     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03352351     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cain, J. C., Z. Wang, C. Kluth, and D. R. Schmitz, Derivation of a geomagnetic model to n = 63, Geophys. J., 97, 431-441, 1989.
2. Dunlop, M. W., M. K. Dougherty, S. Kellock, and D. J. Southwood, Operation of the dual magnetometer on Cassini: science performance, Planet. Space Sci., 47, 1389-1405, 1999.
3. Gubbins, D. and J. Bloxham, Geomagnetic field analysis - III. Magnetic fields on the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 80, 695-713, 1985.
4. Holme, R. and J. Bloxham, Alleviation of the Backus effect in geomagnetic field modelling, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 1641-1644, 1995.
5. Holme, R. and J. Bloxham, The treatment of attitude errors in satellite geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 98, 221-233, 1996.
6. Holme, R. and A. Jackson, The cause and treatment of anisotropic errors in near-Earth geomagnetic data, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 103, 375-388, 1997.
7. Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, The near-Earth magnetic field at 1980 determined from Magsat data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2495-2509, 1985.
8. Langel, R. A., G. Ousley, J. Berbert, J. Murphy, and M. Settle, The Magsat mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 243-245, 1982.
9. Langel, R. A., T. J. Sabaka, R. T. Baldwin, and J. A. Conrad, The near-Earth magnetic field from magnetospheric and quiet-day ionospheric sources and how it is modeled, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 98, 235-267, 1996.
10. Lowes, F. J., Mean-square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector fields, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 2179, 1966.
11. Lowes, F. J., Vector errors in spherical harmonic analysis of scalar data, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 42, 637-651, 1975.
12. Lowes, F. J. and J. E. Martin, Optimum use of satellite intensity and vector data in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 48, 183-192, 1987.
13. Macmillan, S. and J. M. Quinn, The 2000 revision of the joint UK/US geomagnetic field models and an IGRF 2000 candidate model, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue, 1149-1162, 2000.
14. Olsen, N., T. J. Sabaka, and L. Tøffner-Clausen, Determination of the IGRF 2000 model, Earth Planets Space, 52, this issue, 1175-1182, 2000.
15. Rygaard-Hjalsted, C., C. G. Constable, and R. L. Parker, The influence of correlated crustal signals in modelling the main geomagnetic field, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 717-726, 1997.
16. Shure, L., R. L. Parker, and G. E. Backus, Harmonic splines for geomagnetic modelling, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 28, 215-229, 1982.
17. Stem, D. P. and J. H. Bredekamp, Error enhancement in geomagnetic models derived from scalar data, J. Geophys. Res., 80, 1776-1782, 1975.
18. Whaler, K. A. and D. Gubbins, Spherical harmonic analysis of the geomagnetic field: an example of a linear inverse problem, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc., 65, 645-693, 1981.