Selecting features for domain-independent named entity recognition

11th Conference on Natural Language Processing, KONVENS 2012: Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing - Proceedings of the Conference on Natural Language Processing 2012

Volumn 5, Issue , 2012, Pages 248-253

  Tkachenko, Maksim ^a   Simanovsky, Andrey ^b  

^a ST PETERSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^b HEWLETT PACKARD LABORATORIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AND FILTERS; BETTER PERFORMANCE; CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD; DOMAIN ADAPTATION; INFORMATION GAIN; NAMED ENTITY RECOGNITION;

BENCHMARKING;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84893329831     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Rie Kubota Ando and Tong Zhang. 2005. A highperformance semi-supervised learning method for text chunking. In Kevin Knight, Hwee Tou Ng, and Kemal Oflazer, editors, ACL. The Association for Computer Linguistics.
2. Shai Ben-david, John Blitzer, Koby Crammer, and Presented Marina Sokolova. 2007. Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. In In NIPS. MIT Press.
3. Peter F. Brown, Vincent J. Della Pietra, Peter V. Desouza, Jennifer C. Lai, and Robert L. Mercer. 1992. Class-Based n-gram Models of Natural Language. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):467-479.
4. Alexander Clark. 2003. Combining distributional and morphological information for part of speech induction. In Proceedings of the tenth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, EACL '03, pages 59-66, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Hal Daume III. 2007. Frustratingly easy domain adaptation. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics, pages 256-263, Prague, Czech Republic, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Richard Evans. 2003. A framework for named entity recognition in the open domain. In In Proceedings of the Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP), pages 137-144.
7. Ralph Grishman and Beth Sundheim. 1996. Message understanding conference-6: a brief history. In Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 1, COLING '96, pages 466-471, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
8. Eduard H. Hovy, Mitchell P. Marcus, Martha Palmer, Lance A. Ramshaw, and Ralph M. Weischedel. 2006. Ontonotes: The 90 In Robert C. Moore, Jeff A. Bilmes, Jennifer Chu-Carroll, and Mark Sanderson, editors, HLT-NAACL. The Association for Computational Linguistics.
9. Jing Jiang and Chengxiang Zhai. 2006. Exploiting domain structure for named entity recognition. In In Human Language Technology Conference, pages 74-81.
10. Jing Jiang and ChengXiang Zhai. 2007. A twostage approach to domain adaptation for statistical classifiers. In CIKM '07: Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, pages 401-410, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
11. Jing Jiang. 2008. A Literature Survey on Domain Adaptation of Statistical Classifiers, March.
12. Roman Klinger and Christoph M. Friedrich. 2009. Feature subset selection in conditional random fields for named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the International Conference RANLP-2009, pages 185-191, Borovets, Bulgaria, September. Association for Computational Linguistics.
13. Vijay Krishnan and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. An effective two-stage model for exploiting nonlocal dependencies in named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pages 1121-1128, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. Dekang Lin, Kenneth Church, Heng Ji, Satoshi Sekine, David Yarowsky, Shane Bergsma, Kailash Patil, Emily Pitler, Rachel Lathbury, Vikram Rao, Kapil Dalwani, and Sushant Narsale. 2010. New Tools for Web-Scale N-grams.
15. Andrew McCallum and Wei Li. 2003. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003 - Volume 4, CONLL '03, pages 188-191, Strouds-burg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Pablo N. Mendes, Max Jakob, Andrés García-Silva, and Christian Bizer. 2011. Dbpedia spotlight: Shedding light on the web of documents. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-Semantics).
17. David Nadeau and Satoshi Sekine. 2007. A survey of named entity recognition and classification. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 30(1):3-26, January.
18. L. Ratinov and D. Roth. 2009. Design challenges and misconceptions in named entity recognition. In CoNLL, 6.
19. Sandeepkumar Satpal and Sunita Sarawagi. 2007. Domain adaptation of conditional probability models via feature subsetting. In Joost N. Kok, Jacek Koronacki, Ramon López de Mäntaras, Stan Matwin, Dunja Mladenic, and Andrzej Skowron, editors, PKDD, Volume 4702 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 224-235. Springer.
20. Erik F. Tjong Kim Sang and Fien De Meulder. 2003. Introduction to the conll-2003 shared task: language-independent named entity recognition. In Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003, pages 142-147, Morristown, NJ, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. Maksim Tkatchenko, Alexander Ulanov, and Andrey Simanovsky. 2011. Classifying wikipedia entities into fine-grained classes. In ICDE Workshops, pages 212-217.
22. Alexander Yeh 2000. More accurate tests for the statistical significance of result differences.