Combining distributional and morphological information for part of speech induction

10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 59-66

  Clark, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

CLUSTERINGS; DISTRIBUTIONAL INFORMATION; MORPHOLOGICAL INFORMATION; PART-OF-SPEECH INDUCTIONS; PERFORMANCE; UNSUPERVISED ALGORITHMS;

CLUSTERING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 85094918571     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. E. Atwell, G. Demetriou, J. Hughes, A. Schiffrin, C. Souter, and S. Wilcock. 2000. A comparative evaluation of modern English corpus grammatical annotation schemes. ICAME Journal, 24:7-23.
2. Peter F. Brown, Vincent J. Della Pietra, Peter V. de Souza, Jenifer C. Lai, and Robert Mercer. 1992. Class-based n-gram models of natural language. Computational Linguistics, 18:467-479.
3. Alexander Clark. 2000. Inducing syntactic categories by context distribution clustering. In Proc. of CoNLL-2000 and LLL-2000, pages 91-94, Lisbon, Portugal.
4. Alexander Clark. 2001. Partially supervised learning of morphology with stochastic transducers. In Proc. of Natural Language Processing Pacific Rim Symposium, NLPRS 2001, pages 341-348, Tokyo, Japan, November.
5. Toma'Z Erjavec and Nancy Ide. 1998. The MULTEXT-East corpus. In First International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC'98, pages 971-974, Granada. ELRA.
6. S. Finch and N. Chater. 1992a. Bootstrapping syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 820-825.
7. S. Finch and N. Chater. 1992b. Bootstrapping syntactic categories using statistical methods. In W. Daelemans and D. Powers, editors, Background and Experiments in Machine Learning of Natural Language, pages 229-235. Tilburg University: Institute for Language Technology and Al.
8. Shai Fine, Yoram Singer, and Naftali Tishby. 1998. The hierarchical Hidden Markov Model: Analysis and applications. Machine Learning, 32:41.
9. M. Jardino and G. Adda. 1994. Automatic determination of a stochastic bi-gram class language model. In R. C. Carrasco and J. Oncina, editors, Grammatical Inference and Applications: ICGI-94, pages 57-65. Springer-Verlag.
10. Sydney M. Lamb. 1961. On the mechanisation of syntactic analysis. In 1961 Conference on Machine Translation of Languages and Applied Language Analysis, volume 2, pages 674-685. HMSO, London.
11. Sven Martin, Jörg Liermann, and Hermann Ney. 1998. Algorithms for bigram and trigram word clustering. Speech Communication, 24:19-37.
12. Andrei Mikheev. 1997. Automatic rule induction for unknown word-guessing. Computational Linguistics, 23(3):405-423, September.
13. J. Murakami, H. Yamatomo, and S. Sagayama. 1993. The possibility for acquisition of statistical network grammar using ergodic HMM. In Proceedings of Eurospeech 93, pages 1327-1330.
14. Hermann Ney, Ute Essen, and Reinhard Kneser. 1994. On structuring probabilistic dependencies in stochastic language modelling. Computer Speech and Language, 8:1-38.
15. Martin Redington, Nick Chater, and Steven Finch. 1998. Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science, 22(4):425-469.
16. Ronald Rosenfeld. 2000. Two decades of statistical language modeling: Where do we go from here? Proceedings of the IEEE, 88(8).
17. Hinrich Schütze. 1997. Ambiguity Resolution in Language Learning. CSLI Publications.
18. K. Weber, S. Bengio, and H. Bourlard. 2001. Speech recognition using advanced hmm2 features. IDIAP-RR 24, IDIAP, Martigny, Switzerland. Published: ASRU 2001, Madonna di Campiglio, Italy, December 2001.