Does Casual Sex Harm College Students’ Well-Being? A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role of Motivation

Archives of Sexual Behavior

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 945-959

  Vrangalova, Zhana ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Autonomous motivation; Casual sex; Hooking up; Psychological well being; Self determination theory

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSCIENCE; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALITY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; STUDENT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONSCIENCE; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MOTIVATION; PEER GROUP; PERSONALITY; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL PARTNERS; STUDENTS; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84893196902     PISSN: 00040002     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10508-013-0255-1     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Allison, R., & Risman, B. J. (2013). A double standard for “hooking up”: How far have we come toward gender equality? Social Science Research,42, 1191–1206. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.04.006.
2. Apostolopoulos, Y., Sönmez, S., & Yu, C. H. (2002). HIV-risk behaviours of American spring break vacationers: A case of situational disinhibition? International Journal of STD and AIDS,13, 733–743. doi:10.1258/095646202320753673.
3. Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review,77, 435–462. doi:10.1177/0003122412445802.
4. Bailey, J. M., Kirk, K. M., Zhu, G., Dunne, M. P., & Martin, N. G. (2000). Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78, 537–545. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.3.537.
5. Bancroft, J., Janssen, E., Carnes, L., Goodrich, D., & Strong, D. (2004). Sexual activity and risk taking in young heterosexual men: The relevance of sexual arousability, mood and sensation seeking. Journal of Sex Research,41, 181–192. doi:10.1080/00224490409552226.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
7. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin,117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
8. Baumeister, R. F., & Twenge, J. M. (2002). Cultural suppression of female sexuality. Review of General Psychology,6, 166–203. doi:10.1037//1089-2680.6.2.166.
9. Bersamin, M. M., Zamboanga, B. L., Schwartz, S. J., Donnellan, M. B., Hudson, M., Weisskirch, R. S., … Caraway, S. J. (2013). Risky business: Is there an association between casual sex and mental health among emerging adults? Journal of Sex Research. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.772088.
10. Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: New York University Press.
11. Brunell, A. B., & Webster, G. D. (2013). Self-determination and sexual experience in dating relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. doi:10.1177/0146167213485442.
12. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review,100, 204–232. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.100.2.204.
13. Campbell, A. (2008). The morning after and the night before. Human Nature,19, 157–173. doi:10.1007/s12110-008-9036-2.
14. Coleman, P. K., Rue, V. M., Spence, M., & Coyle, C. T. (2008). Abortion and the sexual lives of men and women: Is casual sexual behavior more appealing and more common after abortion? International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology,8, 77–91.
15. Cook, C., Heath, F., & Thompson, R. L. (2002). A meta-analysis of response rates in Web- or Internet-based surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement,60, 821–836. doi:10.1177/00131640021970934.
16. Cooper, M. L. (2002). Alcohol use and risky sexual behavior among college students and youth: Evaluating the evidence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol (Suppl. 14), 101–117.
17. Cooper, M. L., Shapiro, C. M., & Powers, A. M. (1998). Motivations for sex and risky sexual behavior among adolescents and young adults: A functional perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,75, 1528–1558. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.6.1528.
18. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: Happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,38, 668–678. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.4.668.
19. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research,40, 13–26. doi:10.1080/00224490309552163.
20. de Graaf, H., & Sandfort, T. G. M. (2004). Gender differences in affective responses to sexual rejection. Archives of Sexual Behavior,33, 395–403. doi:10.1023/B:ASEB.0000028892.63150.be.
21. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The General Causality Orientations Scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality,19, 109–134. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6.
22. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry,11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.
23. Derogatis, L. R. (1993). BSI: Administration, scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
24. Donelan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment,18, 192–203. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.2.192.
25. Eisenberg, M. E., Ackard, D. M., Resnick, M. D., & Neumark-Sztainer, D. (2009). Casual sex and psychological health among young adults: Is having ‘friends with benefits’ emotionally damaging? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health,41, 231–237. doi:10.1363/4123109.
26. Emmons, R. A. (1991). Personal strivings, daily life events, and psychological and physical well-being. Journal of Personality,59, 453–472. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00256.x.
27. Eshbaugh, E. M., & Gute, G. (2008). Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology,148, 77–89. doi:10.3200/SOCP.148.1.77-90.
28. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010a). Predictors and consequences of sexual “hookups” among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 1105–1119. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9448-4.
29. Fielder, R. L., & Carey, M. P. (2010b). Prevalence and characteristics of sexual hookups among first-semester female college students. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy,36, 346–359. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2010.488118.
30. Fielder, R. L., Carey, K. B., & Carey, M. P. (2013). Are hookups replacing romantic relationships? A longitudinal study of first-year female college students. Journal of Adolescent Health. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.001.
31. Fiesta Frog. (2013). Top party schools and universities 2012–2013 school year. Retrieved from http://www.fiestafrog.com/blog/top-party-schools-universities-2012-party-schools-nightlife/.
32. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior,26, 331–362. doi:10.1002/job.322.
33. Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences,23, 573–644. doi:10.1017/S0140525X0000337X.
34. Garcia, J. R., & Reiber, C. (2008). Hook-up behavior: A biopsychosocial perspective. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology,2, 192–208.
35. Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology,16, 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911.
36. Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Associations between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships,11, 249–265. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2004.00081.x.
37. Gilmartin, S. K. (2006). Changes in college women’s attitudes toward sexual intimacy. Journal of Research on Adolescence,16, 429–454. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2006.00501.x.
38. Glenn, N., & Marquardt, E. (2001). Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women on dating and mating today. Research report of the Institute for American Values. Retrieved April 15, 2007 from http://www.americanvalues.org/Hooking_Up.pdf.
39. Greiling, H., & Buss, D. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: The hidden dimension of extra-pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences,28, 929–963. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8.
40. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., & Harper, M. S. (2006). No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research,43, 255–267. doi:10.1080/00224490609552324.
41. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health,3, 103–111.
42. Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology,49, 233–240. doi:10.1037/a0012758.
43. Gute, G., & Eshbaugh, E. M. (2008). Personality as a predictor of hooking up among college students. Journal of Community Health Nursing,25, 26–43. doi:10.1080/07370010701836385.
44. Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). The affective shift hypothesis: The functions of emotional changes following sexual intercourse. Personal Relationships,8, 357–369. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00045.x.
45. Hill, C. A., & Preston, L. K. (1996). Individual differences in the experience of sexual motivation: Theory and measurement of dispositional sexual motives. Journal of Sex Research,33, 27–45. doi:10.1080/00224499609551812.
46. Holman, A., & Sillars, A. (2012). Talk about “hooking up”: The influence of college student social networks on non-relationship sex. Health Communication, 27, 205–216. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.575540.
47. Jenkins, S. S. (2004). Gender and self-determination in sexual motivation. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 64(12-B), 6330.
48. Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2011). Positioning the booty-call relationship on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research,46, 460–470. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.497984.
49. Kenney, S. R., Thadani, V., Ghaidarov, T., & LaBrie, J. W. (2013). First-year college women’s motivations for hooking up: A mixed methods examination of normative peer perceptions and personal hookup participation. International Journal of Sexual Health. doi:10.1080/19317611.2013.786010.
50. Kraaykamp, G. (2002). Trends and countertrends in sexual permissiveness: Three decades of attitude change in the Netherlands 1965–1995. Journal of Marriage and the Family,64, 225–239. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00225.x.
51. Kreager, D. A., & Staff, J. (2009). The sexual double standard and adolescent peer acceptance. Social Psychology Quarterly,72, 143–164. doi:10.1177/019027250907200205.
52. La Guardia, J. G., & Patrick, H. (2008). Self-determination theory as a fundamental theory of close relationships. Canadian Psychology,49, 201–209. doi:10.1037/a0012760.
53. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research,40, 129–133. doi:10.1080/00224490309552174.
54. Levin, R. J. (2007). Sexual activity, health and well-being: The beneficial roles of coitus and masturbation. Sexual and Relationship Therapy,22, 135–148. doi:10.1080/14681990601149197.
55. Lewis, M. A., Granato, H., Blayney, J. A., Lostutter, T. W., & Kilmer, J. R. (2012). Predictors of hooking up sexual behavior and emotional reactions among U.S. college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior,41, 1219–1229. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9817-2.
56. Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2006). Hooking up: The relationship contexts of ‘non-relationship’ sex. Journal of Adolescent Research,21, 459–483. doi:10.1177/0743558406291692.
57. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A., & Giordano, P. C. (2005). Adolescents’ involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research,34, 384–407. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.03.001.
58. Marks, M. J. (2008). Evaluations of sexually active men and women under divided attention: A social cognitive approach to the sexual double standard. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,30, 84–91. doi:10.1080/01973530701866664.
59. Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2005). The sexual double standard: Fact or fiction? Sex Roles,52, 175–186. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-1293-5.
60. Marks, M. J., & Fraley, R. C. (2006). Confirmation bias and the sexual double standard. Sex Roles,54, 19–26. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-8866-9.
61. McIlhaney, J. S., & Bush, F. M. (2008). Hooked: New science on how casual sex is affecting our children. Chicago, IL: Northfield Publishing.
62. Meier, A. M. (2007). Adolescent first sex and subsequent mental health. American Journal of Sociology,112, 1811–1847. doi:10.1086/512708.
63. Mendle, J., Ferrero, J., Moore, S. R., & Harden, K. P. (2013). Depression and adolescent sexual activity in romantic and nonromantic relational contexts: A genetically-informative sibling comparison. Journal of Abnormal Psychology,122, 51–63. doi:10.1037/a0029816.
64. Meston, C. M., & Buss, M. P. (2007). Why humans have sex? Archives of Sexual Behavior,36, 477–507. doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2.
65. Monahan, K. C., & Lee, J. M. (2008). Adolescent sexual activity: Links between relational context and depressive symptoms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,37, 917–927. doi:10.1007/s10964-007-9256-5.
66. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,114, 29–51. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.29.
67. Olmstead, S. B., Pasley, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Hooking up and penetrative hookups: Correlates that differentiate college men. Archives of Sexual Behavior,42, 573–583. doi:10.1007/s10508-012-9907-9.
68. Owen, J., & Fincham, F. D. (2011). Young adults’ emotional reactions after hooking up encounters. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 321–330. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9652-x.
69. Owen, J., Fincham, F. D., & Moore, J. (2011). Short-term prospective study of hooking up among college students. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 331–341. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9697-x.
70. Owen, J., Quirk, K., & Fincham, F. D. (2013). Toward a more complete understanding of reactions to hooking up among college women. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. doi:10.1080/0092623X.2012.751074.
71. Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (2010). “Hooking up” among college students: Demographic and psychosocial correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior,39, 653–663. doi:10.1007/s10508-008-9414-1.
72. Paul, E. L. (2006). Beer goggles, catching feelings, and the walk of shame: The myths and realities of the hookup experience. In D. C. Kirkpatrick, S. Duck, & M. K. Foley (Eds.), Relating difficulty: The process of constructing and managing difficult relationships (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
73. Paul, E. L., & Hayes, K. A. (2002). The casualties of ‘casual’ sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students’ hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,19, 639–661. doi:10.1177/0265407502195006.
74. Paul, E. L., McManus, B., & Hayes, A. (2000). “Hookups”: Characteristics and correlates of college students’ spontaneous and anonymous sexual experience. Journal of Sex Research,37, 76–88. doi:10.1080/00224490009552023.
75. Paul, E. L., Wenzel, A., & Harvey, J. (2009). Hookups: A facilitator or a barrier to relationship initiation and intimacy development? In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship initiation (pp. 375–390). New York: Psychology Press.
76. Petersen, J. L., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). A meta-analytic review of research on gender differences in sexuality, 1993–2007. Psychological Bulletin,136, 21–38. doi:10.1037/a0017504.
77. Peterson, Z. D., & Muehlenhard, C. L. (2007). What is sex and why does it matter? A motivational approach to exploring individuals; definitions of sex. Journal of Sex Research,44, 256–268. doi:10.1080/00224490701443932.
78. Randolph, K. K. (2013). The list is out: Top 10 party schools of 2013. Retrieved from http://college.monster.com/news/articles/2174-the-list-is-out-top-10-party-schools-of-2013?page=10.
79. Regan, P. C., & Dreyer, C. S. (1999). Lust? Love? Status? Young adults’ motives for engaging in casual sex. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality,11, 1–24. doi:10.1300/J056v11n01_01.
80. Reiber, C., & Garcia, J. R. (2010). Hooking up: Gender differences, evolution, and pluralistic ignorance. Evolutionary Psychology,8, 390–404.
81. Romero-Daza, N., & Freidus, A. (2008). Female tourists, casual sex, and HIV risk in Costa Rica. Qualitative Sociology,31, 169–187. doi:10.1007/s11133-008-9096-y.
82. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
83. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57, 749–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749.
84. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to psychotherapy: The motivational basis for effective change. Canadian Psychology,49, 186–193. doi:10.1037/a0012753.
85. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., Grolnick, W. S., & LaGuardia, J. G. (2006). The significance of autonomy and autonomy support in psychological development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Vol. 1: Theory and methods (2nd ed., pp. 795–849). New York: Wiley
86. Sakaguchi, K., Sakai, Y., Ueda, K., & Hasegawa, T. (2007). Robust association between sociosexuality and self-monitoring in heterosexual and non-heterosexual Japanese. Personality and Individual Differences,43, 815–825. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.006.
87. Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Is short-term mating the maladaptive result of insecure attachment? A test of competing evolutionary perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,31, 747–768. doi:10.1177/0146167204271843.
88. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., & Buss, D. M. (2001a). Are men really more ‘oriented’ toward short-term mating than women? Psychology, Evolution and Gender,3, 211–239. doi:10.1080/14616660110119331.
89. Schmitt, D. P., Shackelford, T. K., Duntley, J., Tooke, W., & Buss, D. M. (2001b). The desire for sexual variety as a key to understanding basic human mating strategies. Personal Relationships,8, 425–455. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00049.x.
90. Shulman, S., Walsh, S. D., Weisman, O., & Schelyer, M. (2009). Romantic contexts, sexual behavior, and depressive symptoms among adolescent males and females. Sex Roles,61, 850–863. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9691-8.
91. Stepp, L. S. (2007). Unhooked: How young women pursue sex, delay love, and lose at both. New York: Riverhead Books.
92. Teixeira, P. J., Carraҫa, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,9, 78–108. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
93. Thornton, A., & Young-DeMarco, L. (2001). Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: The 1960s through the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family,63, 1009–1037. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.01009.x.
94. Townsend, J. M. (1995). Sex without emotional involvement: An evolutionary interpretation of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behavior,24, 173–206. doi:10.1007/BF01541580.
95. Townsend, J. M., & Wasserman, T. H. (2011). Sexual hookups among college students: Sex differences in emotional reactions. Archives of Sexual Behavior,40, 1173–1181. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9841-2.
96. Vrangalova, Z., Bukberg, R., & Gerulf, R. (2013). Birds of a feather? Not when it comes to sexual permissiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. doi:10.1177/0265407513487638.
97. Weaver, S. J., & Herold, E. S. (2000). Casual sex and women: Measurement and motivational issues. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality,12, 23–41. doi:10.1300/J056v12n03_02.
98. Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology,98, 222–244. doi:10.1037/a0016984.
99. Wentland, J. J., & Reissing, E. D. (2011). Taking casual sex not too casually: Exploring definitions of casual sexual relationships. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality,20, 75–91.
100. Whipple, B., Knowles, J., & Davis, J. (2003). The health benefits of sexual expression [White Paper]. New York: Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., and the Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality. [Updated 2007 by Gianotten, W. L., & Golub, D.]
101. Young, L., & Wang, Z. (2004). The neurobiology of human mating. Nature Neuroscience,7, 1048–1054. doi:10.1038/nn1327.
102. Yzerbyt, V. Y., Muller, D., & Judd, C. M. (2004). Adjusting researchers’ approach to adjustment: On the use of covariates when testing interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,40, 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.001.