Talk About "Hooking Up": The Influence of College Student Social Networks on Nonrelationship Sex

Health Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 205-216

  Holman, Amanda ^a   Sillars, Alan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84857078260     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2011.575540     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Aiken, L. S. and West, S. G. 1991. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions, Thousand Oaks: Sage.
2. Bianchi, S. M. and Casper, L. M. 2000. American families. Population Bulletin, 55: 220-232.
3. Bogle, K. A. 2007. The shift from dating to hooking up: What scholars have missed. Sociology Compass, 10: 775-788.
4. Bogle, K. A. 2008. Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus, New York: New York University Press.
5. Booth-Butterfield, M. and Sidelinger, R. 1998. The influence of family communication on the college-aged child: Openness, attitudes and actions about sex and alcohol. Communication Quarterly, 46: 295-308.
6. Burt, R.S. 1983. "Range". In Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction, Edited by: Burt, R. S. and Minor, M. J. 176-194. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7. Campo, S., Brossard, D., Frazer, M. S., Marchell, T., Lewis, D. and Talbot, J. 2003. Are social norms campaigns really magic bullets? Assessing the effects of students' misperceptions on drinking behavior. Health Communication, 15: 481-497.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2009). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance 2009. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. www.cdc.gov/std/stats09 (http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats09)
9. Dawson, J. F. and Richter, A. W. 2006. Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: Development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 917-926.
10. Dorsey, A. M., Scherer, C. W. and Real, K. 1999. The college tradition of "drink til you drop": The relation between students' social networks and engaging in risky behavior. Health Communication, 11: 313-334.
11. Downing-Matibag, T. M. and Geisinger, B. 2009. Hooking up and sexual risk taking among college students: A health belief model perspective. Qualitative Health Research, 19: 1196-1209.
12. Epstein, M., Calzo, J. P., Smiler, A. P. and Ward, L. M. 2009. "Anything from making out to having sex": Men's negotiations of hooking up and friends with benefits scripts. Journal of Sex Research, 46: 414-424.
13. Eshbaugh, E. M. and Gute, G. 2008. Hookups and sexual regret among college women. Journal of Social Psychology, 148: 77-89.
14. Fielder, R. L. and Carey, M. P. 2010. Predictors and consequences of sexual "hookups" among college students: A short-term prospective study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39: 1105-1119.
15. Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T. and Turner, M. G. 2000. The sexual victimization of college women, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and the Bureau of Justice Statistics.
16. Flack, W. F., Daubman, K. A., Caron, M. L., Asadorian, J. A., D'Aureli, N. R., Gigliotti, S. H. and Stine, E. R. 2007. Risk factors and consequences of unwanted sex among university students: Hooking up, alcohol, and stress response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22: 139-157.
17. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Signorielli, N. and Shanahan, J. 2002. "Growing up with television: Cultivation processes". In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, 2nd, Edited by: Bryant, J. and Zillman, D. 43-67. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Glenn, N. and Marquardt, E. 2001. Hooking up, hanging out, and hoping for Mr. Right: College women and dating and mating today, New York: Institute of American Values.
19. Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
20. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P. and Harper, M. S. 2006. No strings attached: The nature of casual sex in college students. Journal of Sex Research, 43: 255-267.
21. Guzmán, B. L., Schlehofer-Sutton, M. M., Villanueva, C. M., Dello Stritto, M. E., Casad, B. J. and Feria, A. 2003. Let's talk about sex: How comfortable discussions about sex impact teen sexual behavior. Journal of Health Communication, 8: 583-598.
22. Heaney, C. A. and Israel, B. A. 1995. "Social networks and social support". In Health behaviors and health education: Theory, research and practice, 2nd, Edited by: Glanz, K., Lewis, F. M. and Rimer, B. K. 179-205. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Heisler, J. M. 2005. Family communication about sex: Parents and college-aged offspring recall discussion topics, satisfaction, and parental involvement. Journal of Family Communication, 5: 295-312.
24. Herold, E. S., Maticka-Tyndale, E. and Mewhinney, D. 1998. Predicting intentions to engage in casual sex. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15: 502-516.
25. Hines, D., Saris, R. N. and Throckmorton-Belzer, L. 2002. Pluralistic ignorance and health risk behaviors: Do college students misperceive social approval for risky behaviors on campus and in media. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32: 2621-2640.
26. Hughes, M., Morrison, K. and Asada, K. J. K. 2005. What's love got to do with it? Exploring the impact of maintenance rules, love attitudes, and network support on friends with benefits relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 69: 49-66.
27. Knobloch, L. K. and Donovan-Kicken, E. 2006. Perceived involvement of network members in courtships: A test of the relational turbulence model. Personal Relationships, 13: 281-302.
28. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S. and Apple, K. J. 2003. Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40: 129-133.
29. Lapinski, M. K. and Rimal, R. N. 2005. An explication of social norms. Communication Theory, 15: 127-147.
30. Littleton, H., Tabernik, H., Canales, E. J. and Backstrom, T. 2009. Risky situation or harmless fun? A qualitative examination of college women's bad hook-up and rape scripts. Sex Roles, 60: 793-804.
31. Manning, W. D., Longmore, M. A. and Giordano, P. C. 2005. Adolescents' involvement in non-romantic sexual activity. Social Science Research, 34: 384-407.
32. Metts, S. and Spitzberg, B. H. 1996. "Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach". In Communication yearbook 19, Edited by: Burleson, B. R. 49-91. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Morr Serewicz, M. C. and Gale, E. 2008. First-date scripts: Gender roles, context, and relationship. Sex Roles, 58: 149-164.
34. O'Dougherty Wright, M., Norton, D. L. and Matusek, J. A. 2010. Predicting verbal coercion following sexual refusal during a hookup: Diverging gender patterns. Sex Roles, 62: 647-660.
35. Owen, J. J., Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M. and Fincham, F. D. 2010. "Hooking up" among college students: Demographic and psychological correlates. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39: 653-663.
36. Paul, E. L. and Hayes, K. A. 2002. The casualties of causal sex: A qualitative exploration of the phenomenology of college students' hookups. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19: 639-661.
37. Paul, E. L., McManus, B. and Hayes, A. 2000. Hookups: Characteristics and correlates of college students' spontaneous and anonymous sexual experiences. Journal of Sex Research, 37: 76-88.
38. Real, K. and Rimal, N. 2007. Friends talk to friends about drinking: Exploring the role of peer communication in the theory of normative social behavior. Health Communication, 22: 169-180.
39. Simon, W. and Gagnon, J. H. 1984. Sexual Scripts. Society, 22: 53-60.
40. Vander Ven, T. and Beck, J. 2010. Getting drunk and hooking up: An exploratory study of the relationship between alcohol intoxication and casual coupling in a university sample. Sociological Spectrum, 29: 626-648.