Gene expression profiling and histomorphometric analyses of the early bone healing response around nanotextured implants

Nanomedicine

Volumn 8, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1385-1395

  Wazen, Rima M ^a   Kuroda, Shingo ^a,b   Nishio, Clarice ^a   Sellin, Karine ^a   Brunski, John B ^c   Nanci, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

bone; DNA microarray; histomorphometry; nanotopography; titanium alloy

Indexed keywords

CELL PROTEIN; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; NANOMATERIAL; SULFURIC ACID; TITANIUM;

AMINO ACID METABOLISM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE IMPLANT; BONE SCREW; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; CARBON METABOLISM; CATABOLISM; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MOTILITY; CELL STRUCTURE; COENZYME; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DNA MICROARRAY; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; ENZYME METABOLISM; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FATTY ACID METABOLISM; FRACTURE HEALING; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMMUNE RESPONSE; LIPID METABOLISM; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; MUSCLE CONTRACTION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEIC ACID METABOLISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN METABOLISM; PROTEIN MODIFICATION; PROTEIN TARGETING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RAT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEROID METABOLISM; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; ANIMAL; GENETICS; HUMAN; PROSTHESES AND ORTHOSES; SURGERY; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; NANOSTRUCTURES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OSTEOGENESIS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; RATS; TIBIA; TITANIUM; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84893164244     PISSN: 17435889     EISSN: 17486963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2217/nnm.12.167     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2 review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int. J. Prosthodont. 17(5), 544-564 (2004).
2. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: A systematic review. J. Dent. Res. 85(6), 496-500(2006).
3. Brunski JB, Puleo DA, Nanci A. Biomaterials and biomechanics of oral and maxillofacial implants: Current status and future developments. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 15(1), 15-46 (2000).
4. Liu H, Webster TJ. Nanomedicine for implants: A review of studies and necessary experimental tools. Biomaterials 28(2), 354-369 (2006).
5. Variola F, Brunski JB, Orsini G, Tambasco de OP, Wazen R, Nanci A. Nanoscale surface modifications of medically relevant metals: State-of-The art and perspectives. Nanoscale 3(2), 335-353 (2011).
6. Lord MS, Modin C, Foss M, et al.: Monitoring cell adhesion on tantalum and oxidised polystyrene using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. Biomaterials 27(26), 4529-4537 (2006).
7. Raimondo T, Puckett S, Webster TJ. Greater osteoblast and endothelial cell adhesion on nanostructured polyethylene and titanium. Int. J. Nanomed. 5, 647-652 (2010).
8. Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, et al.: Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells (MG63). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 29, 389-401 (1995).
9. Curtis AS, Gadegaard N, Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Wilkinson CD, Aitchison G. Cells react to nanoscale order and symmetry in their surroundings. IEEE Trans. Nanobiosci. 3(1), 61-65 (2004).
10. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, et al.: Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 27(15), 2980-2987 (2006).
11. Pennisi CP, Dolatshahi-Pirouz A, Foss M, et al.: Nanoscale topography reduces fibroblast growth, focal adhesion size and migration-related gene expression on platinum surfaces. Coll. Surf. B. Biointerfaces 85(2), 189-197 (2011).
12. Boyan BD, Bonewald LF, Paschalis EP, et al.: Osteoblast-mediated mineral deposition in culture is dependent on surface microtopography. Calcif. Tissue Int. 71(6), 519-529 (2002).
13. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Simoes LG, et al.: Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: Effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-To-implant contact in vivo. Int. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Implants 24(2), 205-215 (2009).
14. Palmquist A, Emanuelsson L, Branemark R, Thomsen P. Biomechanical, histological and ultrastructural analyses of laser micro-And nano-structured titanium implant after 6 months in rabbit. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B. Appl. Biomater. 97(2), 289-298 (2011).
15. Campbell TM, Wong WT, Mackie EJ. Establishment of a model of cortical bone repair in mice. Calcif. Tissue Int. 73(1), 49-55 (2003).
16. Nanci A, Wuest JD, Péru L, et al.: Chemical modification of titanium surfaces for covalent attachment of biological molecules. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 40, 324-335 (1998).
17. Richert L, Vetrone F, Yi JH, et al.: Surface nanopatterning to control cell growth. Adv. Mater. 20(8), 1488-1492 (2008).
18. Variola F, Yi JH, Richert L, Wuest JD, Rosei F, Nanci A. Tailoring the surface properties of Ti6Al4V by controlled chemical oxidation. Biomaterials 29(10), 1285-1298 (2008).
19. Vetrone F, Variola F, Tambasco de OP, et al.: Nanoscale oxidative patterning of metallic surfaces to modulate cell activity and fate Nano Lett. 9(2), 659-665 (2009).
20. Yi JH, Bernard C, Variola F, et al.: Characterization of a bioactive nanotextured surface created by controlled chemical oxidation of titanium. Surf. Sci. 600(19), 4613-4621 (2006).
21. Chiesa R, Giavaresi G, Fini M, et al.: In vitro and in vivo performance of a novel surface treatment to enhance osseointegration of endosseous implants. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 103(6), 745-756 (2007).
22. Novak JP, Sladek R, Hudson TJ. Characterization of variability in large-scale gene expression data: Implications for study design. Genomics 79(1), 104-113 (2002).
23. Novak JP, Kim SY, Xu J, et al.: Generalization of DNA microarray dispersion properties: Microarray equivalent of t-distribution. Biol. Direct. 1, 27 (2006).
24. Guilbault C, Novak JP, Martin P, et al.: Distinct pattern of lung gene expression in the Cftr-KO mice developing spontaneous lung disease compared with their littermate controls. Physiol. Genomics 25(2), 179-193 (2006).
25. Baldi P, Long AD. A Bayesian framework for the analysis of microarray expression data: Regularized t-Test and statistical inferences of gene changes. Bioinformatics 17(6), 509-519 (2001).
26. Nanci A, Wazen RM, Zalzal S, et al.: A tracer study with systemically and locally administered dinitrophenylated osteopontin. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 52(12), 1591-1600 (2004).
27. Laboux O, Ste-Marie LG, Glorieux FH, Nanci A. Quantitative immunogold labeling of bone sialoprotein and osteopontin in methylmethacrylate-embedded rat bone. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 51(1), 61-67 (2003).
28. Morra M. Biochemical modification of titanium surfaces: Peptides and ECM proteins. Eur. Cell Mater. 12, 1-15 (2006).
29. Lord MS, Foss M, Besenbacher F. Influence of nanoscale surface topography on protein adsorption and cellular response. Nano Today 5(1), 66-78 (2010).
30. Donos N, Retzepi M, Wall I, Hamlet S, Ivanovski S. In vivo gene expression profile of guided bone regeneration associated with a microrough titanium surface. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 22(4), 390-398 (2011).
31. Donos N, Hamlet S, Lang NP, et al.: Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 22(4), 365-372 (2011).
32. Wise JK, Sena K, Vranizan K, et al.: Temporal gene expression profiling during rat femoral marrow ablation-induced intramembranous bone regeneration. PLoS One 5(10), e12987 (2010).
33. Mantila Roosa SM, Liu Y, Turner CH. Gene expression patterns in bone following mechanical loading. J. Bone Miner. Res. 26(1), 100-112 (2011).
34. Omar O, Lenneras M, Svensson S, et al.: Integrin and chemokine receptor gene expression in implant-Adherent cells during early osseointegration. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21(3), 969-980 (2010).
35. Omar O, Svensson S, Zoric N, et al.: In vivo gene expression in response to anodically oxidized versus machined titanium implants. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 92(4), 1552-1566 (2010).
36. Omar OM, Lenneras ME, Suska F, et al.: The correlation between gene expression of proinflammatory markers and bone formation during osseointegration with titanium implants. Biomaterials 32(2), 374-386 (2011).
37. Zhang L, Webster TJ. Poly-lactic-glycolic-Acid surface nanotopographies selectively decrease breast adenocarcinoma cell functions. Nanotechnology 23(15), 155101 (2012).
38. Zhang L, Webster TJ. Decreased lung carcinoma cell functions on select polymer nanometer surface features. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 100(1), 94-102 (2012).