A choice prediction competition for social preferences in simple extensive form games: An introduction

Games

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 257-276

  Ert, Eyal ^a   Erev, Ido ^b   Roth, Alvin E ^c,d  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b Max Wertheimer Minerva Center for Cognitive Studies   (Israel)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Altruism; Fairness; Reciprocity; Social preferences; Social welfare; Trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 84893093472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20734336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/g2030257     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andreoni, J. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J.1990, 100, 464-477.
2. Bolton, G.E. A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev.1991, 81, 1096-1136.
3. Fehr, E.; Schmidt, K.M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econ. 1999, 114, 817-868.
4. Loewenstein, G.F.; Thompson, L.; Bazerman, M.H. Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J. Person. Soc. psychol.1989, 57, 426-441.
5. Falk, A.; Fischbacher, U. A theory of reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 2006, 54, 293-315.
6. Rabin, M. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 1993, 83, 1281-1302.
7. Messick, D.M.; McClintock, C.G. Motivational bases of choice in experimental games. J. Exper. Soc. Psychol.1968, 4, 1-25.
8. Stahl, D.O.; Wilson, P.W. On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econ. Behav. 1995, 10, 218-254.
9. Güth, W.; Schmittberger, R.; Schwarze, B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 1982, 3, 367-388.
10. Forsythe, R.; Horowitz, J.L.; Savin, N.E.; Sefton, M. Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games Econ. Behav. 1994, 6, 347-369.
11. Berg, J.; Dickhaut, J.; McCabe, K. A comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidence. Games Econ. Behav. 1995, 10, 122-142.
12. Fehr, E.; Kirchler, E.; Weichbold, A.; Gächter, S. When social norms overpower competition: Gift exchange in experimental labor markets. J. Lab. Econ. 1998, 16, 324-351.
13. Bolton, G.E.; Ockenfels, A. ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 2000, 90, 166-193.
14. Charness, G.; Rabin, M. Understanding social preferences with simple tests. Quart. J. Econ. 2002, 117, 817-869.
15. Erev, I.; Ert, E.; Roth, A.E.; Haruvy, E.; Herzog, S.M.; Hau, R.; Hertwig, R.; Stewart, T.; West, R.; Lebiere, C. A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. J. Behav. Dec. Making 2010, 23, 15-47.
16. Erev, I.; Ert, E.; Roth, A.E. A choice prediction competition for market entry games: An introduction. Games 2010, 1, 117-136.
17. Fischbacher, U. Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Exp. Econ. 2007, 10, 171-178.
18. Brandts, J.; Charness, G. Hot vs. cold: Sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games. Exper. Econ. 2000, 2, 227-238.
19. Brandts, J.; Charness, G. The strategy versus direct response method: A first survey of experimental comparisons. Exp. Econ. 2011, doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9272-x.
20. Erev, I.; Roth, A.E.; Slonim, R.; Barron, G. Learning and equilibrium as useful approximations: Accuracy of prediction on randomly selected constant sum games. Econ. Theory 2007, 33, 29-51.
21. Falk, A.; Fehr, E.; Fischbacher, U. On the nature of fair behavior. Econ. Inq. 2003, 41, 20-26.
22. Güth, W.; Huck, S.; Müller, W. The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games. Games Econ. Behav. 2001, 37, 161-169.
23. De Bruyn, A.; Bolton, G.E. Estimating the influence of fairness on bargaining behavior. Manag. Sci. 2008, 54, 1774-1791.
24. Engelmann, D.; Strobel, M. Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution games. Am. Econ. Rev. 2004, 94, 857-869.