Assessing the quality of central venous catheter and peripherally inserted central catheter videos on the youtube video-sharing web site

JAVA - Journal of the Association for Vascular Access

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 177-182

  Carr, Peter J ^a   Alexandrou, Evan ^c,d,e   Jackson, Gavin M ^b   Spencer, Timothy R ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (Australia)

^b SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

^e LIVERPOOL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Centers for disease control and prevention; Central venous catheter; Clinical excellence commission; National institute clinical excellence; Peripherally inserted central catheter; Video sharing networks

Indexed keywords

2 PROPANOL; CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE;

ANTISEPSIS; ARTICLE; CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERIZATION; EYE PROTECTIVE DEVICE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; INTERNET; MASK; PERIPHERALLY INSERTED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; REAL TIME ECHOGRAPHY; SKIN DECONTAMINATION; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 84893038471     PISSN: 15528855     EISSN: 15571289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.java.2013.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. YouTube statistics. http://www.youtube.com/yt/press/ statistics.html. 2013 accessed on April 3, 2013.
2. Azer SA. Can "YouTube" help students in learning surface anatomy? Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(5):465-468.
3. Alexandrou E, Ramjan L, Murphy J, Hunt L, Betihavas V, Frost SA. Training of undergraduate clinicians in vascular access: An integrative review. J Assoc Vasc Access. 2012;17(3):146-158.
4. Topps D, Helmer J, Ellaway R. YouTube as a platform for publishing clinical skills training videos. Acad Med. 2013;88:192-197.
5. Jaffar AA. YouTube: An emerging tool in anatomy education. Anatom Sci Educ. 2012;5(3):158-164.
6. Rössler B, Lahner D, Schebesta K, Chiari A, Plochi W. Medical information on the Internet: quality assessment of lumbar puncture and neuroaxial block techniques on YouTube. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(6):655-658.
7. Pant S, Deshmukh A, Murugiah K, Kumar G, Sachdeva R, Mehta JL. Assessing the credibility of the "YouTube approach" to health information on acute myocardial infarction. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):281-285.
8. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP. YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritisea wakeup call? J Rheumatol. 2012;39(5):899-903.
9. Comfere B. Central venous catheters: considerations regarding placement and clinical use. Contemp Crit Care. 2007;5:1-10.
10. Raad I. Intravascular-catheter-related infections. Lancet. 1998;351(9106):893.
11. McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(12):1123-1133.
12. Rickard CM, Webster J, Wallis MC, et al. Routine versus clinically indicated replacement of peripheral intravenous catheters: a randomised controlled equivalence trial. Lancet. 2012;380(9847):1066-1074.
13. Ge X, Cavallazzi R, Li C, Pan SM, Wang YW, Wang FL. Central venous access sites for the prevention of venous thrombosis, stenosis and infection. Cochrane Database Sys Rev. 2012;3. CD004084.
14. Moureau N, Lamperti M, Kelly LJ, et al. Evidence-based consensus on the insertion of central venous access devices: definition of minimal requirements for training. Br J Anaesth. 2013;110(3):347-356.
15. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(26):2725-2732.
16. Burrell AR, McLaws ML, Murgo M, et al. Aseptic insertion of central venous lines to reduce bacteraemia. Med J Aust. 2011;194(11):583-587.
17. Pronovost PJ, Geoschel CA, Colantuoni E, et al. Sustaining reductions in catheter related bloodstream infections in Michigan intensive care units: observational study. BMJ. 2010;340:c309.
18. Berenholtz SM, Pronovost PJ, Lipsett PA, et al. Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(10):2014.
19. Ong A, Dysert K, Herbert C, et al. Trends in central lineassociated bloodstream infections in a trauma-surgical intensive care unit. Arch Surg. 2011;146(3):302.
20. Central Line Associated Bacteraemia in NSW Intensive Care Units (CLAB ICU) Final Report, Clinical Excellence Commission: Sydney, Australia; 2010.
21. Infection Prevention and Control of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Primary and Community Care. Sydney, Australia: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2012. NICE clinical guideline No. 139.
22. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(4 Suppl 1):S1-34.
23. Hessel EA 2nd. Con: we should not enforce the use of ultrasound as a standard of care for obtaining central venous access. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(5):725-728.
24. Augoustides JGT, Cheung AT. Pro: ultrasound should be the standard of care for central catheter insertion. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(5):720-724.
25. Ezaru CS, Mangione MP, Oravitz TM, Ibinson JW, Bjerke RJ. Eliminating arterial injury during central venous catheterization using manometry. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(1):130-134.
26. Ezaru C, Murray A, Oravitz T, Ibinson J, Mangione M. Pro and con ultrasound: are we missing the larger picture? J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(1):203.
27. Yonei A, Nonoue T, Sari A. Real-time ultrasonic guidance for percutaneous puncture of the internal jugular vein. Anesthesiology. 1986;64(6):830-831.
28. Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: a meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(12):2053-2058.
29. Guidance on the Use of Ultrasound Locating Devices for Placing Central Venous Catheters. London, England: National Institute for Clinical Excellence; 2002. Tecnology Appraisal Guidance No. 49.
30. Maecken T, Grau T. Ultrasound imaging in vascular access. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(Suppl 5):S178.
31. Maiwald M, Chan ES. The forgotten role of alcohol: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical efficacy and perceived role of chlorhexidine in skin antisepsis. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):5.
32. Peterson ED, Coombs LP, DeLong ER, Haan CK, Fergusun TB. Procedural volume as a marker of quality for CABG surgery. JAMA. 2004;291(2):195-201.
33. Gammie JS, O'Brien SM, Griffith BP, Ferguson TB, Peterson ED. Influence of hospital procedural volume on care process and mortality for patients undergoing elective surgery for mitral regurgitation. Circulation. 2007;115(7): 881-887.
34. Hannan EL, O'Donnell JF, Kilburn H Jr, Bernard HR, Yazici A. Investigation of the relationship between volume and mortality for surgical procedures performed in New York State hospitals. JAMA. 1989;262(4):503-510.
35. Jollis JG, Peterson ED, Nelson CL, et al. Relationship between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty volume and outcome in elderly patients. Circulation. 1997;95(11):2485-2491.
36. Harnage S. Seven years of zero central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(21):S6-S12.
37. GMEPdGlobal Medical Education Project. https://gmep. org/. Accessed January 11, 2013.
38. Pratt RJ, Pellowe CM, Wilson JA, et al. epic2: National evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcareassociated infections in NHS hospitals in England. J Hosp Infect. 2007;65(Suppl 1):S1-S64.
39. Inwood S. Skin antisepsis: using 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol. Br J Nurs. 2007;16(22): 1392-1394.
40. Adams D, Elliot TS. Skin antiseptics used prior to intravascular catheter insertion. Br J Nurs. 2007;16(5):278-280.
41. O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA, et al. Summary of recommendations: guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2011;52(9):e162-e193.