Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: Insights from the good radial artery size prediction (GRASP) study

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 211-216

  Kotowycz, Mark A ^a   Johnston, K Wayne ^a   Ivanov, Joan ^a   Asif, Nadia ^a   Almoghairi, Abdulrahman M ^a   Choudhury, Anirban ^a   Nagy, Christian D ^a   Sibbald, Matthew ^a   Chan, William ^a   Seidelin, Peter H ^a   Barolet, Alan W ^a   Overgaard, Christopher B ^a   Džavík, Vladimír ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ASIAN; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; BODY SURFACE; BODY WEIGHT; BRACHIAL ARTERY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENDER; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIAL ARTERY; SHOE SIZE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ULNAR ARTERY; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; VASCULAR ACCESS; WRIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 84892997943     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2013.11.021     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bertrand O.F., Rao S.V., Pancholy S., et al. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and interventions: results of the first international transradial practice survey. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 3:1022-1031.
2. Cooper C.J., El-Shiekh R.A., Cohen D.J., et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999, 138:430-436.
3. Jolly S.S., Yusuf S., Cairns J., et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011, 377:1409-1420.
4. Agostoni P., Biondi-Zoccai G.G., de Benedictis M.L., et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures; systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:349-356.
5. Jolly S.S., Amlani S., Hamon M., Yusuf S., Mehta S.R. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009, 157:132-140.
6. Louvard Y., Lefevre T., Allain A., Morice M. Coronary angiography through the radial or the femoral approach: the CARAFE study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001, 52:181-187.
7. Mann T., Cowper P.A., Peterson E.D., et al. Transradial coronary stenting: comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000, 49:150-156.
8. Kotowycz M.A., Dzavik V. Radial artery patency after transradial catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012, 5:127-133.
9. Stella P.R., Kiemeneij F., Laarman G.J., et al. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1997, 40:156-158.
10. Sanmartin M., Gomez M., Rumoroso J.R., et al. Interruption of blood flow during compression and radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007, 70:185-189.
11. Zankl A.R., Andrassy M., Volz C., et al. Radial artery thrombosis following transradial coronary angiography: incidence and rationale for treatment of symptomatic patients with low-molecular-weight heparins. Clin Res Cardiol 2010, 99:841-847.
12. Nagai S., Abe S., Sato T., et al. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83:180-186.
13. Wakeyama T., Ogawa H., Iida H., et al. Intima-media thickening of the radial artery after transradial intervention. An intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:1109-1114.
14. Yonetsu T., Kakuta T., Lee T., et al. Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomography. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:1608-1615.
15. Rhyne D., Mann T. Hand ischemia resulting from a transradial intervention: successful management with radial artery angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 76:383-386.
16. Ruzsa Z., Pinter L., Kolvenbach R. Anterograde recanalisation of the radial artery followed by transradial angioplasty. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2010, 11:266.e1-266.e4.
17. Greenwood M.J., Della-Siega A.J., Fretz E.B., et al. Vascular communications of the hand in patients being considered for transradial coronary angiography: is the Allen's test accurateα. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:2013-2017.
18. Sullivan L.M., Massaro J.M., D'Agostino R.B. Presentation of multivariate data for clinical use: the Framingham Study risk score functions. Stat Med 2004, 23:1631-1660.
19. Yoo B.S., Yoon J., Ko J.Y., et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol 2005, 101:421-427.
20. Saito S., Ikei H., Hosokawa G., Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999, 46:173-178.
21. Gwon H.C., Doh J.H., Choi J.H., et al. A 5Fr catheter approach reduces patient discomfort during transradial coronary intervention compared with a 6Fr approach: a prospective randomized study. J Interv Cardiol 2006, 19:141-147.
22. Chugh S.K., Chugh S., Chugh Y., Rao S.V. Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013, 82:64-73.
23. Dahm J.B., Vogelgesang D., Hummel A., et al. A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002, 57:172-176.
24. Pancholy S., Coppola J., Patel T., Roke-Thomas M. Prevention of radial artery occlusion-patent hemostasis evaluation trial (PROPHET study): a randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008, 72:335-340.
25. Cubero J.M., Lombardo J., Pedrosa C., et al. Radial compression guided by mean artery pressure versus standard compression with a pneumatic device (RACOMAP). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009, 73:467-472.
26. Plante S., Cantor W.J., Goldman L., et al. Comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin on radial artery occlusion after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 76:654-658.