Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI)

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 64-73

  Kumar Chugh, Sanjay ^a   Chugh, Sunita ^a   Chugh, Yashasvi ^b   Rao, Sunil V ^c  

^a ESCORTS HEART INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

^b KASTURBA MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

angioplasty; color Doppler; radial artery size; transulnar; ulnar artery size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANTECUBITAL FOSSA; ARM; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; BRACHIAL ARTERY; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PERIPHERAL BLOOD VESSEL MALFORMATION; RADIAL ARTERY; REGISTER; TREATMENT RESPONSE; ULNAR ARTERY; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; VASCULAR ACCESS;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIAL ARTERY; REGISTRIES; ULNAR ARTERY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84879388045     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.24585     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D,. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches-The ACCESS study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997; 29: 1269-1275.
2. Lotan C, Hasin Y, Mosseri M,. Transradial approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1995; 76: 164-167.
3. Mann JT, Cubeddu MG, Schneider JE,. Right radial access for PTCA: A prospective study demonstrates reduced complications and hospital charge. J Invasive Cardiol 1996; 8: 40D-44D.
4. Missault L, Eeman T,. Brachial, radial, or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: A randomized comparison. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 41: 124-130.
5. Wu CJ, Lo PH, Chang KC,. Transradial coronary angiography and angioplasty in Chinese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 40: 159-163.
6. Hildick Smith DJR, Ludman PF, Stephens NG,. Comparison of radial versus brachial approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography when the femoral approach is contraindicated. Am J Cardiol 1998;81: 770-772.
7. Nagai S, Abe S, Sato T,. Ultrasonic assessment of vascular complications in coronary angiography and angioplasty after transradial approach. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83: 180186.
8. Saito S, Miyake S, Hosokawa G,. Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 2012; 46: 37-41.
9. Caputo RP, Simons A, Giambartolomei A,. Transradial cardiac catheterization in elderly patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 51: 287-290.
10. Saito S,. Transradial approach: From the evangelist's view. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001; 53: 269-270.
11. Hamon M, Sabatier R, Zhao Q,. Mini-invasive strategy in acute coronary syndromes: Direct coronary stenting using 5 Fr guiding catheters and transradial approach. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2002; 55: 340-343.
12. Stella PR, Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ,. Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1997; 40: 156-158.
13. Jolly SS,. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography & intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and metanalysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2010; 157: 132-140.
14. Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R,. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 1057-1064.
15. Ball WT, Sharieff W, Jolly SS,. Characterization of operator learning curve for transradial coronary interventions. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 336-341.
16. Lo TS, Nolan J, Fountzopoulos E,. Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome. Heart 2009; 95: 410-415.
17. Uglietta JP, Kadir S,. Arteriographic study of variant arterial anatomy of the upper extremities. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1989; 12: 145-148.
18. Coppola J, Patel T, Kwan T,. Nitroglycerine, nitroprusside or both in preventing radial artery spasm during transradial artery catheterization. J Invasive Cardiol 2006; 18: 55-58.
19. Chugh SK, Panwar RB, Kasliwal RR,. Transradial coronary angiography: Left or right. Indian Heart J 2004; 56: 5.
20. Chugh SK,. Transradial access: Right or left? Indian Heart J 2008; 60 (Suppl A): 27-35.
21. Barbeau GR, Arsenault GF, Dugas L,. Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: Comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 489-493.
22. Gulati R, Prasad A, Rihal CS,. Sheathless transradial intervention using standard guide catheters. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010;1; 76: 911-916.
23. Brueck M, Bandorski D, Kramer W, Wieczorek M, Höltgen R, Tillmanns H,. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 1047-1054.
24. Pancholy S, Coppola J, Patel T,. PROPHET study: A randomized comparison of traditional versus patency documented hemostasis after transradial catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 72: 335-340.
25. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J,. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): A randomized, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011; 377: 1409-1420.
26. Guédès A, Dangoisse V, Gabriel L,. Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: A study of 1,826 consecutive procedures. J Invasive Cardiol 2010; 22: 391-397.