Fluid-structure interaction simulation of pulsatile ventricular assist devices

Computational Mechanics

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 971-981

  Bazilevs, Y ^a   Long, C C ^a   Marsden, A L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Blood flow; Finite elements; Fluid structure interaction; Isogeometric analysis; Pulsatile VAD; Rotation free shells

Indexed keywords

AIR; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID MECHANICS;

BLOOD FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL CHALLENGES; COMPUTATIONAL TECHNIQUE; ISOGEOMETRIC ANALYSIS; PULSATILE VAD; REALISTIC SIMULATION; ROTATION-FREE SHELLS; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 84892970840     PISSN: 01787675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-013-0858-3     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Benson DJ, Farthing MW, Kees CE (2012) Free-surface flow and fluid-object interaction modeling with emphasis on ship hydrodynamics. J Appl Mech 79:010905
2. Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y, Kees CE, Farthing MW (2011) Isogeometric analysis of free-surface flow. J Comput Phys 230:4137-4152
3. Akkerman I, Dunaway J, Kvandal J, Spinks J, Bazilevs Y (2012) Toward free-surface modeling of planing vessels: simulation of the Fridsma hull using ALE-VMS. Comput Mech 50:719-727
4. Amodeo A, Brancaccio G, Michielon G, Filippelli S, Ricci Z, Morelli S, Gagliardi MG, Iacobelli R, Pongiglione G, Di Donato RM (November 2010) Pneumatic pulsatile ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation in pediatric patients. Artif Organs 34(11):1017-1022
5. Arabia FA, Tsau PH, Smith RG, Nolan PE, Paramesh V, Bose RK, Woolley DS, Sethi GK, Rhenman BE, Copeland J (2006) Pediatric bridge to heart transplantation: application of the berlin heart, medos, and the thoratec ventricular assist devices. J Heart Lung Transplant 25(1):16-21
6. BazilevsY, Akkerman I (2010) Large eddy simulation of turbulent Taylor-Couette flow using isogeometric analysis and the residualbased variational multiscale method. J Comput Phys 229:3402-3414
7. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrel JA, Hughes TJR, Reali A, Scovazzi G (2007) Variational multiscale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197:173-201
8. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Cottrell JA, Evans JA, Hughes TJR, Lipton S, Scott MA, Sederberg TW (2010) Isogeometric analysis using T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:229-263
9. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y (2008) Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Comput Mech 43:3-37
10. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Benson D, Sankaran S, Marsden A (2009) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and application to a total cavopulmonary connection. Comput Mech 45: 77-89
11. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Benson DJ (2012) A computational procedure for prebending of wind turbine blades. Int J Numer Methods Eng 89:323-336
12. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Kiendl J, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2011) 3D simulation of wind turbine rotors at full scale. Part II: Fluid-structure interaction modeling with composite blades. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:236-253
13. Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Scott MA (2012) Isogeometric fluidstructure interaction analysis with emphasis on non-matching discretizations, and with application towind turbines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. doi:10.1016/j.cma. 2012.03.028
14. BazilevsY, Ming-Chen H,Takizawa K,TezduyarTE(2012) ALEVMS and ST-VMS methods for computer modeling of windturbine rotor aerodynamics and fluid-structure interaction. Math Models Methods Appl Sci 22(supp 02):1230002
15. Bazilevs Y, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak imposition of Dirichlet boundary conditions in fluid mechanics. Comput Fluids 36: 12-26
16. Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2007) Weak Dirichlet boundary conditions for wall-bounded turbulent flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 196:4853-4862
17. Bazilevs Y, Michler C, Calo VM, Hughes TJR (2010) Isogeometric variational multiscale modeling of wall-bounded turbulent flows with weakly enforced boundary conditions on unstretched meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:780-790
18. Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2013) Computational fluid-structure interaction: methods and applications. Wiley, Chichester
19. Benson DJ, BazilevsY, De Luycker E,Hsu M-C, ScottM,Hughes TJR, Belytschko T (2010) A generalized finite element formulation for arbitrary basis functions: from isogeometric analysis to XFEM. Int J Numer Methods Eng 83:765-785
20. Benson DJ, BazilevsY, HsuM-C,Hughes TJR (2010) Isogeometric shell analysis: the Reissner-Mindlin shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:276-289
21. Benson DJ, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Hughes TJR (2011) A large deformation, rotation-free, isogeometric shell. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:1367-1378
22. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 32:199-259
23. Cavanaugh JL, Miyamoto SD, da Cruz E, Pietra BA, Campbell DN, Mitchell MB, Peyton CE, Gruenwald J, Darst JR (2010) Predicting recovery: successful explant of a ventricular assist device in a child with dilated cardiomyopathy. J Heart Lung Transplant 29(1):105-108
24. Chung J, Hulbert GM (1993) A time integration algorithm for structural dynamics withimproved numerical dissipation: the generalized-α method. J Appl Mech 60:371-375
25. Cirak F, Ortiz M (2001) Fully C1-conforming subdivision elements for finite deformation thin shell analysis. Int J NumerMethods Eng 51:813-833
26. Cirak F, Ortiz M, Schröder P (2000) Subdivision surfaces: a new paradigm for thin shell analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 47:2039-2072
27. Cirak F, Scott MJ, Antonsson EK, Ortiz M, Schröder P (2002) Integrated modeling, finite-element analysis, and engineering design for thin-shell structures using subdivision. Computer-Aided Des 34:137-148
28. Dörfel MR, Jüttler B, Simeon B (2010) Adaptive isogeometric analysis by local h-refinement with T-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:264-275
29. Haut Donahue TL, Dehlin W, Gillespie J, Weiss WJ, Rosenberg G (2009) Finite element analysis of stresses developed in the blood sac of a left ventricular assist device. Med Eng Phys 31: 454-460
30. Doyle MG, Vergniaud J-B, Tavoularis S, Bourgault Y (2008) Numerical simulations of blood flowin artificial and natural hearts with fluid-structure interaction. Artif Organs 32(11):870-879
31. Esmaily-Moghadam M, Migliavacca F, Vignon-Clementel IE, Hsia TY, Marsden AL (2012) Optimization of shunt placement for the norwood surgery using multi-domain modeling. J Biomed Eng 134: 5
32. Farhat C, Lesoinne M, Le Tallec P (1998) Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with nonmatching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelasticity. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 157:95-114
33. Hetzer R, Potapov EV, Stiller B et al (2006) Improvement in survival after mechanical circulatory support with pneumatic ventricula assist devices in pediatric patients. Annals Thorac Surg 82:917-925
34. Hsu M-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2012) Wind turbine aerodynamics using ALE-VMS: validation and the role of weakly enforced boundary conditions. Comput Mech. doi:10.1007/s00466-012-0686-x
35. HsuM-C, Akkerman I, Bazilevs Y (2013) Finite element simulation of wind turbine aerodynamics: validation study using NREL Phase VI experiment. Wind Energy. doi:10.1002/we.1599
36. Hsu M-C, Bazilevs Y (2012) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of wind turbines: simulating the full machine. Comput Mech 50:821-833
37. HsuM-C,BazilevsY, CaloVM,Tezduyar TE, HughesTJR (2010) Improving stability of stabilized and multiscale formulations in flowsimulations at small time steps. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:828-840
38. HughesTJR (1995) Multiscale phenomena: Green's functions, the Dirichlet-to-Neumann formulation, subgrid scale models, bubbles, and the origins of stabilized methods.Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 127:387-401
39. Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Balestra M (1986) A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuška-Brezzi condition: A stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:85-99
40. Hughes TJR, Liu WK, Zimmermann TK (1981) Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 29:329-349
41. Hughes TJR, Sangalli G (2007) Variational multiscale analysis: the fine-scale Green's function, projection, optimization, localization, and stabilized methods. SIAM J Numer Anal 45:539-557
42. Hughes TJR, Scovazzi G, Franca LP (2004) Multiscale and stabilized methods. In: Stein E, de Borst R, Hughes TJR (eds) Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, vol. 3, Fluids chapter 2. Wiley, New York
43. Hughes TJR, Tezduyar TE (1984) Finite element methods for first-order hyperbolic systems with particular emphasis on the compressible Euler equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 45:217-284
44. Jansen KE, Whiting CH, Hulbert GM (2000) A generalized-α method for integrating the filtered Navier-Stokes equations with a stabilized finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:305-319
45. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1994) Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 119:73-94
46. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE (1996) Simulation of multiple spheres falling in a liquid-filled tube. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 134:351-373
47. KalroV, Tezduyar TE (2000)Aparallel 3Dcomputationalmethod for fluid-structure interactions in parachute systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:321-332
48. Kiendl J, Bazilevs Y, Hsu M-C, Wüchner R, Bletzinger K-U (2010) The bending strip method for isogeometric analysis of Kirchhoff-Love shell structures comprised of multiple patches. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2403-2416
49. Kiendl J, Bletzinger K-U, Linhard J, Wüchner R (2009) Isogeometric shell analysis with Kirchhoff-Love elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3902-3914
50. Konig CS, Clark C, Mokhtarzadeh-Dehghan MR (1999) Investigation of unsteady flow in a model of a ventricular assist device by numerical modeling and comparison with experiment. Mech Eng Phys 21(1):53-64
51. Kuttler U, Forster C, Wall WA (2006) A solution for the incompressibility dilemma in partitioned fluid-structure interactionwith pure Dirichlet fluid domains. Comput Mech 38:417-429
52. Long CC, HsuM-C,BazilevsY, Feinstein JA, MarsdenAL (2012) Fluid-structure interaction simulations of the Fontan procedure using variable wall properties. Int J NumerMethods Biomed Eng 28:512-527
53. Marsden AL, Bernstein AD, Reddy VM, Shadden S, Spilker R, Chan FP, Taylor CA, Feinstein JA (2008) Evaluation of a novel Y-shaped extracardiac fontan baffle using computational fluid dynamics. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008. 06.043
54. Marsden AL, Feinstein JA, Taylor CA (2008) A computational framework for derivative-free optimization of cardiovascular geometries. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 197(21-24):1890-1905
55. MarsdenAL,Wang M, Dennis JE Jr, Moin P (2007) Trailing-edge noise reduction using derivative-free optimization and large-eddy simulation. J Fluid Mech 572:13-36
56. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE (1995) Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows-Fluid-structure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 21:933-953
57. Nguyen-Thanh N, Kiendl J, Nguyen-Xuan H, Wüchner R, Bletzinger KU, Bazilevs Y, Rabczuk T (2011) Rotation-free isogeometric thin shell analysis using PHT-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:3410-3424
58. Nordbeck S, Rystedt B (1967) Computer cartography point-inpolygon programs. BIT Numer Math 7:39-64
59. Oñate E, Flores FG (2005) Advances in the formulation of the rotation-free basic shell triangle. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:2406-2443
60. Oñate E, Zarate F (2000) Rotation-free triangular plate and shell elements. Int J Numer Methods Eng 47:557-603
61. Piegl L, TillerW(1997) The NURBS book (monographs in visual communication), 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
62. Roszelle BN, Deutsch S, Weiss WJ, Manning KB (2011) Flow visualization of a pediatric ventricular assist device during stroke volume reductions related to weaning. J Biomech Eng 39(7):2046-2058
63. Saad Y, Schultz M (1986) GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 7:856-869
64. Sankaran S,AudetC,MarsdenAL(2010)Amethod for stochastic constrained optimization using derivative-free surrogate pattern search and collocation. J Comput Phys 229(12):4664-4682
65. Sankaran S, Esmaily-Moghadam M, Kahn AM, Guccione J, Tseng E, Marsden AL (2012) Patient-specific multiscale modeling of blood flow for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Annals Biomed Eng 40(1):2228-2242
66. Sankaran S,Marsden AL (2011) A stochastic collocation method for uncertainty quantification in cardiovascular simulations. J Biomech Eng 133(3):031001
67. San Diego Supercomputing Center (SDSC). http://www.sdsc. edu/. Accessed 15 April 2013
68. Sengupta D, Kahn AM, Burns JC, Sankaran S, Shadden S, Marsden AL (2012) Image-based modeling of hemodynamics and coronary artery aneurysms caused by kawasaki disease. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11(6):915-932
69. Takizawa K, Bazilevs Y, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time and ALE-VMS techniques for patient-specific cardiovascular fluidstructure interaction modeling. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:171-225
70. Takizawa K, Brummer T, Tezduyar TE, Chen PR (2012) A comparative study based on patient-specific fluid-structure interaction modeling of cerebral aneurysms. J Appl Mech 79:010908
71. Takizawa K, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2010) Spacetime finite element computation of arterial fluid-structure interactions with patient-specific data. Int J Numer Methods Biomed Eng 26:101-116
72. Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J, Tezduyar TE (2010)Wall shear stress calculations in space-time finite element computation of arterial fluid-structure interactions. Comput Mech 46:31-41
73. Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Purdue J, McPhail T, Chen PR, Warren J, Tezduyar TE (2011) Patient-specific arterial fluidstructure interactionmodeling of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 65:308-323
74. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2011) Multiscale space-time fluidstructure interaction techniques. Comput Mech 48:247-267
75. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Computational methods for parachute fluid-structure interactions. Arch Comput Methods Eng 19:125-169
76. Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE (2012) Space-time fluid-structure interaction methods. Math Models Methods Appl Sci. doi:10.1142/S0218202512300013
77. Tezduyar T,Aliabadi S,BehrM, Johnson A, Mittal S (1993) Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 26(10):27-36
78. Tezduyar TE (1992) Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Adv Appl Mech 28: 1-44
79. Tezduyar TE (2001) Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Arch Comput Methods Eng 8:83-130
80. TezduyarTE(2003) Computation ofmoving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 43:555-575
81. Tezduyar TE (2007) Finite elements in fluids: special methods and enhanced solution techniques. Comput Fluids 36:207-223
82. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involvingmoving boundaries and interfaces-The deforming-spatial- domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):339-351
83. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA (1992) Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods-space-time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. In: New methods in transient analysis PVP-vol. 246/AMD-vol. 143, pp 7-24, ASME, New York
84. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J (1992) A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 94(3):353-371
85. Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R (1992) Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-orderinterpolation velocity-pressure elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 95:221-242
86. Tezduyar TE, Osawa Y (2000) Finite element stabilization parameters computed from element matrices and vectors. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 190:411-430
87. Tezduyar TE, Park YJ (1986) Discontinuity capturing finite element formulations for nonlinear convection-diffusion-reaction equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 59:307-325
88. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S (2007) Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:855-900
89. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Cragin T, Nanna B, Conklin BS, Pausewang J, Schwaab M (2007) Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: arterial fluidmechanics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 54:901-922
90. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2004) Space-time techniques for finite element computation of flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In: Gallegos S, Herrera I, Botello S, Zarate F, Ayala G (eds) Proceedings of the III International Congress onNumerical Methods in Engineering and Applied Science. CD-ROM, Monterrey, Mexico
91. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K (2006) Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:2002-2027
92. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Pausewang J, Schwaab M, Christopher J, Crabtree J (2008) Interface projection techniques for fluidstructure interactionmodeling with moving-mesh methods. Comput Mech 43:39-49
93. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS (2008) Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space-time fluid-structure interaction technique. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 57:601-629
94. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K (2006) Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:5743-5753
95. Tezduyar TE, Schwaab M, Sathe S (2009) Sequentially-coupled arterial fluid-structure interaction (SCAFSI) technique. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198:3524-3533
96. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Brummer T, Chen PR (2011) Spacetime fluid-structure interaction modeling of patient-specific cerebral aneurysms. Int J NumerMethods Biomed Eng 27:1665-1710
97. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Multiscale sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique. Comput Mech 46:17-29
98. Tezduyar TE, Takizawa K, Moorman C, Wright S, Christopher J (2010) Space-time finite element computation of complex fluidstructure interactions. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 64:1201-1218
99. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid-structure interactions with the deforming-spatial-domain/stabilized space-time formulation. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195:1885-1895
100. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE (2006) Fluid-structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Comput Mech 38:482-490
101. Zhiliang X, Chen N, Malgorzata MK, Elliot DR, Mark A (2008) A multiscale model of thrombus development. J R Soc Interface 5:705-722
102. Zhiliang X, Chen N, Shadden SC, Marsden JE, Malgorzata MK, Elliot DR, Mark A (2009) Study of blood flow impact on growth of thrombi using a multiscale model. Soft Matter 5(4):769-779
103. YangW, Feinstein JA, Marsden AL (2010) Constrained optimization of an idealized y-shaped baffle for the fontan surgery at rest and exercise. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199:2135-2149