Space-time finite element computation of arterial fluid-structure interactions with patient-specific data

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 101-116

  Takizawa, Kenji ^a   Christopher, Jason ^a   Tezduyar, Tayfun E ^a   Sathe, Sunil ^a  

^a Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular fluid mechanics; Cerebral aneurysms; Fluid structure interactions; Hyperelastic material; Patient specific data; Space time methods

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL GEOMETRY; ARTERIAL WALL; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DATA SPACE; HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS; MAPPING TECHNIQUES; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; NON-CIRCULAR; PATIENT-SPECIFIC DATA; SPACE TIME FINITE ELEMENT; SPACE-TIME FORMULATION; VELOCITY PROFILES;

BLOOD VESSELS; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTACTS (FLUID MECHANICS); ELASTICITY; FLOW SIMULATION; FLUID MECHANICS; FLUIDS; HEMODYNAMICS;

FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

EID: 77951767091     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1241     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Influence of wall elasticity on image-based blood flow simulation. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal Series A 2004; 70:1224-1231 (in Japanese).
2. Gerbeau JF, Vidrascu M, Frey P. Fluid-structure interaction in blood flow on geometries based on medical images. Computers and Structures 2005; 83:155-165.
3. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Computer modeling of cardiovascular fluid-structure interactions with the Deforming-Spatial-Domain/Stabilized Space-Time formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:1885-1895.
4. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of aneurysmal conditions with high and normal blood pressures. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:482-490.
5. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR. Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction analysis with applications to arterial blood flow. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:310-322.
6. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Influence of wall elasticity in patient-specific hemodynamic simulations. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:160-168.
7. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Cragin T, Nanna B, Conklin BS, Pausewang J, Schwaab M. Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: arterial fluid mechanics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 54:901-922.
8. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Numerical investigation of the effect of hypertensive blood pressure on cerebral aneurysm-dependence of the effect on the aneurysm shape. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 54:995-1009.
9. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Schwaab M, Conklin BS. Arterial fluid mechanics modeling with the stabilized space-time fluid-structure interaction technique. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2008; 57:601-629.
10. Bazilevs Y, Calo VM, Hughes TJR, Zhang Y. Isogeometric fluid-structure interaction: theory, algorithms, and computations. Computational Mechanics 2008; 43:3-37.
11. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of a patient-specific cerebral aneurysm: influence of structural modeling. Computational Mechanics 2008; 43:151-159.
12. Tezduyar TE, Schwaab M, Sathe S. Sequentially-coupled arterial fluid-s-structure interaction (SCAFSI) technique. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, July 2008, published online. DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2008.05.024.
13. Torii R, Oshima M, Kobayashi T, Takagi K, Tezduyar TE. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of blood flow and cerebral aneurysm: significance of artery and aneurysm shapes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, July 2008; published online. DOI:10.1016/j.cma.2008.08.020.
14. Tezduyar T, Aliabadi S, Behr M, Johnson A, Mittal S. Parallel finite-element computation of 3D flows. Computer 1993; 26:27-36.
15. Tezduyar TE, Aliabadi SK, Behr M, Mittal S. Massively parallel finite element simulation of compressible and incompressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 119:157-177.
16. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE. Massively parallel finite element computation of incompressible flows involving fluid-body interactions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 112:253-282.
17. Mittal S, Tezduyar TE. Parallel finite element simulation of 3D incompressible flows-fluid-structure interactions. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 1995; 21:933-953.
18. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE. Advanced mesh generation and update methods for 3D flow simulations. Computational Mechanics 1999; 23:130-143.
19. Kalro V, Tezduyar TE. A parallel 3D computational method for fluid-structure interactions in parachute systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 190:321-332.
20. Stein K, Benney R, Kalro V, Tezduyar TE, Leonard J, Accorsi M. Parachute fluid-structure interactions: 3-D computation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2000; 190:373-386.
21. Tezduyar T, Osawa Y. Fluid-structure interactions of a parachute crossing the far wake of an aircraft. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 191:717-726.
22. Ohayon R. Reduced symmetric models for modal analysis of internal structural-acoustic and hydroelastic-sloshing systems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2001; 190:3009-3019.
23. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K. Space-time techniques for finite element computation of flows with moving boundaries and interfaces. In Proceedings of the III International Congress on Numerical Methods in Engineering and Applied Science, CD-ROM, Monterrey, Mexico, Gallegos S, Herrera I, Botello S, Zarate F, Ayala G (eds), 2004.
24. van Brummelen EH, de Borst R. On the nonnormality of subiteration for a fluid-structure interaction problem. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2005; 27:599-621.
25. Michler C, van Brummelen EH, de Borst R. An interface Newton-Krylov solver for fluid-structure interaction. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2005; 47:1189-1195.
26. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Keedy R, Stein K. Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:2002-2027.
27. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K. Solution techniques for the fully-discretized equations in computation of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time formulations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:5743-5753.
28. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, Stein K, Aureli L. Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time techniques, In Fluid-Structure Interaction, Bungartz HJ, Schafer M (eds). Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 53. Springer: Berlin, 2006; 50-81.
29. Dettmer W, Peric D. A computational framework for fluid-structure interaction: finite element formulation and applications. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:5754-5779.
30. Khurram RA, Masud A. A multiscale/stabilized formulation of the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations for moving boundary flows and fluid-structure interaction. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:403-416.
31. Kuttler U, Forster C, Wall WA. A solution for the incompressibility dilemma in partitioned fluid-structure interaction with pure Dirichlet fluid domains. Computational Mechanics 2006; 38:417-429.
32. Lohner R, Cebral JR, Yang C, Baum JD, Mestreau EL, Soto O. Extending the range of applicability of the loose coupling approach for FSI simulations, In Fluid-Structure Interaction, Bungartz HJ, Schafer M (eds). Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 53. Springer: Berlin, 2006; 82-100.
33. Bletzinger KU, Wuchner R, Kupzok A. Algorithmic treatment of shells and free form-membranes in FSI. In Fluid-Structure Interaction, Bungartz HJ, Schafer M (eds). Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 53, Springer: Berlin, 2006; 336-355.
34. Masud A, Bhanabhagvanwala M, Khurram RA. An adaptive mesh rezoning scheme for moving boundary flows and fluid-structure interaction. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:77-91.
35. Sawada T, Hisada T. Fluid-structure interaction analysis of the two dimensional flag-in-wind problem by an interface tracking ALE finite element method. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:136-146.
36. Wall WA, Genkinger S, Ramm E. A strong coupling partitioned approach for fluid-structure interaction with free surfaces. Computers and Fluids 2007; 36:169-183.
37. Tezduyar TE, Sathe S. Modeling of fluid-structure interactions with the space-time finite elements: solution techniques. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2007; 54:855-900.
38. Kuttler U, Wall WA. Fixed-point fluid-structure interaction solvers with dynamic relaxation. Computational Mechanics 2008; 43:61-72.
39. Dettmer WG, Peric D. On the coupling between fluid flow and mesh motion in the modelling of fluid-structure interaction. Computational Mechanics 2008; 43:81-90.
40. Tezduyar TE. Stabilized finite element formulations for incompressible flow computations. Advances in Applied Mechanics 1992; 28:1-44.
41. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Liou J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: I. The concept and the preliminary numerical tests. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 94:339-351.
42. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Liou J. A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces-the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure: II. Computation of free-surface flows two-liquid flows and flows with drifting cylinders. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 94:353-371.
43. Tezduyar TE. Computation of moving boundaries and interfaces and stabilization parameters. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 2003; 43:555-575.
44. Hughes TJR, Brooks AN. A multi-dimensional upwind scheme with no crosswind diffusion. In Finite Element Methods for Convection Dominated Flows, Hughes TJR (ed.), AMD, vol. 34. ASME: New York, 1979; 19-35.
45. Brooks AN, Hughes TJR. Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1982; 32:199-259.
46. Tezduyar TE, Mittal S, Ray SE, Shih R. Incompressible flow computations with stabilized bilinear and linear equal-order-interpolation velocity-pressure elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1992; 95:221-242.
47. Hughes TJR, Franca LP, Balestra M. A new finite element formulation for computational fluid dynamics: V. Circumventing the Babuška-Brezzi condition: a stable Petrov-Galerkin formulation of the Stokes problem accommodating equal-order interpolations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1986; 59:85-99.
48. Tezduyar TE, Behr M, Mittal S, Johnson AA. Computation of unsteady incompressible flows with the finite element methods-space-time formulations, iterative strategies and massively parallel implementations. New Methods in Transient Analysis, PVP, vol. 246/AMD, vol. 143. ASME: New York, 1992; 7-24.
49. Johnson AA, Tezduyar TE. Mesh update strategies in parallel finite element computations of flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1994; 119:73-94.
50. Tezduyar TE. Finite element methods for flow problems with moving boundaries and interfaces. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2001; 8:83-130.
51. Tezduyar TE. Finite element methods for fluid dynamics with moving boundaries and interfaces, In Encyclopedia of Computational Mechanics, Volume 3: Fluids, Chapter 17, Stein E, DeBorst R, Hughes TJR (eds). Wiley: New York, 2004.
52. Tezduyar TE, Cragin T, Sathe S, Nanna B. FSI computations in arterial fluid mechanics with estimated zeropressure arterial geometry, In Marine 2007, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, Onate E, Garcia J, Bergan P, Kvamsdal T (eds), 2007.
53. Tezduyar TE, Schwaab M, Sathe S. Arterial fluid mechanics with the sequentially-coupled arterial FSI technique. In Coupled Problems 2007, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, Onate E, Papadrakakis M, Schrefler B (eds), 2007.
54. Womersley JR. Method for the calculation of velocity, rate of flow and viscous drag in arteries when the pressure gradient is known. Journal of Physiology 1955; 127:553-563.
55. Saad Y, Schultz M. GMRES: a generalized minimal residual algorithm for solving nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing 1986; 7:856-869.
56. Huang H, Virmani R, Younis H, Burke AP, Kamm RD, Lee RT. The impact of calcification on the biomechanical stability of atherosclerotic plaques. Circulation 2001; 103:1051-1056.
57. Otto F. Die grundform des arteriellen pulses. Zeitung fur Biologie 1899; 37:483-586.
58. Hilber HM, Hughes TJR, Taylor RL. Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1977; 5:283-292.