International and domestic co-publishing and their citation impact in different disciplines

Scientometrics

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 823-839

  Puuska, Hanna Mari ^a,b   Muhonen, Reetta ^a   Leino, Yrjö ^b  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b CSC Scientific Computing Ltd   (Finland)

Author keywords

Citation impact; Co publishing; Research collaboration; Research policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892878369     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-013-1181-7     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: a network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829-846.
2. European Commission. (2008). A more research-intensive and integrated European Research Area. Science, Technology and Competitiveness. Luxembourg: European Commission.
3. Finnish Ministry of Education. (2004). Management and Steering of Higher Education in Finland. Publications from the Finnish Ministry of Education 2004: 20.
4. Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture. (2012). Report from the Finnish Citation Index Working Group II. Finnish research organizations' publications and citations in the Web of Science, 1990-2009. Publications from the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture 2018: 18.
5. Frame, J., & Carpenter, M. P. (1979). International Research Collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 9(4), 481-497.
6. Glänzel, W. (2001). National characteristics in international scientific co-authorship relations. Scientometrics, 51(1), 69-115.
7. Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2001). Double effort = Double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics, 50(2), 199-214.
8. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'Periphery Effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 57(3), 321-337.
9. Gossart, C., & Özman, M. (2009). Co-authorship networks in social sciences: The case of Turkey. Scientometrics, 78(2), 323-345.
10. Hakala, J. (1998). Internationalisation of Science: Views of the Scientific Elite in Finland. Science Studies, 11(1), 52-74.
11. Herbertz, H. (1995). Does it pay to Cooperate? A bibliometric case-study in molecular-biology. Scientometrics, 33(1), 117-122.
12. Himanen, L., Auranen, O., Puuska, H.-M., & Nieminen, M. (2009). Influence of research funding and science policy on university research performance: a comparison of five countries. Science and Public Policy, 36(6), 419-430.
13. Hsu, J., & Huang, D. (2011). Correlation between impact and collaboration. Scientometrics, 86(2), 317-324.
14. Katz, J. S. (2012). Scale-Independent Measures: Theory and Practice. Paper presented at the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, September 5-8, Montreal, Canada.
15. Katz, J., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
16. Kaukonen, E., Miettinen, M., Piirainen, T., Puuska, H.-M., & Vuolanto, P. (2009). Internationalisation of university research: Practices and problems, in: Ahonen, P.-P., Hjelt, M., Kaukonen, E., & Vuolanto, P. (Eds), Internationalisation of Finnish scientific research. Publications of the Academy of Finland 7/09, pp. 91-122.
17. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
18. Kyvik, S. (1991). Productivity in academia: Scientific publishing at Norwegian universities. Rådet for samfunnsvitenskapelig forskning, NAVF.
19. Lancho-Barrantes, B. S., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegon, F. (2010). What lies behind the averages and significance of citation indicators in different disciplines? Journal of Information Science, 36(3), 371-382.
20. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, E. (2006). Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities. Scientometrics, 68(3), 519-533.
21. Laudel, G. (2001). Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7-8), 762-781.
22. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55(5), 438-443.
23. Lundberg, J. (2007). Lifting the crown: Citation z-score. Journal of Informetrics, 1(2), 145-154.
24. Luukkonen, T., Persson, O., & Sivertsen, G. (1992). Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(1), 101-126.
25. Moed, H. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
26. Moed, H., de Bruin, R., & van Leeuwen, T. (1995). New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications. Scientometrics, 33(3), 381-422.
27. Muhonen, R., Puuska, H.-M., & Leino, Y. (2012). International co-publishing in Finland. Reports of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2012: 19.
28. Must, U. (2012). Alone or together: Examples from history research. Scientometrics, 91(2), 527-537.
29. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics, 21(3), 313-323.
30. Nederhof, A. J., & Visser, M. S. (2004). Qualitative deconstructions of citation impact indicators. Waxing field impact but waning journal impact. Journal of Documentation, 60(6), 668-672.
31. NordForsk. (2010). International Research Cooperation in the Nordic countries. A Publication from the NORIA-net "The Use of bibliometrics in research policy and evaluation activities".
32. OECD. (2012). Main Science and Technology Indicators. Key Figures. Volume 2012/1. OECD.
33. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-423.
34. Persson, O., Luukkonen, T., & Hälikkä, S. (2000). A bibliometric study of Finnish science. VTT, Group for Technology Studies Working Papers No. 48/00.
35. Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2008). Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3), 361-377.
36. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1990). International collaboration in the sciences, 1981-1985. Scientometrics, 19(1-2), 3-10.
37. Schubert, T., & Sooryamoorthy, R. (2010). Can the centre-periphery model explain patterns of international scientific collaboration among threshold and industrialised countries? The case of South Africa and Germany. Scientometrics, 83(1), 181-203.
38. Sooryamoorthy, R. (2009). Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics, 81(1), 177-193.
39. van Raan, A. (1997). Science as an international enterprise. Science and Public Policy, 24(5), 290-300.
40. van Raan, A. (1998). The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results: Some simple mathematical considerations concerning the role of self-citations. Scientometrics, 42(3), 423-428.
41. Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press Inc.