Temporal and spectral profiles of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict processing

NeuroImage

Volumn 89, Issue , 2014, Pages 280-288

  Wang, Kai ^a,b   Li, Qi ^a   Zheng, Ya ^a,b,c   Wang, Hongbin ^d   Liu, Xun ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PSYCHOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^c DALIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BETA RHYTHM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; NEUROMODULATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMON TASK; SPECTROSCOPY; STIMULUS RESPONSE CONFLICT; STIMULUS STIMULUS CONFLICT; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; THETA RHYTHM; TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; ALPHA RHYTHM; BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE; MENTAL TASK; PERCEPTION; RESPONSE TIME; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; STROOP TEST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892871205     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.045     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baker S.N. Oscillatory interactions between sensorimotor cortex and the periphery. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2007, 17(6):649-655.
2. Botvinick M.M., Braver T.S., Barch D.M., Carter C.S., Cohen J.D. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108(3):624-652.
3. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D., Carter C.S. Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8(12):539-546.
4. Cavanagh J.F., Cohen M.X., Allen J.J. Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(1):98-105.
5. De Jong R., Liang C.C., Lauber E. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1994, 20(4):731-750.
6. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134(1):9-21.
7. Donchin E., Coles M.G.H. Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating?. Behav. Brain Sci. 1988, 11(3):357-427.
8. Egner T. Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12(10):374-380.
9. Egner T., Hirsch J. Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nat. Neurosci. 2005, 8(12):1784-1790.
10. Eriksen B.A., Eriksen C.W. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept. Psychophys. 1974, 16(1):143-149.
11. Fan J., Kolster R., Ghajar J., Suh M., Knight R.T., Sarkar R., et al. Response anticipation and response conflict: an event-related potential and functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(9):2272-2282.
12. Folstein J.R., Van Petten C. Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review. Psychophysiology 2008, 45(1):152-170.
13. Fruhholz S., Godde B., Finke M., Herrmann M. Spatio-temporal brain dynamics in a combined stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response conflict task. Neuroimage 2011, 54(1):622-634.
14. Hanslmayr S., Pastotter B., Bauml K.H., Gruber S., Wimber M., Klimesch W. The electrophysiological dynamics of interference during the Stroop task. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(2):215-225.
15. Heil M., Osman A., Wiegelmann J., Rolke B., Hennighausen E. N200 in the Eriksen-task: inhibitory executive processes?. J. Psychophysiol. 2000, 14(4):218-225.
16. Hommel B. Interactions between stimulus-stimulus congruence and stimulus-response compatibility. Psychological Research 1997, 59(4):248-260.
17. Ila A.B., Polich J. P300 and response time from a manual Stroop task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1999, 110(2):367-373.
18. Jensen O., Gelfand J., Kounios J., Lisman J.E. Oscillations in the alpha band (9-12Hz) increase with memory load during retention in a short-term memory task. Cereb. Cortex 2002, 12(8):877-882.
19. Klimesch W., Schack B., Sauseng P. The functional significance of theta and upper alpha oscillations. Exp. Psychol. 2005, 52(2):99-108.
20. Kopp B., Rist F., Mattler U. N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology 1996, 33(3):282-294.
21. Kornblum S. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: the case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research 1994, 56(3):130-135.
22. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy. Psychol. Rev. 1990, 97(2):253-270.
23. Kornblum S., Stevens G.T., Whipple A., Requin J. The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1999, 25(3):688-714.
24. Leuthold H. The Simon effect in cognitive electrophysiology: a short review. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 2011, 136(2):203-211.
25. Liotti M., Woldorff M.G., Perez R., Mayberg H.S. An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38(5):701-711.
26. Liu X., Banich M.T., Jacobson B.L., Tanabe J.L. Common and distinct neural substrates of attentional control in an integrated Simon and spatial Stroop task as assessed by event-related fMRI. Neuroimage 2004, 22(3):1097-1106.
27. Liu X., Park Y., Gu X., Fan J. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 2010, 72(6):1710-1720.
28. Luu P., Tucker D.M., Makeig S. Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115(8):1821-1835.
29. Makeig S., Debener S., Onton J., Delorme A. Mining event-related brain dynamics. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8(5):204-210.
30. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2003, 7(3):134-140.
31. Nee D.E., Wager T.D., Jonides J. Interference resolution: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging tasks. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2007, 7(1):1-17.
32. Neuper C., Pfurtscheller G. Evidence for distinct beta resonance frequencies in human EEG related to specific sensorimotor cortical areas. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2001, 112(11):2084-2097.
33. Nigbur R., Cohen M.X., Ridderinkhof K.R., Sturmer B. Theta dynamics reveal domain-specific control over stimulus and response conflict. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24(5):1264-1274.
34. Nigbur R., Ivanova G., Sturmer B. Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122(11):2185-2194.
35. Ridderinkhof K.R., Ullsperger M., Crone E.A., Nieuwenhuis S. The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004, 306(5695):443-447.
36. Roach B.J., Mathalon D.H. Event-related EEG time-frequency analysis: an overview of measures and an analysis of early gamma band phase locking in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Bull. 2008, 34(5):907-926.
37. Sauseng P., Griesmayr B., Freunberger R., Klimesch W. Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34(7):1015-1022.
38. Sauseng P., Klimesch W., Freunberger R., Pecherstorfer T., Hanslmayr S., Doppelmayr M. Relevance of EEG alpha and theta oscillations during task switching. Exp. Brain Res. 2006, 170(3):295-301.
39. Simon J.R., Berbaum K. Effect of conflicting cues on information processing: the 'Stroop effect' vs. the 'Simon effect'. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 1990, 73(2):159-170.
40. Simon J.R., Rudell A.P. Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J. Appl. Psychol. 1967, 51(3):300-304.
41. Stoffels E.J., van der Molen M.W. Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm. Percept. Psychophys. 1988, 44(1):7-14.
42. Stroop J.R. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exp. Psychol. 1935, 18(6):643-662.
43. Tillman C.M., Wiens S. Behavioral and ERP indices of response conflict in Stroop and flanker tasks. Psychophysiology 2011, 48(10):1405-1411.
44. Treccani B., Cubelli R., Sala S.D., Umilta C. Flanker and Simon effects interact at the response selection stage. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove) 2009, 62(9):1-21.
45. Valle-Inclan F. The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study. Biol. Psychol. 1996, 43(2):147-162.
46. Van 't Ent D. Perceptual and motor contributions to performance and ERP components after incorrect motor activation in a flanker reaction task. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2002, 113(2):270-283.
47. van Veen V., Carter C.S. The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies. Physiol. Behav. 2002, 77(4-5):477-482.
48. van Veen V., Carter C.S. The timing of action-monitoring processes in the anterior cingulate cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2002, 14(4):593-602.
49. West R., Alain C. Event-related neural activity associated with the Stroop task. Cogn. Brain Res. 1999, 8(2):157-164.
50. Zhang J., Kornblum S. Distributional analysis and De Jong, Liang, and Lauber's (1994) dual-process model of the Simon effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1997, 23(5):1543-1551.
51. Zhang Y., Chen Y., Bressler S.L., Ding M. Response preparation and inhibition: the role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm. Neuroscience 2008, 156(1):238-246.