Validity evidence based on test content;Evidencia de validez basada en el contenido del test

Psicothema

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 100-107

  Sireci, Stephen ^a   Faulkner Bond, Molly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

Alignment; Content validity; Test development; Testing standards; Validation; Validity

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MATHEMATICS; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

DATA COLLECTION; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMANS; MATHEMATICS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; VALIDATION STUDIES AS TOPIC;

EID: 84892852983     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: 1886144X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7334/psicothema2013.256     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Aiken, L.R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40, 955-959.
2. American Psychological Association (1954). Technical recommendations for psychological tests and diagnostic techniques. Psychological Bulletin, 51 (2, supplement).
3. American Psychological Association (1966). Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, D.C.: Author.
4. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1974). Standards for educational and psychological tests. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
5. American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
6. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
7. Bhola, D.S., Impara, J.C., & Buckendahl, C.W. (2003). Aligning tests with states' content standards: Methods and issues. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(3), 21-29.
8. CCSSO SEC Collaborative Project (2005). Surveys of Enacted Curriculum: A Guide for SEC Collaborative State and Local Coordinators. Washington, D.C.: Council of Chief State School Officers.
9. Crocker, L.M., Miller, D., & Franks E.A. (1989). Quantitative methods for assessing the fit between test and curriculum. Applied Measurement in Education, 2, 179-194.
10. Cronbach, L.J., & Meehl, P.E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302.
11. D'Agostino, J., Karpinski, A., & Welsh, M. (2011). A method to examine content domain structures. International Journal of Testing, 11(4), 295-307.
12. Davis-Becker, S.L., & Buckendahl, C.W. (2013). A proposed framework for evaluating alignment studies. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 32(1), 23-33. doi:10.1111/emip.12002.
13. Ebel, R.L. (1956). Obtaining and reporting evidence for content validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 269-282.
14. Ebel, R.L. (1977). Comments on some problems of employment testing. Personnel Psychology, 30, 55-63.
15. Flowers, C., Wakeman, S., Browder, D.M., & Karvonen, M. (2009). Links for Academic Learning (LAL): A conceptual model for investigating alignment of alternate assessments based on alternate achievement standards. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(1), 25-37. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.01134.x.
16. Kane, M. (1994). Validating the performance standards associated with passing scores. Review of Educational Research, 64(3), 425-461.
17. Lane, S. (2014). Validity evidence based on testing consequences. Psicothema, 26, 127-135.
18. Lennon, R.T. (1956). Assumptions underlying the use of content validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 16, 294-304.
19. Martone, A., & Sireci, S.G. (2009). Evaluating alignment between curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1332-1361.
20. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-100). Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
21. Mislevy, R.J. (2009, February). Validity from the perspective of modelbased reasoning. CRESST report 752. Los Angeles: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
22. Mislevy, R.J., & Riconscente, M.M. (2006). Evidence-centered assessment design. In S.M. Downing & T.M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 61-90), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
23. Oren, C., Kennet-Cohen, T., Turvall, E., & Allalouf, A. (2014). Demonstrating the validity of three general scores of PET in predicting higher education achievement in Israel. Psicothema, 26, 117-126.
24. Padilla, J.L., & Benítez, I. (2014). Validity evidence based on response processes. Psicothema, 26, 136-144.
25. Porter, A.C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14.
26. Porter, A.C., & Smithson, J.L. (2001). Defining, developing, and using curriculum indicators. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania, Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Retrieved from http:// www.cpre.org/sites/default/files/researchreport/788_rr48.pdf.
27. Raymond, M.R. (2001). Job analysis and the specification of content for licensure and certification exams. Applied Measurement in Education, 14, 369-415.
28. Rios, J., & Wells, C. (2014). Validity evidence based on internal structure. Psicothema, 26, 108-116.
29. Rothman, R., Slattery, J.B., Vranek, J.L., & Resnick, L.B. (2002). Benchmarking and Alignment of Standards and Testing (Technical Report No. 566). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Retrieved from http://www.cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/TR566.pdf.
30. Sireci, S.G. (1998a). Gathering and analyzing content validity data. Educational Assessment, 5, 299-321.
31. Sireci, S.G. (1998b). The construct of content validity. Social Indicators Research, 45, 83-117.
32. Sireci, S.G. (2009). Packing and upacking sources of validity evidence: History repeats itself again. In R. Lissitz (Ed.), The Concept of Validity: Revisions, New Directions and Applications (pp. 19-37). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
33. Webb, N. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. National Institute for Science Education Madison, WI. Retrieved from http://facstaff.wceruw.org/ normw/WEBBMonograph6criteria.pdf.
34. Yalow, E.S., & Popham, W.J. (1983). Content validity at the crossroads. Educational Researcher, 12, 10-14.