Online social networking sites-a novel setting for health promotion?

Health and Place

Volumn 26, Issue , 2014, Pages 161-170

  Loss, Julika ^a   Lindacher, Verena ^a   Curbach, Janina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Facebook; Healthy settings; Internet; Settings approach; Social media

Indexed keywords

HEALTH IMPACT; INTERNET; SOCIAL IMPACT; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; ONLINE SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; WELLBEING; FEMALE; MALE; PROCEDURES; SOCIAL MEDIA;

FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; SOCIAL MEDIA; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84892851755     PISSN: 13538292     EISSN: 18732054     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Apatu E.J., Alperin M., Miner K.R., Wiljer D. A drive through Web 2.0: an exploration of driving safety promotion on Facebook. Health Promot. Pract. 2013, 14:88-95.
2. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 1969, 35:216-224.
3. Baric, L., Conrad, G., 1999. Gesundheitsförderung in setting. Verlag für Gesundheitsförderung, Gamburg, Germany.
4. Barker R.G. Ecological Psychology. Concepts and Methods for Studying the Environment of Human Behavior 1968, University of California Press, Stanford.
5. Bennett G.G., Glasgow R.E. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2009, 30:273-292.
6. Boyd D.M., Ellison N.B. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. J. Comp. Mediat. Commun. 2007, 13:11.
7. Bracht N., Tsouros N. Principles and strategies of effective community participation. Health Promot. Int. 1990, 5:199-208.
8. Brandtzaeg P.B., Heim J. Why people use social networking sites. Online Communities, LNCS 5621 2009, 143-152. Springer, Berlin. A.A. Ozok, Z. Panayiotis (Eds.).
9. Brenner, J., Smith, A., 2013. Report Social Networking. In: Pew Research Center (Ed.), Proceedings of the Pew Internet and American Life Project, Washington.
10. Bull S.S., Breslin L.T., Wright E.E., Black S.R., Levine D.M., Santelli J.S. Case study: an ethics case study of HIV prevention research on Facebook: the just/us study. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2011, 36:1082-1092.
11. Bundeszentrale für gesundheitliche Aufklärung, 2003. Leitbegriffe der Gesundheitsförderung, 4 ed. Fachverlag Peter Sabo, Schwabenheim a. d. Selz.
12. Busemann K., Gscheidle C. Web 2.0: Habitualisierung der Social Communitys. Ergebnisse der ARD/ZDF-Onlinestudie 2012 (Web 2.0: habituation of social communities. Results of the ARD/ZDF Online Study 2012). Media Perspekt. 2012, 380-390.
13. Cassidy, J., 2012. Facebook: the ultimate dot-com. The New Yorker. Condé Nast, New York.
14. Centre for Health Promotion, Women's and Children's Health Network, 2012. Where they hang out. Social media use in youth health promotion. An analysis based on a literature review and survey of the youth sector in South Australia. Department of Health, Government of South Australia, Adelaide.
15. Chappell N.L., Funk L.M., Allan D. Defining community boundaries in health promotion research. Am. J. Health Promot. 2006, 21:119-126.
16. Collins D.C., Kearns R.A. The safe journeys of an enterprising school: negotiating landscapes of opportunity and risk. Health Place 2001, 7:293-306.
17. Collins D.C., Kearns R.A., Mitchell H. An integral part of the children's education: placing sun protection in Auckland primary schools. Health Place 2006, 12:436-448.
18. Daine K., Hawton K., Singaravelu V., Stewart A., Simkin S., Montgomery P. The power of the web: a systematic review of studies of the influence of the internet on self-harm and suicide in young people. PLoS One 2013, 8:e77555.
19. Dooris M. Joining up settings for health: a valuable investment for strategic partnerships?. Crit. Publ. Health 2004, 14:37-49.
20. Dooris M. Healthy settings: challenges to generating evidence of effectiveness. Health Promot. Int. 2006, 21:55-65.
21. Ebert, L., Feierabend, S., Karg, U., Rathgeb, T., 2011. JIM-Studie 2012. Jugend, Information, (Multi-) Media (JIM study 2012th Youth, Information, (multi-) media). Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, Stuttgart.
22. Egan K.G., Moreno M.A. Alcohol references on undergraduate males' Facebook profiles. Am. J. Mens Health 2011, 5:413-420.
23. Freeman B., Chapman S. Gone viral? Heard the buzz? A guide for public health practitioners and researchers on how Web 2.0 can subvert advertising restrictions and spread health information. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2008, 62:778-782.
24. Gillies P.J. Effectiveness of alliances and partnerships for health promotion. Health Promot. Int. 1998, 13:99-120.
25. Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life 1959, Doubleday & Company, New York.
26. Gold J., Pedrana A.E., Sacks-Davis R., Hellard M.E., Chang S., Howard S., Keogh L., Hocking J.S., Stoove M.A. A systematic examination of the use of online social networking sites for sexual health promotion. BMC Publ. Health 2011, 11:583.
27. Gold J., Pedrana A.E., Stoove M.A., Chang S., Howard S., Asselin J., Ilic O., Batrouney C., Hellard M.E. Developing health promotion interventions on social networking sites: recommendations from The FaceSpace Project. J. Med. Internet Res. 2012, 14:e30.
28. Green L.W., Poland B.D., Rootman I. The settings approach to health promotion. Settings for health promotion. Linking theory and practice 2000, 1-43. Sage, Thousand Oaks. B.D. Poland, L.W. Green, I. Rootman (Eds.).
29. Haglund, B., Pettersson, D., Finer, D., Tillgren, P., 1996. Creating Supportive Environments for Health: Stories from the 3rd International Conference on Health Promotion, Sundsvall, Sweden. WHO, Genf.
30. Hargittai E., Hsieh Y. From dabblers to omnivores: a typology of social network site usage. A Networked Self 2010, Routledge, London. Z. Papacharissi (Ed.).
31. Joinson, A.N., 2008. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Florence, Italy.
32. Jones B. Mixed uptake of social media among public health specialists. Bull. World Health Organ. 2011, 89:784-785.
33. Khan, U., 2008. Breastfeeding photo ban by Facebook sparks global protest by mothers. The Telegraph, Chatham.
34. King L. The settings approach to achieving better health for children. NSW Publ. Health Bull. 1998, 9:128-129.
35. Korda H., Itani Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot. Pract. 2013, 14:15-23.
36. Kreuter M.W., Lezin N.A., Young L.A. Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: implications for practitioners. Health Promot. Pract. 2000, 1:49-63.
37. Laverack G. Health activism. Foundations and strategies 2013, Sage, London.
38. Loss J., Lindacher V., Curbach J. Do social networking sites enhance the attractiveness of risky health behavior? Impression management in adolescents' communication on Facebook and its ethical implications. Publ. Health Ethics 2013, 6.
39. Mankoff J., Matthews D., Fussell S.R., Johnson M. Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. Hum. Comp. Interact. Inst. 2007, (Paper 47).
40. McCreanor T., Lyons A., Griffin C., Goodwin I., Moewaka Barnes H., Hutton F. Youth drinking cultures, social networking and alcohol marketing: Implications for public health. Crit. Publ. Health 2013, 23:110-120.
41. McLeroy K.R., Bibeau D., Steckler A., Glanz K. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ. Q 1988, 15:351-377.
42. Miniwatts Marketing Group, 2012a. Internet Usage in the European Union. Internet User Statistics and Population for the 27 European Union Member States.
43. Miniwatts Marketing Group, 2012b. Internet usage statistics. The Internet Big Picture. World Internet Users and Population Stats.
44. Moreno M.A., Briner L.R., Williams A., Brockman L., Walker L., Christakis D.A. A content analysis of displayed alcohol references on a social networking web site. J. Adolesc. Health 2010, 47:168-175.
45. Moreno M.A., Vanderstoep A., Parks M.R., Zimmerman F.J., Kurth A., Christakis D.A. Reducing at-risk adolescents' display of risk behavior on a social networking web site: a randomized controlled pilot intervention trial. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 2009, 163:35-41.
46. Nicholls J. Everyday, everywhere: alcohol marketing and social media--current trends. Alcohol Alcohol. 2012, 47:486-493.
47. Parcel G.S., Kelder S.H., Basen-Engquist K. The school as a setting for health promotion. Settings for Health Promotion. Linking Theory and Practice 2000, 86-120. Sage, Thousand Oaks. B.D. Poland, L.W. Green, I. Rootman (Eds.).
48. Pascoe C.J. Resource and risk: Youth sexuality and new media use. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 2011, 8:37-50.
49. Poland B. Smoking, stigma, and the purification of public space. Putting Health into Place: Making Connections in Geographical Research 1998, Syracuse University press, Syracuse, NY. R. Kearns, W. Gesler (Eds.).
50. Poland B., Krupa G., McCall D. Settings for health promotion: an analytic framework to guide intervention design and implementation. Health Promot. Pract. 2009, 10:505-516.
51. Raacke J., Bonds-Raacke J. MySpace and Facebook: applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. CyberPsychol. Behav. 2008, 11:169-174.
52. Rosenberg J., Egbert N. Online impression management: personlity traits and concerns for secondary goals as predictors of self-presentation tactics on Facebook. J. Comput. Medi. Commun. 2011, 17:1-18.
53. Schwarz, E.A.G., 2011. Political mobilization through online social networks. Current Research Society Movements Workshop Papers. University of California, Riverside.
54. Sisler J. Crowdfunding for medical expenses. CMAJ 2012, 184:E123-E124.
55. Sreberny A. New media and the Middlle East: thinking allowed. Int. Inst. J. Univ. Michigan 2012, 1:2-5.
56. Teufel M., Hofer E., Junne F., Sauer H., Zipfel S., Giel K.E. A comparative analysis of anorexia nervosa groups on Facebook. Eat Weight Disord. 2013.
57. Thackeray R., Neiger B.L., Hanson C.L., McKenzie J.F. Enhancing promotional strategies within social marketing programs: use of Web 2.0 social media. Health Promot. Pract. 2008, 9:338-343.
58. Thackeray R., Neiger B.L., Keller H. Integrating social media and social marketing: a four-step process. Health Promot. Pract. 2012, 13:165-168.
59. Ugander J., Karrer B., Backstrom L., Marlow C. The anatomy of the Facebook social graph. CoRR 2011, 1111:4503.
60. Urista M., Dong Q., Day K.D. Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human Commun. 2009, 12:215-229.
61. Valkenburg P.M., Peter J., Schouten A.P. Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 2006, 9:584-590.
62. Wallerstein, N., 2006. What is the evidence on effectiveness of empowerment to improve health?. WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Evidence Network Report), Copenhagen.
63. Wenzel E. A comment on settings in health promotion, Internet. J. Health Promot. International Union Health Promot. Educ. 1997, 1-13.
64. Whitelaw S., Baxendale A., Bryce C., MacHardy L., Young I., Witney E. 'Settings' based health promotion: a review. Health Promot. Int 2001, 16:339-353.
65. Wilson R.E., Gosling S.D., Graham L.T. A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 7:203-220.
66. World Health Organization Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion 1986, WHO, Europe, Copenhagen.
67. World Health Organization Health Promotion Glossary 1998, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland.
68. World Health Organization Introduction to Healthy Settings 2013, World Health Organization, Geneva.
69. Zakus J.D., Lysack C.L. Revisiting community participation. Health Policy Plan 1998, 13:1-12.
70. Zhao S., Grasmuck S., Martin J. Identity construction on Facebook: digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Comput. Human Behav. 2008, 24:1816-1836.
71. Zimmerman M.A. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am. J. Community Psychol. 1995, 23:581-599.
72. ™ and offline popularity from sociability and self-esteem, and mapping the meanings of popularity with semantic networks. J. Comput. Medi. Commun. 2008, 14:1-34.