Resources for the teacher from a semiotic mediation perspective

From Text to 'Lived' Resources: Mathematics Curriculum Materials and Teacher Development

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 59-75

  Mariotti, Maria Alessandra ^a   Maracci, Mirko ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PAVIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Artefact; Didactical cycle; Historic source; Instruments; Orchestration; Primary and secondary artefact; Semiotic mediation; Semiotic potential; Teacher s resource; Written texts

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892839533     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-1966-8_4     Document Type: Chapter

References (15)

1. Arzarello, F. (2006). Semiosis as a multimodal process. Relime V1, Especial, 267-299.
2. Bartolini Bussi, M. G. (1998). Verbal interaction in mathematics classroom: A Vygotskian analysis. In H. Steinbring, M. G. Bartolini Bussi, & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in mathematics classroom (pp. 65-84). Reston, VA: NCTM.
3. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 750-787). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
4. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Mariotti, M. A., & Ferri, F. (2005). Semiotic mediation in the primary school: Dürer glass. In M. H. G. Hoffmann, J. Lenhard, & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign - Grounding mathematics education. Festschrift for Michael Otte (pp. 77-90). New York: Springer.
5. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical, situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
6. Falcade, R. (2006). Théorie des Situations, médiation sémiotique et discussions collective, dans des séquences d’enseignement avec Cabri-Géomètre pour la construction des notions de fonction et graphe de fonction. Grenoble: Université J. Fourier, unpublished doctoral dissertation.
7. Falcade, R., Laborde, C., & Mariotti, M. A. (2007). Approaching functions: Cabri tools as instruments of semiotic mediation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(3), 317-333.
8. Hoyles, C. (1993). Microworlds/schoolworlds: The transformation of an innovation. In C. Keitel & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 1-17). NATO ASI Series. Berlin: Springer.
9. Jahnke, H. N., Arcavi, A., Barbin, E., Bekken, O., Furinghetti, F., Idrissi, A., et al. (2000). The use of original sources in mathematics classroom. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education. The ICMI study (pp. 291-328). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
10. Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V. S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (Eds.), Vygotsky’s educational theory in cultural context (pp. 15-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Laborde J.-M., & Bellemain, F. (1995). Cabri-géomètre II and Cabri-géomètre II plus [computer program]. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments and Grenoble/France: Cabrilog.
12. Mariotti, M. A., & Maracci, M. (2010). Un artefact comme outil de médiation sémiotique: une ressource pour le professeur. In G. Gueudet & L. Trouche (Eds.), Ressources vives. Le travail documentaire des professeurs en mathématiques (pp. 91-107). Rennes, France: Presses Universitaires de Rennes et INRP.
13. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students’ types of generalization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5(1), 37-70.
14. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
15. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Perception, representation, and the forms of action: Towards an historical epistemology. In M. Wartofsky (Ed.), Models, representation and the scientific understanding (pp. 188-209). Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.