Bio-electricity and land use in the Future Agricultural Resources Model (FARM)

Climatic Change

Volumn 123, Issue 3-4, 2014, Pages 719-730

  Sands, Ronald D ^a   Förster, Hannah ^b   Jones, Carol A ^a   Schumacher, Katja ^b  

^a ECONOMIC RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b Division Environmental Law and Governance Öko Institut   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; ECONOMICS; GLOBAL WARMING; LAND USE;

AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES; ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES; CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; CARBON DIOXIDE STORAGE; CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES; COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODEL; GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM MODELS;

ELECTRICITY;

EID: 84892834870     PISSN: 01650009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0943-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Avetisyan M, Baldos U, Hertel T (2011) Development of the GTAP Version 7 Land Use Data Base. GTAP Research Memorandum No. 19, Global Trade Analysis Project, Purdue University, https://www. gtap. agecon. purdue. edu/.
2. Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB (2010) Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(26): 12052-12057.
3. Choi S, Sohngen B, Rose S, Hertel T, Golub A (2011) Total factor productivity change in agriculture and emissions from deforestation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 93(2): 349-355.
4. Hertel TW (1997) Global trade analysis: Modeling and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York.
5. Hertel TW, Rose SK, Tol RSJ (2009) Land use in computable general equilibrium models: An overview. In: Hertel TW, Rose SK, Tol RSJ (eds) Economic analysis of land use in global climate change policy. Routledge, London, pp 3-30.
6. 2 greenhouse gas abatement. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Report No. 94.
7. Kriegler E, O'Neill BC, Hallegatte S, Kram T, Lempert RJ, Moss RH, Wilbanks T (2012) The need for and use of socio-economic scenarios for climate change analysis: a new approach based on shared socio-economic pathways. Global Environmental Change 22: 807-822.
8. Rutherford TF (2010) GTAP7inGAMS. Available at http://svn. mpsge. org/GTAP7inGAMS/doc/.
9. 2 mitigation in a global context: Welfare, trade and land use. Special issue of The Energy Journal, forthcoming.
10. Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK (2008) Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(2): 464-469.
11. Schumacher K, Sands RD (2007) Where are the industrial technologies in energy-economy models? An innovative CGE approach to steel production in Germany. Energy Economics 29: 799-825.
12. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2011) World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, CD-ROM Edition.
13. Williams JH, DeBenedictis A, Ghanadan R, Mahone A, Moore J, Morrow III WR, Price S, Torn MS (2013) The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: The pivotal role of electricity. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Paper LBNL-5529E.
14. 2 concentration for land use and energy. Science 324: 1183-1186.