Essentials of computer-based diagnostics of learning and cognition

Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 3-14

  Seel, Norbert M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computational intelligence; Knowledge assessment; Representation; WEB 3.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892804620     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-5662-0_1     Document Type: Chapter

References (34)

1. Aebli, H. (1981). Denken: Das ordnen des Tuns. Band II: Denkprozesse. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. [Thinking: Sequencing of doing]
2. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture ofcognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Brebner, J. M. T., & Welford, A. T. (1980). Introduction: An historical background sketch. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 1-23). New York: Academic Press.
4. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts ofmeaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Clark, R. E. (2006). Not knowing what we don't know: Reframing the importance of automated knowledge for educational research. In G. Clarebout & J. Elen (Eds.), Avoiding simplicity, confronting complexity. Advances in studying and designing (computer-based) powerful learning environments (pp. 3-14). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
6. Donders, F. C. (1869). On the speed of mental processes. In W. G. Koster (Ed.) (1969), /Attention a Performance II. Acta Psychologica, 30/, 412-431. (Original work published in 1868.)
7. Frost, R. A. (1986). Introduction to knowledge base systems. London: Collins.
8. Goodman, N. (1968). Languages ofart. An approach to a theory ofsymbols. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Comp.
9. Gordon, A. D., & Jupp, P. E. (1989). The construction and assessment of mental maps. British Journal ofMathematical and Statistical Psychology, 42, 169-182.
10. Hambleton, R. K., & Zaal, J. N. (Eds.). (1991). Advances in educational and psychological testing. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Helbig, H. (2006). Knowledge representation and the semantics of natural language. Berlin and New York: Springer.
12. Howell, L. (2009). Web 3.0 has long since passed Web 2.0 in education for 2020. Retrieved 06-09-2009, from http://tagcblog.edublogs.org
13. Lajoie, S. (Ed.). (2000). Computers as cognitive tools: No more walls, II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Larissa, O., & Hendler, J. (2007). Embracing "Web 3.0". IEEE Internet Computing (May-June), 90-93.
15. Liu, Y. C., Chiang, M. C., Chen, S. C., & Huang, T. H. (2007). An online system using dynamic assessment and adaptive material. Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, 2007, Milwaukee, WI.
16. Markman, A. B. (1998). Knowledge representation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Mislevy, R. J., Behrens, J. T., Bennett, R. E., Demark, S. F., Frezzo, D. C., Levy, R., et al. (2007). On the roles of external knowledge representations in assessment design. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST). Graduate School of Education and Information Studies. University of California, Los Angeles.
18. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
19. Overman, S. (Ed.). (1988). Methodology and epistemology for social science. Selected papers from Donald T. Campbell. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Prinz, W. (1983). Wahrnehmung und Tatigkeitssteuerung. Heidelberg: Springer. [Perception and action regulation]
22. Rumelhart, D. E., & Norman, D. A. (1978). Accretion, tuning, and restructuring: Three models of learning. In J. U. Cotton & R. L. Klatzky (Eds.), Semantic facts in cognition (pp. 37-54). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Rumelhart, D. E., Smolensky, P., McClelland, J. L., & Hinton, G. E. (1986). Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart, & The PDP research group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 7-57). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Sarbadhikari, S. N. (2004). Automated diagnostic systems. Indian Journal of Medical Informatics, 1(1), 25-28.
25. Searle, J. R. (1992). The rediscovery of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. Seel, N. M. (1991). Mentale modelle undweltwissen. Gottingen: Hogrefe.
27. Seel, N. M. (1995). Mental models, knowledge transfer, and teaching strategies. Journal of Structural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 12(3), 197-213.
28. Seel, N. M. (1999). Educational semiotics: School learning reconsidered. Journal ofStructural Learning and Intelligent Systems, 14(1), 11-28.
29. Seel, N. M. (2008). Empirical perspectives on memory and motivation. In J. M. Spector, M. P. Driscoll, M. D. Merrill & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 39-54). Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum.
30. Seel, N. M., & Ifenthaler, D. (2009). Online lernen undlehren. Miinchen: Rheinhardt Verlag.
31. Seel, N. M., Ifenthaler, D., & Pirnay-Dummer, P. (2009). Mental models and problem solving: Technological solutions for measurement and assessment of the development of expertise. In P. Blumschein, W. Hung, D. H. Jonassen, & J. Strobel (Eds.), Model-based approaches to learning: Using systems models and simulations to improve understanding and problem solving in complex domains (pp. 17-40). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
32. Seel, N. M., & Winn, W. D. (1997). Research on media and learning: Distributed cognition and semiotics. In R. D. Tennyson, F. Schott, S. Dijkstra, & N. M. Seel (Eds.), Instructional design international perspectives. Volume 1: Theories and models ofinstructional design (pp. 293-326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
34. van der Linden, W. J. (1991). Applications of decision theory to test-based decision making. In R. K. Hambleton, & J. N. Zaal (Eds.), Advances in educational and psychological testing (pp. 129-156). Boston, MA: Kluwer.