An online system using dynamic assessment and adaptive material

Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages

  Liu, Yuan Chen ^a   Chiang, Ming Chung ^b   Chen, Sue Chun ^a   Istanda, Vaci ^c   Huang, Tzu Hua ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIPEI UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION   (Taiwan)

^b Yu Ying Elementary School   (Taiwan)

^c Executive Yuan   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; DIAGNOSTIC PRODUCTS; EDUCATION; EXPERIMENTS; HEALTH; PROCESS ENGINEERING; TEACHING;

APPLICATION DOMAINS; CONTROL GROUP; DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS; DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT; EXPERIMENT DATA; GENERAL EDUCATION; PRIMARY SCHOOLS; SPECIAL EDUCATION; TEACHING MATERIALS;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

EID: 50049085863     PISSN: 15394565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/FIE.2007.4417982     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Chang, C. C. (2001). A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 435-458.
2. Magoulas G. D., Papanikolaou V. & Grigoriadou M. (2003). Adaptive web-based learning: accommodating individual differences through system's adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 511-527.
3. Georgiadou E., Triantafillou E. & Economides, A. A. (2006). Evaluation parameters for computer-adaptive testing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 261-278.
4. Huang, Guang-xiong (1996). Teaching Principles. Taipei: Shida Bookstore.
5. Zhou, Tian-si (1998). Dynamic Assessment: Development and Improvement on Children's Potential Media-style Learning. Taipei: Psychology Publisher.
6. Wang, Wen-ke (1999). Courses and Teaching Theory. Taipei: Wu-Nan Bookstore.
7. Treagust, D. F.; Haslam, F. (1987). Diagnosing secondary students' misconceptions of photosynthesis and respiration in plants using a two-tier multiple choice instrument. Journal of Biological Education, 21, 203-211.
8. Arthur L. Odom. & Lloyd H. Barrow.(1995). Development and Application of s Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Measuring College Biology Student's Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis after a Course of Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32, 1, pp.45-61.
9. C. C. Tsai & C. Chou.(2002).Diagnosing students' alternative conceptions in science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (200) 18, 157-165.
10. Feuerstein, R. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retailed performers: The learning potential assessment device theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore: University Park.
11. Haywood, H. C., Brown, A. L., & Wingenfeld, S. A. (1990). Dynamic approaches to psychoeducational assessment. School Psychology Review, 19 (4), 411-422.
12. Lidz, C. S. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 141-170). New York: The Guilford Press.
13. Jitendra A. K., & Kameenui, E. j. (1993). Dynamic assessment as a compensatory assessment approach: A description and analysys. Remedical and Special Education, 14 (5), 6-18.
14. Odom, A. L., & Barrow L. H. (1995). Development and Application of a Two-Tier Diagnostic Test Measuring College Biology Students' Understanding of Diffusion and Osmosis after a Course of Instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61.
15. Rollnick, M. & Mahooana, P. P. (1999). A quick and effective way of diagnosing student difficulties: two tier from simple multiple choice questions. South African Journal of Chemistry, 52(4), p 161.