Comparing the intersex genetic correlation for fitness across novel environments in the fruit fly, Drosophila serrata

Heredity

Volumn 112, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 143-148

  Punzalan, D ^a,b   Delcourt, M ^a,c   Rundle, H D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

environmental dependence; genetic covariance; intralocus sexual conflict; sexually antagonistic

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; CORRELATION; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; FITNESS; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; HABITAT TYPE; INTERSEXUAL INTERACTION; SEXUAL CONFLICT;

DROSOPHILA SERRATA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CROSS BREEDING; DROSOPHILA; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; INBREEDING; MALE; PHENOTYPE; POPULATION GENETICS; REPRODUCTIVE FITNESS;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; DROSOPHILA; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; GENE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GENETIC FITNESS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; MALE; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 84892797211     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2013.85     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bedhomme S, Chippindale AK (2007). Irreconcilable differences: when sexual dimorphism fails to resolve sexual conflict. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Oxford University Press pp 185-194.
2. Bonduriansky R, Chenoweth SF (2009). Intralocus sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 280-288.
3. Chapman T, Arnqvist G, Bangham J, Rowe L (2003). Sexual conflict. Trends Ecol Evol 18: 41-47.
4. Charmantier A, Garant D (2005). Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proc R Soc Lond B 272: 1415-1425.
5. Chenoweth SF, Rundle HD, Blows MW (2008). Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am Nat 171: 22-34.
6. Chippindale AK, Gibson JR, Rice WR (2001). Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 1671-1675.
7. Cox RM, Calsbeek R (2009). Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am Nat 173: 176-187.
8. Delcourt M, Blows MW, Rundle HD (2009). Sexually antagonistic genetic variance for fitness in an ancestral and a novel environment. Proc R Soc Lond B 276: 2009-2014.
9. Falconer DS, MacKay TFC (1996). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman: Essex.
10. Fedorka KM, Mousseau TA (2004). Female mating bias results in conflicting sex-specific offspring fitness. Nature 429: 65-67.
11. Foerster K, Coulson T, Sheldon BC, Pemberton JM, Clutton-Brock TH, Kruuk LEB (2007). Sexually antagonistic genetic variation for fitness in red deer. Nature 447: 1107-1111.
12. Fowler K, Whitlock MC (2002). Environmental stress, inbreeding and the nature of phenotypic and genetic variance in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B 269: 677-683.
13. Frentiu F, Chenoweth SF (2008). Polyandry and paternity skew in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila serrata. Mol Ecol 17: 1589-1596.
14. Hadfield J (2010). MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: the MCMCglmm R package. J Stat Softw 33: 1-22.
15. Hine E, Blows MW (2006). Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix. Genetics 173: 1135-1144.
16. Hoffmann AA, Merilä J (1999). Heritable variation and evolution under favourable and unfavourable conditions. Trends Ecol Evol 14: 96-101.
17. Houle D, Pelabon C, Wagner GP, Hansen TF (2011). Measurement and meaning in biology. Q Rev Biol 86: 1-32.
18. Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD, Smith MJ, Bentsen CL, Bussiere LF (2004). High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432: 1024-1027.
19. Judge KA, Ting JJ, Gwynne DT (2008). Condition dependence of male life span and calling effort in a field cricket. Evolution 62: 868-878.
20. Kirkpatrick M, Meyer K (2004). Direct estimation of genetic principal components: simplified analysis of complex phenotypes. Genetics 168: 2295-2306.
21. Kruuk L (2004). Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model'. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 359: 873-890.
22. Lande R (1980). Sexual dimorphism, sexual selection, and adaptation in polygenic characters. Evolution 34: 292-305.
23. Long TAF, Agrawal AF, Rowe L (2012). The effect of sexual selection on offspring fitness depends on the nature of genetic variation. Curr Biol 22: 204-208.
24. Maklakov AA, Simpson SJ, Zajitschek F, Hall M, Dessman J, Clissold F et al. (2008). Sexspecific fitness effects of nutrient intake on reproduction and lifespan. Curr Biol 18: 1062-1066.
25. Meyer K, Kirkpatrick M (2008). Perils of parsimony: properties of reduced rank estimates of genetic covariances. Genetics 180: 1153-1166.
26. Meyer K (2009). Factor-analytic models for genotype X environment type problems and structured covariance matrices. Genet Sel Evol 49: 21-33.
27. Pischedda A, Chippindale AK (2006). Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biology 4: e356.
28. Poissant J, Wilson AJ, Coltman DW (2009). Sex-specific genetic variance and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: a systematic review of cross-sex genetic correlations. Evolution 64: 97-107.
29. Punzalan D, Cooray M, Rodd FH, Rowe L (2008). Condition dependence of sexually dimorphic coloration and longevity in the ambush bug Phymata Americana. J Evol Biol 21: 1297-1306.
30. Qvarnström A, Brommer JE, Gustafsson L (2006). Testing the genetics underlying the coevolution of mate choice and ornament in the wild. Nature 441: 84-86.
31. Rice WR (1984). Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38: 735-742.
32. Rice WR, Chippindale AK (2001). Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J Evol Biol 14: 685-693.
33. Rundle HD, Chenoweth SF, Doughty P, Blows MW (2005). Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLoS Biology 3: e368.
34. Rundle HD, Chenoweth SF, Blows MW (2006). The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment. Evolution 60: 2218-2225.
35. Sgrò CM, Hoffmann AA (1998). Effects of stress combinations on the expression of additive genetic variation for fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res Camb 72: 13-18.
36. Sgrò CM, Hoffmann AA (2004). Genetic correlations, tradeoffs and environmental variation. Heredity 93: 241-248.
37. Whitlock MC, Phillips PC, Moore FBG, Tonsor SJ (1995). Multiple fitness peaks and epistasis. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 26: 601-629.