Does concept-mapping strategy work for everyone? the levels of generativity and learners' self-regulated learning skills

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 606-618

  Lim, Kyu Yon ^a,b   Lee, Hyeon Woo ^b   Grabowski, Barbara ^b  

^a Department of Pennsylvania State University ^*  (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MAPPING;

CONCEPT MAPPING; CONCEPT MAPPING STRATEGIES; CONCEPT MAPS; GENERATIVITY; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; TREATMENT LEVEL; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 67249119500     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00872.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Azevedo, R. Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 3, 523 535. (Pubitemid 39216570)
2. Boekaerts, M. Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 2, 199 231.
3. Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Campione, J. C. Ferrara, R. A. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In J. Flavell E. Markman (Eds Handbook of child psychology: cognitive development (pp. 77 166). New York : Wiley.
4. Chang, K.-E., Sung, Y.-T. Chen, I.-D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. Journal of Experimental Education, 71, 2, 5 23.
5. Chularut, P. DeBacker, T. K. (2003). The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 248 263. (Pubitemid 38939259)
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Corno, L. Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18, 2, 88 108.
8. Dwyer, F. M. (1978). Strategies for improving visual learning. University Park, PA : Learning Services.
9. Gobert, J. D. Clement, J. J. (1999). Effects of student generated diagrams versus student-generated summaries on conceptual understanding of casual and dynamic knowledge in plate tectonics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1, 39 53. (Pubitemid 129534707)
10. Grabowski, B. L. (2003). Generative learning contributions to the design of instruction and learning. In D. H. Jonassen Association for Educational Communications and Technology (Eds Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed., pp. 719 743). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Hall, R. H., Dansereau, D. F. Skaggs, L. P. (1992). Knowledge maps and the presentation of related information domains. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 5 18.
12. Heinz-Fry, J. A. Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education, 74, 461 472.
13. Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. L. Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77, 1, 95 111.
14. Jo, I. (2001). The effects of concept mapping on college students' comprehension of expository text (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University).
15. Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D. Peers, K. (1997). Concept mapping as cognitive learning and assessment tools. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8, 3/4, 289 308.
16. Kenny, R. (1995). The generative effects of instructional organizers with computer-based interactive video. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12, 3, 275 296.
17. Lambiotte, J. G. Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Effects of knowledge maps and prior knowledge on recall of science lecture content. Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 189 201.
18. Lee, Y. Nelson, D. W. (2005). Viewing or visualising - which concept map strategy works best on problem-solving performance? British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 2, 193 203. (Pubitemid 43906593)
19. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Novak, J. D. Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York : Cambridge University Press.
21. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 4, 385 407. (Pubitemid 40976017)
22. Pintrich, P. R. De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of a classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 1, 33 40.
23. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T. McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI : National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
24. Romance, N. R. Vitale, M. R. (1998). Concept mapping as a tool for learning. College Teaching, 47, 2, 74 79.
25. Rozak, T. (1986). The cult of information: the folklore of computers and the true art of thinking. New York : Pantheon.
26. Scevak, J. J., Moore, P. J. Kirby, J. R. (1993). Training students to use maps to increase text recall. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18, 401 13.
27. Smith, K. Dwyer, F. M. (1995). The effect of concept mapping strategies in facilitating student achievement. International Journal of Instructional Media, 22, 1, 25 31.
28. Taricani, E. (2002). Effects of the level of generativity in concept mapping with knowledge of correct response feedback on learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University).
29. Van Merrienboer, J. J. G. (1990). Strategies for programming instruction in high school: program completion vs. program generation. Journal of Computing Research, 6, 265 287.
30. Wang, C. X. (2003). The instructional effects of prior knowledge and three concept mapping strategies in facilitating achievement of different educational objectives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University).
31. Winne, P. H. Hadwin, A. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky A. Graesser (Eds Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277 304). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 2, 87 95.
33. Wittrock, M. C. (1990). Generative process of comprehension. Educational Psychologist, 24, 4, 345 376.
34. Wittrock, M. C. (1991). Generative teaching of comprehension. Elementary School Journal, 92, 167 182.
35. Wittrock, M. C. (1992). Generative learning processes of the brain. Educational Psychologist, 27, 4, 531 541.
36. Zimmerman, B. Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614 628.