How to encourage smokers to participate in web-based computer-tailored smoking cessation programs: A comparison of different recruitment strategies

Health Education Research

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 23-40

  Stanczyk, N E ^a   Bolman, C ^b   Smit, E S ^a   Candel, M J J M ^a   Muris, J W M ^a   De Vries, H ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SELECTION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTITIONERS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTIVATION; NEWSPAPERS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PATIENT SELECTION; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 84892761402     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyt104     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Te Poel F, Bolman C, Reubsaet A et al. Efficacy of a single computer-tailored e-mail for smoking cessation: results after 6 months. Health Educ Res 2009; 24: 930-40.
2. Dijkstra A, De Vries H, Roijackers J. Long-term effectiveness of computer-generated tailored feedback in smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 1998; 13: 207-14.
3. Smit ES, de Vries H, Hoving C. Effectiveness of a Webbased multiple tailored smoking cessation program: a randomized controlled trial among Dutch adult smokers. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e82.
4. Civljak M, Sheikh A, Stead LF et al. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010: CD007078.
5. Elfeddali I, Bolman C, CandelMJ et al. Preventing smoking relapse via Web-based computer-tailored feedback: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012; 14: e109.
6. McDonaldPW. Population-based recruitment for quit-smoking programs: an analytic review of communication variables. Prev Med 1999; 28: 545-57.
7. LopezAD, CollishawNE, Piha T. Adescriptive model of the cigarette epidemic in developed countries. Tob Control 1994; 3: 242-7.
8. Jha P, Peto R, Zatonski W et al. Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America. Lancet 2006; 368: 367-70.
9. Cavelaars AE, Kunst AE, Geurts JJ et al. Educational differences in smoking: international comparison. BMJ 2000; 320: 1102-7.
10. Hoving C, Mudde AN, Dijk F et al. Effectiveness of a computer-generated tailored smoking cessation expert system in Dutch community pharmacy and general practice setting. Health Educ 2010; 110: 17-29.
11. Shahab L, McEwen A. Online support for smoking cessation: a systematic review of the literature. Addiction 2009; 104: 1792-804.
12. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214-21.
13. Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A et al. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a metaanalysis. Addiction 2010; 105: 1381-90.
14. Myung SK, McDonnell DD, Kazinets G et al. Effects of Web-and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 929-37.
15. Richardson A, Graham AL, Cobb N et al. Engagement promotes abstinence in a web-based cessation intervention: cohort study. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e14.
16. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J et al. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res 2006; 8: e10.
17. Balmford J, Borland R, Benda P. Patterns of use of an automated interactive personalized coaching program for smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10: e54.
18. Evers KE, Cummins CO, Prochaska JO et al. Online health behavior and disease management programs: Are we ready for them? Are they ready for us? JMed Internet Res 2005; 7: e27.
19. Brouwer W, Oenema A, Raat H et al. Characteristics of visitors and revisitors to an Internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention implemented for use by the general public. Health Educ Res 2010; 25: 585-95.
20. BrouwerW, KroezeW, Crutzen R et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e2.
21. Crutzen R. Hard to get, hard to keep: dissemination of and exposure to Internet-delivered Health behaviour change interventions aimed at adolescents. Doctoral Thesis. Etenaken. The Netherlands: Datawyse, 2009.
22. LorenceD, Park H.Group disparities and health information: a study of online access for the underserved. Health Inform J 2008; 14: 29-38.
23. Van 't Riet J, Crutzen R,DeVriesH. Investigating predictors of visiting, using, and revisiting an online health-communication program: a longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e37.
24. Peters L, Pos S, Bouwens J. Bevorderen van stoppen met roken bij achterstandsgroepen en allochtonen op lokaal niveau. Woerden, Den Haag, The Netherlands: Nationaal Instituut voor Gezondheidsbevordering en Ziektepreventie (NIGZ), 2005.
25. Nagelhout GE, de Korte-de Boer D, Kunst AE et al. Trends in socioeconomic inequalities in smoking prevalence, consumption, initiation, and cessation between 2001 and 2008 in the Netherlands. Findings from a national population survey. BMC Public Health 2012; 12: 303.
26. Kotz D, West R. Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it's not in the trying, but in the succeeding. Tob Control 2009; 18: 43-6.
27. Fidler JA, Jarvis MJ, Mindell J et al. Nicotine intake in cigarette smokers in England: distribution and demographic correlates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomakers Prev 2008; 17: 3331-6.
28. Stanczyk NE, Crutzen R, Bolman C et al. Influence of delivery strategy on message-processing mechanisms and future adherence to a dutch computer-tailored smoking cessation intervention. J Med Internet Res 2013; 15: e28.
29. Balmford J, Borland R, Benda P et al. Factors associated with use of automated smoking cessation interventions: findings from the eQuit study. Health Educ Res 2013; 28: 288-99.
30. Czarnecki KD, Vichinsky LE, Ellis JA et al. Media campaign effectiveness in promoting a smoking-cessation program. Am J Prev Med 2010; 38(Suppl. 3): S333-42.
31. Swartz LH, Noell JW, Schroeder SW et al. A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tob Control 2006; 15: 7-12.
32. Graham AL, Milner P, Saul JE et al. Online advertising as a public health and recruitment tool: comparison of different media campaigns to increase demand for smoking cessation interventions. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10: e50.
33. Smit ES, Hoving C, Cox VC et al. Influence of recruitment strategy on the reach and effect of a web-based multiple tailored smoking cessation intervention among Dutch adult smokers. Health Educ Res 2012; 27: 191-9.
34. Hoving C, Mudde AN, de Vries H. Effect of recruitment method and setting on the composition of samples consisting of adult smokers. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 79-86.
35. Stanczyk NE, Bolman C, Muris JWet al. Study protocol of a Dutch smoking cessation e-health program. BMC Public Health 2011; 11: 847.
36. Association AP. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Am Psychologist 2002; 57: 1060-73.
37. Steunbijstoppen.nl. Online stoppen met roken interventie2012, Available at: http://www.steunbijstoppen.nl. (Archived by WebCiteat http://www. webcitation.org/ 6BbakEW1j. Accessed: 22 October 2012).
38. Chavannes NH, Kaper J, Frijling BD et al. NHG-Standaard Stoppen met roken. Huisarts Wet 2007; 50: 306-14.
39. de Vries H, Mudde A, Leijs I et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (EFSA): an example of integral prevention. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 611-26.
40. de Vries H, Eggers SM, Bolman C. The role of action planning and plan enactment for smoking cessation. BMC Public Health 2013; 13: 393.
41. Smit ES, de Vries H, Hoving C. The PAS study: a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of a webbased multiple tailored smoking cessation programme and tailored counselling by practice nurses. Contemp Clin Trials 2010; 31: 251-8.
42. CBS. Centraal bureau voor de statistiek2012, Available at: http://www.cbs.nl. (Archived by WebCiteat http://www. webcitation.org/67D55bpsp. Accessed: 26 April 2012).
43. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC et al. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991; 86: 1119-27.
44. de Vries H, Kremers SP, Smeets T et al. The effectiveness of tailored feedback and action plans in an intervention addressing multiple health behaviors. Am J Health promot 2008; 22: 417-25.
45. Mudde AN, Willemsen MC, Kremers S et al. Meetinstrumenten voor onderzoek naar roken en stoppen met roken. (Measurements from Studies About Smoking and Smoking Cessation). Den Haag,The Netherlands: Stivoro, 2006.
46. Marshall SW. Power for tests of interaction: effect of raising the Type I error rate. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 2007; 4: 4.
47. Belisario JSM, BruggelingMN,Gunn LHet al. Interventions for recruiting smokers into cessation programmes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012.
48. Webb TL, Joseph J, Yardley L et al. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e4.
49. Abrams DB, Orleans CT, Niaura RS et al. Integrating individual and public health perspectives for treatment of tobacco dependence under managed health care: a combined stepped-care andmatchingmodel. Ann BehavMed 1996; 18: 290-304.
50. Schaap MW, Kunst AE. Monitoring of socio-economic inequalities in smoking: learning from the experiences of recent scientific studies. Public Health 2009; 123: 103-9.
51. Hiscock R, Judge K, Bauld L. Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation? J Public Health 2011; 33: 39-47.
52. Velicer WF, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS et al. Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies. Psychol Bull 1992; 111: 23-41.