Is natural SUSY natural?

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2013, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Hardy, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Supersymmetry phenomenology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892753914     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/Jhep10(2013)133     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. S. Dimopoulos and G. Giudice, Naturalness constraints in supersymmetric theories with nonuniversal soft terms, Phys. Lett. B 357 (1995) 573 [hep-ph/9507282] [INSPIRE].
2. A.G. Cohen, D. Kaplan and A. Nelson, The more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 588 [hep-ph/9607394] [INSPIRE].
3. G.D. Kribs, A. Martin and A. Menon, Natural Supersymmetry and Implications for Higgs physics, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 035025 [arXiv:1305.1313] [INSPIRE].
4. K. Krizka, A. Kumar and D.E. Morrissey, Very Light Scalar Top Quarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 095016 [arXiv:1212.4856] [INSPIRE].
5. R. Auzzi, A. Giveon, S.B. Gudnason and T. Shacham, A Light Stop with Flavor in Natural SUSY, Jhep 01 (2013) 169 [arXiv:1208.6263] [INSPIRE].
6. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, V. Sanz and M. Trott, NSUSY fits, Jhep 12 (2012) 077 [arXiv:1207.7355] [INSPIRE].
7. Z. Han, A. Katz, D. Krohn and M. Reece, (Light) Stop Signs, Jhep 08 (2012) 083 [arXiv:1205.5808] [INSPIRE].
8. H.M. Lee, V. Sanz and M. Trott, Hitting sbottom in natural SUSY, Jhep 05 (2012) 139 [arXiv:1204.0802] [INSPIRE].
9. Y. Bai, H.-C. Cheng, J. Gallicchio and J. Gu, Stop the Top Background of the Stop Search, Jhep 07 (2012) 110 [arXiv:1203.4813] [INSPIRE].
10. B. Allanach and B. Gripaios, Hide and Seek With Natural Supersymmetry at the LHC, Jhep 05 (2012) 062 [arXiv:1202.6616] [INSPIRE].
11. G. Larsen, Y. Nomura and H.L. Roberts, Supersymmetry with Light Stops, Jhep 06 (2012) 032 [arXiv:1202.6339] [INSPIRE].
12. X.-J. Bi, Q.-S. Yan and P.-F. Yin, Probing Light Stop Pairs at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035005 [arXiv:1111.2250] [INSPIRE].
13. C. Brust, A. Katz, S. Lawrence and R. Sundrum, SUSY, the Third Generation and the LHC, Jhep 03 (2012) 103 [arXiv:1110.6670] [INSPIRE].
14. E. Arganda, J.L. Diaz-Cruz and A. Szynkman, Decays of H0=A0 in supersymmetric scenarios with heavy sfermions, Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013) 2384 [arXiv:1211.0163] [INSPIRE].
15. E. Arganda, J.L. Diaz-Cruz and A. Szynkman, Slim SUSY, Phys. Lett. B 722 (2013) 100 [arXiv:1301.0708] [INSPIRE].
16. J. Cao, C. Han, L. Wu, J.M. Yang and Y. Zhang, Probing Natural SUSY from Stop Pair Production at the LHC, Jhep 11 (2012) 039 [arXiv:1206.3865] [INSPIRE].
17. N. Arkani-Hamed and H. Murayama, Can the supersymmetric avor problem decouple?, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 6733 [hep-ph/9703259] [INSPIRE].
18. J. Hisano, K. Kurosawa and Y. Nomura, Natural effective supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 584 (2000) 3 [hep-ph/0002286] [INSPIRE].
19. R. Barbieri and G. Giudice, Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63 [INSPIRE].
20. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, Supersymmetry, naturalness and signatures at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 095004 [hep-ph/0602096] [INSPIRE].
21. R. Kitano and Y. Nomura, A solution to the supersymmetric fine-tuning problem within the MSSM, Phys. Lett. B 631 (2005) 58 [hep-ph/0509039] [INSPIRE].
22. S. Antusch, L. Calibbi, V. Maurer, M. Monaco and M. Spinrath, Naturalness of the Non-Universal MSSM in the Light of the Recent Higgs Results, Jhep 01 (2013) 187 [arXiv:1207.7236] [INSPIRE].
23. J.L. Feng, Naturalness and the Status of Supersymmetry, arXiv:1302.6587 [INSPIRE].
24. A. Arvanitaki, N. Craig, S. Dimopoulos and G. Villadoro, Mini-Split, Jhep 02 (2013) 126 [arXiv:1210.0555] [INSPIRE].
25. A. Strumia, Naturalness of supersymmetric models, hep-ph/9904247 [INSPIRE].
26. G.L. Kane and S. King, Naturalness implications of LEP results, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 113 [hep-ph/9810374] [INSPIRE].
27. Z. Kang, J. Li and T. Li, On Naturalness of the MSSM and NMSSM, Jhep 11 (2012) 024 [arXiv:1201.5305] [INSPIRE].
28. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, Testing SUSY at the LHC: Electroweak and Dark matter fine tuning at two-loop order, Nucl. Phys. B 835 (2010) 110 [arXiv:1001.3884] [INSPIRE].
29. S. Cassel, D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, Testing SUSY, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 214 [arXiv:0911.1134] [INSPIRE].
30. D. Ghilencea, A new approach to Naturalness in SUSY models, PoS Corfu2012 (2013) 034 [arXiv:1304.1193] [INSPIRE].
31. P. Athron, M. Binjonaid and S.F. King, Fine Tuning in the Constrained Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 115023 [arXiv:1302.5291] [INSPIRE].
32. M. Cabrera, J. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, Bayesian approach and Naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC, Jhep 03 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0812.0536] [INSPIRE].
33. J. Casas, J. Espinosa and I. Hidalgo, The MSSM fine tuning problem: A way out, Jhep 01 (2004) 008 [hep-ph/0310137] [INSPIRE].
34. B. de Carlos and J. Casas, One loop analysis of the electroweak breaking in supersymmetric models and the fine tuning problem, Phys. Lett. B 309 (1993) 320 [hep-ph/9303291] [INSPIRE].
35. M. Badziak, E. Dudas, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Inverted Sfermion Mass Hierarchy and the Higgs Boson Mass in the MSSM, Jhep 07 (2012) 155 [arXiv:1205.1675] [INSPIRE].
36. G.G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The Fine-Tuning of the Generalised NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 710 [arXiv:1108.1284] [INSPIRE].
37. H. Baer, V. Barger, P. Huang, A. Mustafayev and X. Tata, Radiative natural SUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 161802 [arXiv:1207.3343] [INSPIRE].
38. M. Papucci, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Natural SUSY Endures, Jhep 09 (2012) 035 [arXiv:1110.6926] [INSPIRE].
39. K. Agashe and M. Graesser, Supersymmetry breaking and the supersymmetric avor problem: An analysis of decoupling the first two generation scalars, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 015007 [hep-ph/9801446] [INSPIRE].
40. C. Wymant, Optimising Stop Naturalness, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 115023 [arXiv:1208.1737] [INSPIRE].
41. D. Ghilencea and G. Ross, The fine-tuning cost of the likelihood in SUSY models, Nucl. Phys. B 868 (2013) 65 [arXiv:1208.0837] [INSPIRE].
42. H. Baer et al., Post-LHC7 fine-tuning in the mSUGRA/CMSSM model with a 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035017 [arXiv:1210.3019] [INSPIRE].
43. H. Baer, V. Barger and M. Padeffke-Kirkland, Electroweak versus high scale finetuning in the 19-parameter SUGRA model, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 055026 [arXiv:1304.6732] [INSPIRE].
44. M. Dine et al., Visible effects of the hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 045023 [hep-ph/0405159] [INSPIRE].
45. A.G. Cohen, T.S. Roy and M. Schmaltz, Hidden sector renormalization of MSSM scalar masses, Jhep 02 (2007) 027 [hep-ph/0612100] [INSPIRE].
46. R. Contino and I. Scimemi, The supersymmetric avor problem for heavy first two generation scalars at next-to-leading order, Eur. Phys. J. C 10 (1999) 347 [hep-ph/9809437] [INSPIRE].
47. G.D. Kribs, E. Poppitz and N. Weiner, Flavor in supersymmetry with an extended R-symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 055010 [arXiv:0712.2039] [INSPIRE].
48. M. Abdullah, I. Galon, Y. Shadmi and Y. Shirman, Flavored Gauge Mediation, A Heavy Higgs and Supersymmetric Alignment, Jhep 06 (2013) 057 [arXiv:1209.4904] [INSPIRE].
49. M.J. Perez, P. Ramond and J. Zhang, Mixing supersymmetry and family symmetry breakings, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 035021 [arXiv:1209.6071] [INSPIRE].
50. R. Mahbubani, M. Papucci, G. Perez, J.T. Ruderman and A. Weiler, Light non-degenerate squarks at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 151804 [arXiv:1212.3328] [INSPIRE].
51. I. Galon, G. Perez and Y. Shadmi, Non-Degenerate Squarks from Flavored Gauge Mediation, Jhep 09 (2013) 117 [arXiv:1306.6631] [INSPIRE].
52. G. Dvali and A. Pomarol, Anomalous U(1) as a mediator of supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 3728 [hep-ph/9607383] [INSPIRE].
53. A.E. Nelson and D. Wright, Horizontal, anomalous U(1) symmetry for the more minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 1598 [hep-ph/9702359] [INSPIRE].
54. D.E. Kaplan, F. Lepeintre, A. Masiero, A.E. Nelson and A. Riotto, Fermion masses and gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking from a single U(1), Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 055003 [hep-ph/9806430] [INSPIRE].
55. D.E. Kaplan and G.D. Kribs, Phenomenology of avor mediated supersymmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075011 [hep-ph/9906341] [INSPIRE].
56. N. Craig, M. McCullough and J. Thaler, Flavor Mediation Delivers Natural SUSY, Jhep 06 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1203.1622] [INSPIRE].
57. E. Hardy and J. March-Russell, Retrofftted Natural Supersymmetry from a U(1), Jhep 05 (2013) 120 [arXiv:1302.5423] [INSPIRE].
58. A. Brignole, L.E. Ibáñez and C. Muñoz, Soft supersymmetry breaking terms from supergravity and superstring models, hep-ph/9707209 [INSPIRE].
59. P. Meade, N. Seiberg and D. Shih, General Gauge Mediation, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 177 (2009) 143 [arXiv:0801.3278] [INSPIRE].
60. J.L. Feng, K.T. Matchev and T. Moroi, Focus points and naturalness in supersymmetry, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075005 [hep-ph/9909334] [INSPIRE].
61. D. Horton and G. Ross, Naturalness and Focus Points with Non-Universal Gaugino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 221 [arXiv:0908.0857] [INSPIRE].
62. S.P. Martin, A supersymmetry primer, hep-ph/9709356 [INSPIRE].
63. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 496 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0910.1785] [INSPIRE].
64. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura and V.S. Rychkov, Supersymmetry without a Light Higgs Boson, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 035007 [hep-ph/0607332] [INSPIRE].
65. E. Hardy, J. March-Russell and J. Unwin, Precision Unification in λSUSY with a 125 GeV Higgs, Jhep 10 (2012) 072 [arXiv:1207.1435] [INSPIRE].
66. B. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145] [INSPIRE].
67. A. Riotto and E. Roulet, Vacuum decay along supersymmetric at directions, Phys. Lett. B 377 (1996) 60 [hep-ph/9512401] [INSPIRE].
68. A. Riotto, E. Roulet and I. Vilja, Preheating and vacuum metastability in supersymmetry, Phys. Lett. B 390 (1997) 73 [hep-ph/9607403] [INSPIRE].
69. A. Kusenko, P. Langacker and G. Segre, Phase transitions and vacuum tunneling into charge and color breaking minima in the MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5824 [hep-ph/9602414] [INSPIRE].
70. P.J. Fox, A.E. Nelson and N. Weiner, Dirac gaugino masses and supersoft supersymmetry breaking, Jhep 08 (2002) 035 [hep-ph/0206096] [INSPIRE].
71. T. Kikuchi, A solution to the little hierarchy problem in a partly N = 2 extension of the MSSM, arXiv:0812.2569 [INSPIRE].
72. L.M. Carpenter, Dirac Gauginos, Negative Supertraces and Gauge Mediation, Jhep 09 (2012) 102 [arXiv:1007.0017] [INSPIRE].
73. R. Davies, J. March-Russell and M. McCullough, A Supersymmetric One Higgs Doublet Model, Jhep 04 (2011) 108 [arXiv:1103.1647] [INSPIRE].
74. K. Benakli, Dirac Gauginos: A User Manual, Fortsch. Phys. 59 (2011) 1079 [arXiv:1106.1649] [INSPIRE].
75. G.D. Kribs and A. Martin, Supersoft Supersymmetry is Super-Safe, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 115014 [arXiv:1203.4821] [INSPIRE].
76. K. Benakli, M.D. Goodsell and F. Staub, Dirac Gauginos and the 125 GeV Higgs, Jhep 06 (2013) 073 [arXiv:1211.0552] [INSPIRE].
77. R. Davies, Dirac gauginos and unification in F-theory, Jhep 10 (2012) 010 [arXiv:1205.1942] [INSPIRE].
78. S. Abel and M. Goodsell, Easy Dirac Gauginos, Jhep 06 (2011) 064 [arXiv:1102.0014] [INSPIRE].
79. D.M. Pierce, J.A. Bagger, K.T. Matchev and R.-j. Zhang, Precision corrections in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 491 (1997) 3 [hep-ph/9606211] [INSPIRE].