A new approach to naturalness in SUSY models

Proceedings of Science

Volumn 8-27-September-2012, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Ghilencea, D M ^a,b  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b HORIA HULUBEI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS AND NUCLEAR ENGINEERING   (Romania)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS);

MEASURED VALUES; MODEL INDEPENDENT; NEW APPROACHES; NUMBER OF DEGREES OF FREEDOM; QUANTUM CORRECTION; SUPERSYMMETRIC EXTENSIONS; SUPERSYMMETRIC MODELS; THE STANDARD MODEL;

SUPERSYMMETRY;

EID: 84990960891     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18248039     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (66)

1. D. M. Ghilencea, Fixing the EW scale in supersymmetric models after the Higgs discovery, arXiv:1302.5262 [hep-ph], submitted to Nuclear Physics
2. B. D. M. Ghilencea and G. G. Ross, The fine-tuning cost of the likelihood in SUSY models, Nucl. Phys. B 868 (2013) 65 [arXiv:1208.0837 [hep-ph]].
3. D. M. Ghilencea, H. M. Lee and M. Park, Tuning supersymmetric models at the LHC: A comparative analysis at two-loop level, JHEP 1207 (2012) 046 [arXiv:1203.0569 [hep-ph]].
4. L. Susskind, Dynamics of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking in the Weinberg-Salam Theory, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2619 and K. Wilson, as acknowledged in this paper.
5. G. 't Hooft: in Recent Developments in Field Theories, ed. G. 't Hooft et al., Plenum Press, New York, 1980, page 135.
6. W. A. Bardeen, On naturalness in standard model, FERMILAB-CONF-95-391-T. For detailed models, see for example: M. Shaposhnikov and D. Zenhausern, Quantum scale invariance, cosmological constant and hierarchy problem, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 162 [arXiv:0809.3406 [hep-th]].
7. R. Armillis, A. Monin, M. Shaposhnikov and,, Spontaneously Broken Conformal Symmetry: Dealing with the Trace Anomaly, arXiv:1302.5619 [hep-th].
8. K. A. Meissner and H. Nicolai, Conformal Symmetry and the Standard Model, Phys. Lett. B 648 (2007) 312 [hep-th/0612165].
9. Effective action, conformal anomaly and the issue of quadratic divergences, Phys. Lett. B 660 (2008) 260 [arXiv:0710.2840 [hep-th]].
10. F. Bezrukov et al., Higgs Boson Mass and New Physics, JHEP 1210 (2012) 140 [arXiv:1205.2893 [hep-ph]] and references therein;
11. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze and R. R. Volkas, Electroweak Higgs as a pseudo-Goldstone boson of broken scale invariance, Phys. Lett. B 655 (2007) 156 [arXiv:0704.1165 [hep-ph]];
12. Stable mass hierarchies and dark matter from hidden sectors in the scale-invariant standard model, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 035005 [arXiv:1006.0131 [hep-ph]].
13. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze, K. L. McDonald and R. R. Volkas, A Solution to the hierarchy problem from an almost decoupled hidden sector within a classically scale invariant theory, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 035006 [arXiv:0709.2750 [hep-ph]];
14. J. R. Ellis et al., Observables in Low-Energy Superstring Models, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 1 (1986) 57
15. R. Barbieri and G. F. Giudice, Upper Bounds on Supersymmetric Particle Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 63.
16. G. W. Anderson and D. J. Castano, Measures of fine tuning, Phys. Lett. B 347 (1995) 300 [hep-ph/9409419].
17. See section 4.6 in: P. Bechtle, T. Bringmann, K. Desch, H. Dreiner, M. Hamer, C. Hensel, M. Kramer and N. Nguyen, Constrained Supersymmetry after two years of LHC data: a global view with Fittino, JHEP 1206 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1204.4199 [hep-ph]].
18. P. Ciafaloni and A. Strumia, Naturalness upper bounds on gauge mediated soft terms, Nucl. Phys. B 494 (1997) 41 [hep-ph/9611204].
19. A. Strumia, Naturalness of supersymmetric models, hep-ph/9904247.
20. M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu, C. Z. Yuan and Z. Zhang, Reevaluation of the hadronic contribution to the muon magnetic anomaly using new e+ e- → pi+ pi- cross section data from BABAR, Eur. Phys. J. C 66 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0908.4300 [hep-ph]].
21. B. C. Allanach, Naturalness priors and fits to the constrained minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Lett. B 635 (2006) 123 [hep-ph/0601089].
22. B. C. Allanach, K. Cranmer, C. G. Lester and A. M. Weber, Natural priors, CMSSM fits and LHC weather forecasts, JHEP 0708 (2007) 023 [arXiv:0705.0487 [hep-ph]].
23. M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas and R. Ruiz de Austri, Bayesian approach and Naturalness in MSSM analyses for the LHC, JHEP 0903 (2009) 075 [arXiv:0812.0536 [hep-ph]].
24. M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas and R. Ruiz d Austri, MSSM Forecast for the LHC, JHEP 1005 (2010) 043 [arXiv:0911.4686 [hep-ph]].
25. S. S. AbdusSalam, B. C. Allanach, F. Quevedo, F. Feroz and M. Hobson, Fitting the Phenomenological MSSM, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 095012 [arXiv:0904.2548 [hep-ph]].
26. S. Fichet, Quantified naturalness from Bayesian statistics, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 125029 [arXiv:1204.4940 [hep-ph]].
27. C. Balazs, A. Buckley, D. Carter, B. Farmer and M. White, Should we still believe in constrained supersymmetry?, arXiv:1205.1568 [hep-ph].
28. G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov and A. Semenov, MicrOMEGAs: A Program for calculating the relic density in the MSSM, Comput. Phys. Commun. 149 (2002) 103 [hep-ph/0112278]. micrOMEGAs: Version 1.3
29. Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 577 [hep-ph/0405253].
30. MicrOMEGAs 2.0: A Program to calculate the relic density of dark matter in a generic model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 176 (2007) 367 [hep-ph/0607059].
31. G. G. Ross, K. Schmidt-Hoberg and F. Staub, The Generalised NMSSM at One Loop: Fine Tuning and Phenomenology, JHEP 1208 (2012) 074 [arXiv:1205.1509 [hep-ph]].
32. G. G. Ross and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, The Fine-Tuning of the Generalised NMSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 862 (2012) 710 [arXiv:1108.1284 [hep-ph]].
33. S. Cassel, D. M. Ghilencea and G. G. Ross, Fine tuning as an indication of physics beyond the MSSM, Nucl. Phys. B 825 (2010) 203 [arXiv:0903.1115 [hep-ph]].
34. K. Kowalska, S. Munir, L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, S. Trojanowski and Y.-L. S. Tsai, The Constrained NMSSM with a 125 GeV Higgs boson - A global analysis, arXiv:1211.1693 [hep-ph].
35. P. Bechtle, T. Bringmann, K. Desch, H. Dreiner, M. Hamer, C. Hensel, M. Kramer and N. Nguyen, Constrained Supersymmetry after two years of LHC data: a global view with Fittino, JHEP 1206 (2012) 098 [arXiv:1204.4199 [hep-ph]].
36. M. E. Cabrera, J. A. Casas and R. R. de Austri, The health of SUSY after the Higgs discovery and the XENON100 data, arXiv:1212.4821 [hep-ph]
37. A. Fowlie et al., The CMSSM Favoring New Territories: The Impact of New LHC Limits and a 125 GeV Higgs, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 075010 [arXiv:1206.0264].
38. C. Strege, G. Bertone, F. Feroz, M. Fornasa, R. R. de Austri and R. Trotta, Global Fits of the cMSSM and NUHM including the LHC Higgs discovery and new XENON100 constraints, arXiv:1212.2636 [hep-ph].
39. G. Bertone, D. G. Cerdeno, M. Fornasa, R. Ruiz de Austri, C. Strege and R. Trotta, Global fits of the cMSSM including the first LHC and XENON100 data, JCAP 1201 (2012) 015 [arXiv:1107.1715 [hep-ph]].
40. C. Strege, G. Bertone, D. G. Cerdeno, M. Fornasa, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, Updated global fits of the cMSSM including the latest LHC SUSY and Higgs searches and XENON100 data, JCAP 1203 (2012) 030. [arXiv:1112.4192 [hep-ph]].
41. B. C. Allanach, M. A. Parker, Uncertainty in Electroweak Symmetry Breaking in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model and its Impact on Searches For Supersymmetric Particles, JHEP 1302 (2013) 064 [arXiv:1211.3231 [hep-ph]].
42. S. Cassel and D. M. Ghilencea, A Review of naturalness and dark matter prediction for the Higgs mass in MSSM and beyond, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 27 (2012) 1230003 [arXiv:1103.4793 [hep-ph]].
43. S. Cassel, D. M. Ghilencea and G. G. Ross, Testing SUSY at the LHC: Electroweak and Dark matter fine tuning at two-loop order, Nucl. Phys. B 835 (2010) 110 [arXiv:1001.3884 [hep-ph]].
44. Testing SUSY, Phys. Lett. B 687 (2010) 214 [arXiv:0911.1134 [hep-ph]].
45. D. Horton, G. G. Ross, Naturalness and Focus Points with Non-Universal Gaugino Masses, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 221 [arXiv:0908.0857 [hep-ph]].
46. P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis and S. Pokorski, The fine-tuning price of LEP, Phys. Lett. B 423 (1998) 327 [arXiv:hep-ph/9712234].
47. P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis, M. Olechowski and S. Pokorski, Haggling over the finetuning price of LEP, Nucl. Phys. B 544 (1999) 39 [arXiv:hep-ph/9808275].
48. G. L. Kane and S. F. King, Naturalness implications of LEP results, Phys. Lett. B 451 (1999) 113 [arXiv:hep-ph/9810374].
49. P. H. Chankowski, J. R. Ellis, K. A. Olive and S. Pokorski, Cosmological fine tuning, supersymmetry, and the gauge hierarchy problem, Phys. Lett. B 452 (1999) 28 [arXiv:hep-ph/9811284].
50. K. L. Chan, U. Chattopadhyay and P. Nath, Naturalness, weak scale supersymmetry and the prospect for the observation of supersymmetry at the Tevatron and at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 096004 [arXiv:hep-ph/9710473].
51. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, What is the limit on the Higgs mass?, Phys. Lett. B 462 (1999) 144 [arXiv:hep-ph/9905281].
52. G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Living dangerously with low-energy supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 757 (2006) 19 [arXiv:hep-ph/0606105].
53. S. S. AbdusSalam, B. C. Allanach, H. K. Dreiner, J. Ellis, U. Ellwanger, J. Gunion, S. Heinemeyer and M. Kraemer et al., Benchmark Models, Planes, Lines and Points for Future SUSY Searches at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1835 [arXiv:1109.3859 [hep-ph]].
54. B. C. Allanach, SOFTSUSY: a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, Comput. Phys. Commun. 143 (2002) 305 [hep-ph/0104145].
55. G. Aad et al. [ATLAS Collaboration], Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]].
56. S. Chatrchyan et al. [CMS Collaboration], Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]].
57. ATLAS-CONF-2012-162, Updated ATLAS results on the signal strength of the Higgs-like boson for decays into WW and heavy fermion final states, Nov.2012.
58. Report CMS-PAS-HIG-12-045, Combination of standard model Higgs boson searches and measurements of the properties of the new boson with a mass near 125 GeV, 23 Nov 2012.
59. H. K. Dreiner, F. Staub and A. Vicente, General NMSSM signatures at the LHC, arXiv:1211.6987 [hep-ph].
60. M. Carena, K. Kong, E. Ponton and J. Zurita, Supersymmetric Higgs Bosons and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 015001 [arXiv:0909.5434 [hep-ph]].
61. I. Antoniadis, E. Dudas, D. M. Ghilencea and P. Tziveloglou, MSSM Higgs with dimension-six operators, Nucl. Phys. B 831 (2010) 133 [arXiv:0910.1100 [hep-ph]].
62. Beyond the MSSM Higgs with d=6 effective operators, Nucl. Phys. B 848 (2011) 1 [arXiv:1012.5310 [hep-ph]].
63. M. Carena, E. Ponton and J. Zurita, BMSSM Higgs Bosons at the Tevatron and the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 055025 [arXiv:1005.4887 [hep-ph]].
64. BMSSM Higgs Bosons at the 7 TeV LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 035007 [arXiv:1111.2049 [hep-ph]];
65. SUSY Higgs bosons and beyond, PoS DIS 2010 (2010) 212 [arXiv:1006.5014 [hep-ph]].
66. I. Antoniadis et al., MSSM with Dimension-five Operators (MSSM(5)), Nucl. Phys. B 808 (2009) 155 [arXiv:0806.3778 [hep-ph]].