Plant proteogenomics: From protein extraction to improved gene predictions

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 1002, Issue , 2013, Pages 267-294

  Chapman, Brett ^a   Castellana, Natalie ^b   Apffel, Alex ^c   Ghan, Ryan ^d   Cramer, Grant R ^d   Bellgard, Matthew ^a   Haynes, Paul A ^e   Van Sluyter, Steven C ^e  

^a MURDOCH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c AGILENT LABORATORIES   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^e MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

False discovery rate; False positive rate; Inspect; Local false discovery rate; MS GF; P Value; Peptide identification; Posterior error probability; Protein extraction; Proteogenomics; Proteomics; Q Value; Trypsin digest

Indexed keywords

TRYPSIN;

EXTRACTION; GENOMICS; LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PLANT GENOME; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN DEGRADATION; PROTEOGENOMIC; PROTEOMICS; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; DATABASES, PROTEIN; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PEPTIDE MAPPING; PEPTIDES; PLANT PROTEINS; PLANTS; PROTEOMICS; SEARCH ENGINE;

EID: 84892731002     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-360-2_21     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Windsor AJ, Mitchell-Olds T (2006) Comparative genomics as a tool for gene discovery. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:161-167
2. Aivaliotis M, Gevaert K, Falb M et al (2007) Large-scale identi fi cation of N-terminal peptides in the halophilic archaea Halobacterium salinarum and Natronomonas pharaonis. J Proteome Res 6:2195-2204
3. Gallien S, Perrodou E, Carapito C et al (2009) Ortho-proteogenomics: multiple proteomes investigation through orthology and a new MS-based protocol. Genome Res 19:128-135
4. Nielsen P, Krogh A (2005) Large-scale prokaryotic gene prediction and comparison to genome annotation. Bioinformatics 21:4322-4329
5. Jaffe JD, Berg HC, Church GM (2004) Proteogenomic mapping as a complementary method to perform genome annotation. Proteomics 4:59-77
6. Domon B, Aebersold R (2006) Mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 312:212-217
7. Washburn MP, Wolters D, Yates JR 3rd (2001) Large-scale analysis of the yeast proteome by multidimensional protein identi fi cation technology. Nat Biotech 19:242-247
8. Mann M, Pandey A (2001) Use of mass spectrometry- derived data to annotate nucleotide and protein sequence databases. Trends Biochem Sci 26:54-61
9. Ansong C, Purvine SO, Adkins JN, Lipton MS, Smith RD (2008) Proteogenomics: needs and roles to be fi lled by proteomics in genome annotation. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 7:50-62
10. Armengaud J (2009) A perfect genome annotation is within reach with the proteomics and genomics alliance. Curr Opin Microbiol 12:292-300
11. de Groot A, Dulermo R, Ortet P et al (2009) Alliance of proteomics and genomics to unravel the speci fi cities of Sahara bacterium Deinococcus deserti. PLoS Genet 5:e1000434
12. Jaffe JD, Stange-Thomann N, Smith C et al (2004) The complete genome and proteome of Mycoplasma mobile. Genome Res 14: 1447-1461
13. Zivanovic Y, Armengaud J, Lagorce A et al (2009) Genome analysis and genome-wide proteomics of Thermococcus gammatolerans, the most radioresistant organism known amongst the Archaea. Genome Biol 10:R70
14. Hurkman WJ, Tanaka CK (1986) Solubilization of plant membrane proteins for analysis by twodimensional gel electrophoresis. Plant Physiol 81:802-806
15. Vincent D, Wheatley MD, Cramer GR (2006) Optimization of protein extraction and solubilization for mature grape berry clusters. Electrophoresis 27:1853-1865
16. Manza LL, Stamer SL, Ham AJ, Codreanu SG, Liebler DC (2005) Sample preparation and digestion for proteomic analyses using spin fi lters. Proteomics 5:1742-1745
17. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M (2009) Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods 6:359-362
18. Chick JM, Haynes PA, Molloy MP, Bjellqvist B, Baker MS, Len AC (2008) Characterization of the rat liver membrane proteome using peptide immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing. J Proteome Res 7:1036-1045
19. Scherl A, Shaffer SA, Taylor GK, Kulasekara HD, Miller SI, Goodlett DR (2008) Genomespeci fi c gas-phase fractionation strategy for improved shotgun proteomic pro fi ling of proteotypic peptides. Anal Chem 80:1182-1191
20. Panchaud A, Scherl A, Shaffer SA et al (2009) Precursor acquisition independent from ion count: how to dive deeper into the proteomics ocean. Anal Chem 81:6481-6488
21. Yates JR 3rd, Eng JK, McCormack AL, Schieltz D (1995) Method to correlate tandem mass spectra of modi fi ed peptides to amino acid sequences in the protein database. Anal Chem 67:1426-1436
22. Perkins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS (1999) Probability-based protein identi fi cation by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20:3551-3567
23. Pevzner PA, Mulyukov Z, Dancik V, Tang CL (2001) Ef fi ciency of database search for identi fi cation of mutated and modi fi ed proteins via mass spectrometry. Genome Res 11: 290-299
24. Mann M, Wilm M (1994) Error-tolerant identi fi cation of peptides in sequence databases by peptide sequence tags. Anal Chem 66:4390-4399
25. Brosch M, Choudhary J (2010) Scoring and validation of tandem MS peptide identi fi cation methods. Methods Mol Biol 604:43-53
26. States DJ, Omenn GS, Blackwell TW et al (2006) Challenges in deriving high-con fi dence protein identi fi cations from data gathered by a HUPO plasma proteome collaborative study. Nat Biotechnol 24:333-338
27. Elias JE, Gygi SP (2007) Target-decoy search strategy for increased con fi dence in large-scale protein identi fi cations by mass spectrometry. Nat Methods 4:207-214
28. Storey JD, Tibshirani R (2003) Statistical signi fi cance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:9440-9445
29. Choi H, Ghosh D, Nesvizhskii AI (2008) Statistical validation of peptide identi fi cations in large-scale proteomics using the target-decoy database search strategy and fl exible mixture modeling. J Proteome Res 7:286-292
30. Kall L, Storey JD, MacCoss MJ, Noble WS (2008) Posterior error probabilities and false discovery rates: two sides of the same coin. J Proteome Res 7:40-44
31. Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey JD, Tusher V (2001) Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. J Am Stat Assoc 96:1151-1160
32. Alves G, Yu YK (2008) Statistical Characterization of a 1D Random Potential Problem - with applications in score statistics of MS-based peptide sequencing. Physica A 387:6538-6544
33. Kim S, Gupta N, Pevzner PA (2008) Spectral probabilities and generating functions of tandem mass spectra: a strike against decoy databases. J Proteome Res 7:3354-3363
34. Gupta N, Bandeira N, Keich U, Pevzner PA (2011) Target-decoy approach and false discovery rate: when things may go wrong. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 22:1111-1120
35. Venter E, Smith RD, Payne SH (2011) Proteogenomic analysis of bacteria and archaea: a 46 organism case study. PLoS One 6:e27587
36. Castellana NE, Payne SH, Shen Z, Stanke M, Bafna V, Briggs SP (2008) Discovery and revision of Arabidopsis genes by proteogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 21034-21038
37. Tanner S, Shu H, Frank A et al (2005) InsPecT: identi fi cation of posttranslationally modi fi ed peptides from tandem mass spectra. Anal Chem 77:4626-4639
38. Tanner S, Shen Z, Ng J et al (2007) Improving gene annotation using peptide mass spectrometry. Genome Res 17:231-239
39. Desiere F, Deutsch EW, Nesvizhskii AI et al (2005) Integration with the human genome of peptide sequences obtained by high-throughput mass spectrometry. Genome Biol 6:R9
40. Apweiler R, Bairoch A, Wu CH et al (2004) UniProt: the Universal Protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 32:D115-D119
41. Fermin D, Allen BB, Blackwell TW et al (2006) Novel gene and gene model detection using a whole genome open reading frame analysis in proteomics. Genome Biol 7:R35
42. Edwards NJ (2007) Novel peptide identi fi cation from tandem mass spectra using ESTs and sequence database compression. Mol Syst Biol 3:102
43. de Bruijn NG, Erdos P (1946) A combinatorial problem. Koninklijke Netherlands: Academe Van Wetenschappen 49:758-764
44. Bern M, Cai Y, Goldberg D (2007) Lookup peaks: a hybrid of de novo sequencing and database search for protein identi fi cation by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 79:1393-1400
45. Frank A, Pevzner P (2005) PepNovo: de novo peptide sequencing via probabilistic network modeling. Anal Chem 77:964-973
46. Kim S, Gupta N, Bandeira N, Pevzner PA (2009) Spectral dictionaries: integrating de novo peptide sequencing with database search of tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 8:53-69
47. Mo L, Dutta D, Wan Y, Chen T (2007) MSNovo: a dynamic programming algorithm for de novo peptide sequencing via tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chem 79:4870-4878
48. Ma B, Zhang K, Hendrie C et al (2003) PEAKS: powerful software for peptide de novo sequencing by tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 17:2337-2342
49. Pevzner PA, Dancik V, Tang CL (2000) Mutation-tolerant protein identi fi cation by mass spectrometry. J Comput Biol 7:777-787
50. Kim S, Mischerikow N, Bandeira N et al (2010) The generating function of CID, ETD, and CID/ETD pairs of tandem mass spectra: applications to database search. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:2840-2852
51. Gupta N, Pevzner PA (2009) False discovery rates of protein identi fi cations: a strike against the twopeptide rule. J Proteome Res 8:4173-4181
52. Gupta N, Benhamida J, Bhargava V et al (2008) Comparative proteogenomics: combining mass spectrometry and comparative genomics to analyze multiple genomes. Genome Res 18:1133-1142
53. Christie-Oleza JA, Miotello G, Armengaud J (2012) High-throughput proteogenomics of Ruegeria pomeroyi: seeding a better genomic annotation for the whole marine Roseobacter clade. BMC Genomics 13:73
54. Dasari S, Chambers MC, Slebos RJ, Zimmerman LJ, Ham AJ, Tabb DL (2010) TagRecon: highthroughput mutation identi fi cation through sequence tagging. J Proteome Res 9:1716-1726
55. Wang J, Bourne PE, Bandeira N (2011) Peptide identi fi cation by database search of mixture tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 10(M111):010017
56. Zhang N, Li XJ, Ye M, Pan S, Schwikowski B, Aebersold R (2005) ProbIDtree: an automated software program capable of identifying multiple peptides from a single collisioninduced dissociation spectrum collected by a tandem mass spectrometer. Proteomics 5: 4096-4106
57. Wang J, Perez-Santiago J, Katz JE, Mallick P, Bandeira N (2010) Peptide identi fi cation from mixture tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 9:1476-1485