Cognitive ability predicts motor learning on a virtual reality game in patients with TBI

NeuroRehabilitation

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 667-680

  O'Neil, Rochelle L ^a   Skeel, Reid L ^a   Ustinova, Ksenia I ^a  

^a CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive ability; traumatic brain injury; virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; RECREATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VIRTUAL REALITY; VISUAL MEMORY; WORKING MEMORY; YOUNG ADULT;

COGNITIVE ABILITY; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892684600     PISSN: 10538135     EISSN: 18786448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/NRE-130985     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Al-Yahya, E., Dawes, H., Smith, L., Dennis, A., Howells, K., & Cockburn, J. (2011). Cognitive motor interference while walking: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 35, 715-728.
2. Batson, C. D., Brady, R. A., Peters, B. T., Ploutz-Snyder, R. J., Mulavara, A. P., Cohen, H. S., & Bloomberg, J. J. (2011). Gait training improves performance in healthy adults exposed to novel sensory discordant conditions. Experimental Brain Research, 209(4), 515-524.
3. Benton, A. L., & Hamsher, K. (1976). Multilingual aphasia examination. Iowa City: University of Iowa.
4. Berg, K. O., Wood-Dauphinee, S. L., Williams, J. I., & Gay-ton, D. (1989). Measuring balance in the elderly: Preliminary development of an instrument. Physiotherapy Canada, 41, 304-311.
5. Boyd, L. A., Quaney, B. M., Pohl, P. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2007). Learning implicitly: Effects of task and severity after stroke. Neu-rorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 444-454.
6. Catena, R. D., van Donkelaar, P., & Chou, L.-S. (2007). Cognitive task effects on gait stability following concussion. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 23-31.
7. Catena, R. D., van Donkelaar, P., & Chou, L.-S. (2009). Different gait tasks distinguish immediate vs. long-term effects of concussion on balance control. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 6(25). doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-25
8. Cherniack, E. P. (2011). Not just fun and games: Applications of virtual reality in the identification and rehabilitation of cognitive disorders of the elderly. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 6(4), 283-289.
9. Cirstea, M.C., Ptito, A., & Levin, M.F.(2003).Armreachingimprove- ments with short-term practice depend onthe severityofthe motor deficit in stroke. Experimental Brain Research, 152, 476-488.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Colarusso, R. P. & Hammill, D. D. (2003). Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-Third edition. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications, Inc.
12. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001a). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System.San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
13. Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001b). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: Examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
14. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
15. Dikmen, S. S., Corrigan, J. D., Levin, H. S., Machamer, J., Stiers, W., & Weisskopf, M. G. (2009). Cognitive outcome following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma and Rehabilitation, 24(6), 430-438.
16. Eslinger, P.J., Zappalá, G., Chakara, F., & Barrett, A.M.(2007). Cognitive impairments after TBI. In N.D. Zasler, D.I. Katz, & R.D. Zafonte (Eds.), Brain injury medicine: Principles and practice, (pp. 779-790). New York, NY: Demos Medical Publishing.
17. Flanagan, S. R., Cantor, J. B., & Teresa, A. A. (2008). Traumatic brain injury: Future assessment tools and treatment prospects. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, 4(5), 877-892.
18. Halstead, W. C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19. Holden, M. K. (2005). Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: Review. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(3), 187-211.
20. Holtzer, R., Verghese, J., Xue, X., & Lipton, R. B. (2006). Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: Results from the Einstein Aging Study. Neuropsychology, 20(2), 215-223.
21. Kerr, R. (1982). Psychomotor learning. Philadelphia, PA: CBS College Publishing.
22. Kleim, J. A., & Jones, T. A. (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51, S225-S239.
23. Klockgether, T., Schroth, G., Diener, H. C., & Dichgans, J. (1990). Idiopathic cerebellar ataxiaof late onset: Natural history and MRI morphology. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 53, 297-305.
24. Kløve, H. (1963). Clinical neuropsychology. In F.M. Forster (Ed.), The Medical Clinics of North America. New York, NY: Saunders.
25. Levin, M. F. (2011). Can virtual reality offer enriched environments for rehabilitation? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 11(2), 153-155.
26. Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., & Loring, D. W. (2004). Neu-ropsychological Assessment (4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. th ed.). New York, NY: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
28. Matheis, R. J., Schultheis, M. T., Tiersky, L. A., DeLuca, J., Millis, S. R., & Rizzo, A. (2007). Is learning and memory different in a virtual environment? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 146-161.
29. Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial: Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
30. Mumford, N., & Wilson, P. H. (2009). Virtual reality in acquired brain injury upper limb rehabilitation: Evidence-based evaluation of clinical research. Brain Injury, 23(3), 179-191.
31. Pearson Assessment. (2009). Advanced Clinical Solutions for the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
32. Rand, D., Katz, N., Shahar, M., Kizony, R., & Weiss, P. L. (2005). The virtual mall: Afunctional virtual environment for stroke rehabilitation. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 3, 193-198.
33. Robinson-Riegler, G., & Robinson-Riegler, B.(2004). Cognitive psychology: Applying the science of the mind. Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
34. Rose, D. F., Brooks, B. M., & Rizzo, A. A. (2005). Virtual reality in brain damage rehabilitation: Review. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 8(3), 241-271.
35. Schmidt, R. A., & Wrisberg, C. A. (2004). Motor learning and performance (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc.
36. Schultheis, M. T., Himelstein, J., & Rizzo, A. A. (2002). Virtual reality and neuropsychology: Upgrading the current tools. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 17(5), 378-394.
37. Smith, A. (1991). Symbol Digit Modalities Test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
38. Sosnoff, J. J., Broglio, S. P., & Ferrara, M. S. (2008). Cognitive and motor function are associated following mild traumatic brain injury. Experimental Brain Research, 187, 563-571.
39. Suárez, H., Suárez, A., & Lavinsky, L. (2006). Postural adaptation in elderly patients with instability and risk of falling after balance training using a virtual-reality system. International Tinnitus Journal, 12(1), 41-44.
40. Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
41. Wechsler, D. (2009a). Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
42. Wechsler, D. (2009b). Wechsler Memory Scale-Fourth edition: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education, Inc.
43. Winstein, C. J., Merians, A. S., & Sullivan, K. J. (1999). Motor learning after unilateral brain damage.Neuropsychologia, 37, 975-987.
44. Wrisley, D. M., Marchetti, G. F., Kuharsky, D. K., & Whitney, S. L. (2004). Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. Journal of the American Physical Therapy Association, 84(10), 906-918.
45. Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44(1), 75-84.
46. Zhang, L., Abreu, B. C., Seale, G. S., Masel, B., Christiansen, C. H., & Ottenbacher, K. J. (2003). A virtual reality environment for evaluation of a daily living skill in brain injury rehabilitation: Reliability and validity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 84, 1118-1124.