Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) scale for capturing affected arm-use after stroke: Development, reliability, and validity

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Simpson, Lisa A ^a,b   Eng, Janice J ^a,b   Backman, Catherine L ^a   Miller, William C ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b GF STRONG REHABILITATION CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMMUNITY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RATING OF EVERYDAY ARM USE IN THE COMMUNITY AND HOME SCALE; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDITY; VERY ELDERLY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; ARM; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; STROKE;

EID: 84892666732     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083405     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Rand D, Eng JJ (2012) Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 26: 76-84.
2. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ (1995) Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26: 982-989.
3. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Vignolo M, McCulloch K (2005) Reliability and validity of the upper extremity Motor Activity Log-14 for measuring real-world arm use. Stroke 36: 2493-2496.
4. Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, Light K, Thompson PA (2006) The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology 67: 1189-1194.
5. Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, Zeringue A, Hobbs L, et al. (2006) Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87: 1340-1345.
6. Sandelowski M (2000) Focus on research methods-whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23: 334-340.
7. Rand D, Eng JJ (2010) Arm-Hand use in healthy older adults. Amer J Occup Ther 64: 877-885.
8. Gebruers N, Truijen S, Engelborghs S, Nagels G, Brouns R, et al. (2008) Actigraphic measurement of motor deficits in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 26: 533-540.
9. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, et al. (1999) The Stroke Impact Scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke 30: 2131-2140.
10. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, Kim I-, di Bella P, et al. (2005) Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil 19: 404-411.
11. Gowland C, Stratford P, Ward M, Moreland J, Torresin W, et al. (1993) Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 24: 58-63.
12. van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, De Vet HC, Bouter LM (2004) Clinimetric properties of the Motor Activity Log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke 35: 1410-1414.
13. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86: 420-428.
14. Brenner H, Kliebsch U (1996) Dependence of weighted kappa coefficients on the number of categories. Epidemiology 7: 199-202.
15. Bonett DG (2002) Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med 21: 1331-1335.
16. rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
17. Haaland KY, Mutha PK, Rinehart JK, Daniels M, Cushnyr B, et al. (2012) Relationship between arm usage and instrumental activities of daily living after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93: 1957-1962.
18. Rinehart JK, Singleton RD, Adair JC, Sadek JR, Haaland KY (2009) Arm use after left or right hemiparesis is influenced by hand preference. Stroke 40: 545-550.
19. Barreca S, Gowland CK, Stratford P, Huijbregts M, Griffiths J, et al. (2004) Development of the Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory: theoretical constructs, item generation, and selection. Top Stroke Rehabil 11: 31-42.
20. Harris JE, Eng JJ (2007) Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther 87: 88-97.
21. Lang CE, Wagner JM, Edwards DF, Dromerick AW (2007) Upper extremity use in people with hemiparesis in the first few weeks after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 31: 56-63.
22. Chen HF, Lin KC, Wu CY, Chen CL (2012) Rasch validation and predictive validity of the action research arm test in patients receiving stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93: 1039-1045.
23. Michielsen ME, de Niet M, Ribbers GM, Stam HJ, Bussmann JB (2009) Evidence of a logarithmic relationship between motor capacity and actual performance in daily life of the paretic arm following stroke. J Rehabil Med 41: 327-331.
24. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier R, Hahn MG, Sahrmann SA, et al. (2006) Relationships between upper-limb functional limitation and self-reported disability 3 months after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 43: 401-408.
25. van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, van Woerden R, Seelen HA (2011) Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 92: 1437-1442.
26. Thrane G, Emaus N, Askim T, Anke A (2011) Arm use in patients with subacute stroke monitored by accelerometry: association with motor impairment and influence on self-dependence. J Rehabil Med 43: 299-304.