The cell biology of open and closed mitosis

Nucleus (United States)

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 160-165

  Boettcher, Barbara ^a   Barral, Yves ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Asymmetric cell division; Closed mitosis; Compartmentalization; Nuclear envelope; Open mitosis

Indexed keywords

EXTRACHROMOSOMAL DNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR ACE 2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CYTOLOGY; DYNAMICS; HUMAN; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; SISTER CHROMATID; AMOEBOZOA; ANIMAL; FUNGUS; GENETICS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPINDLE APPARATUS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

AMOEBOZOA; ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; FUNGI; MITOSIS; NUCLEAR ENVELOPE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SPINDLE APPARATUS;

EID: 84892634745     PISSN: 19491034     EISSN: 19491042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/nucl.24676     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Cavalier-Smith T. Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution. Biol Direct 2010; 5:7; PMID:20132544; http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-5-7.
2. Baldauf SL, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF. A kingdom-level phylogeny of eukaryotes based on combined protein data. Science 2000; 290:972-7; PMID:11062127; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5493.972.
3. Patterson DJ. The Diversity of Eukaryotes. Am Nat 1999; 154(s4):S96-124; PMID:10527921; http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/303287.
4. Hampl V, Hug L, Leigh JW, Dacks JB, Lang BF, Simpson AGB, et al. Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic "supergroups". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:3859-64; PMID:19237557; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0807880106.
5. Mortimer RK, Johnston JR. Life span of individual yeast cells. Nature 1959; 183:1751-2; PMID:13666896; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/1831751a0.
6. Hartwell LH, Unger MW. Unequal division in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its implications for the control of cell division. J Cell Biol 1977; 75:422-35; PMID:400873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.75.2.422.
7. Kennedy BK, Austriaco NR Jr., Guarente L. Daughter cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from old mothers display a reduced life span. J Cell Biol 1994; 127:1985-93; PMID:7806576; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.127.6.1985.
8. Bobola N, Jansen RP, Shin TH, Nasmyth K. Asymmetric accumulation of Ash1p in postanaphase nuclei depends on a myosin and restricts yeast mating-type switching to mother cells. Cell 1996; 84:699-709; PMID:8625408; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81048-X.
9. Colman-Lerner A, Chin TE, Brent R. Yeast Cbk1 and Mob2 activate daughter-specific genetic programs to induce asymmetric cell fates. Cell 2001; 107:739-50; PMID:11747810; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00596-7.
10. Sil A, Herskowitz I. Identification of asymmetrically localized determinant, Ash1p, required for lineagespecific transcription of the yeast HO gene. Cell 1996; 84:711-22; PMID:8625409; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81049-1.
11. Boettcher B, Marquez-Lago TT, Bayer M, Weiss EL, Barral Y. Nuclear envelope morphology constrains diffusion and promotes asymmetric protein segregation in closed mitosis. J Cell Biol 2012; 197:921-37; PMID:22711697; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201112117.
12. Shcheprova Z, Baldi S, Frei SB, Gonnet G, Barral Y. A mechanism for asymmetric segregation of age during yeast budding. Nature 2008; 454:728-34; PMID:18660802.
13. Gehlen LR, Nagai S, Shimada K, Meister P, Taddei A, Gasser SM. Nuclear geometry and rapid mitosis ensure asymmetric episome segregation in yeast. Curr Biol 2011; 21:25-33; PMID:21194950; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.016.
14. Mazanka E, Alexander J, Yeh BJ, Charoenpong P, Lowery DM, Yaffe M, et al. The NDR/LATS family kinase Cbk1 directly controls transcriptional asymmetry. PLoS Biol 2008; 6:e203; PMID:18715118; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060203.
15. Mazanka E, Weiss EL. Sequential counteracting kinases restrict an asymmetric gene expression program to early G1. Mol Biol Cell 2010; 21:2809-20; PMID:20573982; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E10-02-0174.
16. Balazs A, Batta G, Miklos I, Acs-Szabo L, Vazquez de Aldana CR, Sipiczki M. Conserved regulators of the cell separation process in Schizosaccharomyces. Fungal Genet Biol 2012; 49:235-49; PMID:22300943; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fgb.2012.01.003.
17. Kelly MT, MacCallum DM, Clancy SD, Odds FC, Brown AJP, Butler G. The Candida albicans CaACE2 gene affects morphogenesis, adherence and virulence. Mol Microbiol 2004; 53:969-83; PMID:15255906; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04185.x.
18. Stead DA, Walker J, Holcombe L, Gibbs SRS, Yin Z, Selway L, et al. Impact of the transcriptional regulator, Ace2, on the Candida glabrata secretome. Proteomics 2010; 10:212-23; PMID:19941307; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200800706.
19. Martín-Cuadrado AB, Dueñas E, Sipiczki M, Vázquez de Aldana CR, del Rey F. The endobeta-1,3-glucanase eng1p is required for dissolution of the primary septum during cell separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:1689-98; PMID:12665550; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.00377.
20. Dohrmann PR, Butler G, Tamai K, Dorland S, Greene JR, Thiele DJ, et al. Parallel pathways of gene regulation: homologous regulators SWI5 and ACE2 differentially control transcription of HO and chitinase. Genes Dev 1992; 6:93-104; PMID:1730413; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.6.1.93.
21. Petit CS, Mehta S, Roberts RH, Gould KL. Ace2p contributes to fission yeast septin ring assembly by regulating mid2+ expression. J Cell Sci 2005; 118:5731-42; PMID:16317047; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02687.
22. Sinclair DA, Guarente L. Extrachromosomal rDNA circles--a cause of aging in yeast. Cell 1997; 91:1033-42; PMID:9428525; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80493-6.
23. Henderson KA, Gottschling DE. A mother's sacrifice: what is she keeping for herself? Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008; 20:723-8; PMID:18848886; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2008.09.004.
24. Falcón AA, Aris JP. Plasmid accumulation reduces life span in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:41607-17; PMID:12904293; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307025200.
25. Lindstrom DL, Leverich CK, Henderson KA, Gottschling DE. Replicative Age Induces Mitotic Recombination in the Ribosomal RNA Gene Cluster of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Rine J, ed. PLoS Genet 2011; 7:1002015.
26. Ouellet J, Barral Y. Organelle segregation during mitosis: lessons from asymmetrically dividing cells. J Cell Biol 2012; 196:305-13; PMID:22312002; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201102078.
27. Gillespie CS, Proctor CJ, Boys RJ, Shanley DP, Wilkinson DJ, Kirkwood TBL. A mathematical model of ageing in yeast. J Theor Biol 2004; 229:189-96; PMID:15207474; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.03.015.
28. Heyer WD, Sipiczki M, Kohli J. Replicating plasmids in Schizosaccharomyces pombe: improvement of symmetric segregation by a new genetic element. Mol Cell Biol 1986; 6:80-9; PMID:3023839.
29. Anziano PQ, Perlman PS, Lang BF, Wolf K. The mitochondrial genome of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Curr Genet 1983; 7:273-84; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00376072.
30. Fournier P, Gaillardin C, Louvencourt L, Heslot H, Lang BF, Kaudewitz F. r-DNA plasmid from Schizosaccharomyces pombe: cloning and use in yeast transformation. Curr Genet 1982; 6:31-8; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00397639.
31. Kubai DF, Ris H. Division in the dinof lagellate Gyrodinium cohnii (Schiller). A new type of nuclear reproduction. J Cell Biol 1969; 40:508-28; PMID:5761923; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.40.2.508.
32. Perret E, Davoust J, Albert M, Besseau L, Soyer-Gobillard MO. Microtubule organization during the cell cycle of the primitive eukaryote dinoflagellate Crypthecodinium cohnii. J Cell Sci 1993; 104:639-51; PMID:8314867.
33. Barlow SB, Triemer RE. The mitotic apparatus in the dinoflagellateAmphidinium carterae. Protoplasma 1988; 145:16-26; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01323252.
34. Castagnetti S, Oliferenko S, Nurse P. Fission Yeast Cells Undergo Nuclear Division in the Absence of Spindle Microtubules. Lichten M, ed. Plos Biol 2010; 8(10):e1000512.
35. Zheng L, Schwartz C, Magidson V, Khodjakov A, Oliferenko S. The spindle pole bodies facilitate nuclear envelope division during closed mitosis in fission yeast. PLoS Biol 2007; 5:e170; PMID:17579515; http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050170.
36. West RR, Vaisberg EV, Ding R, Nurse P, McIntosh JR. cut11(+): A gene required for cell cycle-dependent spindle pole body anchoring in the nuclear envelope and bipolar spindle formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 1998; 9:2839-55; PMID:9763447.
37. Toya M, Sato M, Haselmann U, Asakawa K, Brunner D, Antony C, et al. γ-tubulin complex-mediated anchoring of spindle microtubules to spindle-pole bodies requires Msd1 in fission yeast. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:646-53; PMID:17486116; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1593.
38. Khodjakov A, La Terra S, Chang F. Laser microsurgery in fission yeast; role of the mitotic spindle midzone in anaphase B. Curr Biol 2004; 14:1330-40; PMID:15296749; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.028.
39. King MC, Lusk CP, Blobel G. Karyopherin-mediated import of integral inner nuclear membrane proteins. Nature 2006; 442:1003-7; PMID:16929305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05075.
40. Rodríguez-Navarro S, Igual JC, Pérez-Ortín JE. SRC1: an intron-containing yeast gene involved in sister chromatid segregation. Yeast 2002; 19:43-54; PMID:11754482; http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/yea.803.
41. Huang J, Brito IL, Villén J, Gygi SP, Amon A, Moazed D. Inhibition of homologous recombination by a cohesin-associated clamp complex recruited to the rDNA recombination enhancer. Genes Dev 2006; 20:2887-901; PMID:17043313; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.1472706.
42. Mekhail K, Seebacher J, Gygi SP, Moazed D. Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering in maintenance of genome stability. Nature 2008; 456:667-70; PMID:18997772; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07460.
43. Grund SE, Fischer T, Cabal GG, Antúnez O, Pérez-Ortín JE, Hurt E. The inner nuclear membrane protein Src1 associates with subtelomeric genes and alters their regulated gene expression. J Cell Biol 2008; 182:897-910; PMID:18762579; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200803098.
44. Yam C, He Y, Zhang D, Chiam KH, Oliferenko S. Divergent strategies for controlling the nuclear membrane satisfy geometric constraints during nuclear division. Curr Biol 2011; 21:1314-9; PMID:21802294; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.052.
45. Aoki K, Hayashi H, Furuya K, Sato M, Takagi T, Osumi M, et al. Breakage of the nuclear envelope by an extending mitotic nucleus occurs during anaphase in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Genes Cells 2011; 16:911-26; PMID:21733045; http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01540.x.
46. Straube A, Weber I, Steinberg G. A novel mechanism of nuclear envelope break-down in a fungus: nuclear migration strips off the envelope. EMBO J 2005; 24:1674-85; PMID:15861140; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600644.
47. Theisen U, Straube A, Steinberg G. Dynamic rearrangement of nucleoporins during fungal "open" mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:1230-40; PMID:18172026; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-02-0130.
48. Gonzalez Y, Meerbrey K, Chong J, Torii Y, Padte NN, Sazer S. Nuclear shape, growth and integrity in the closed mitosis of fission yeast depend on the Ran-GTPase system, the spindle pole body and the endoplasmic reticulum. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:2464-72; PMID:19571115; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jcs.049999.
49. Lim HWG, Huber G, Torii Y, Hirata A, Miller J, Sazer S. Vesicle-Like Biomechanics Governs Important Aspects of Nuclear Geometry in Fission Yeast. Secomb T, ed. PLoS ONE 2007; 2(9):e948.
50. Winey M, Yarar D, Giddings TH Jr., Mastronarde DN. Nuclear pore complex number and distribution throughout the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell cycle by three-dimensional reconstruction from electron micrographs of nuclear envelopes. Mol Biol Cell 1997; 8:2119-32; PMID:9362057.
51. Jorgensen P, Edgington NP, Schneider BL, Rupes I, Tyers M, Futcher B. The size of the nucleus increases as yeast cells grow. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18:3523-32; PMID:17596521; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-10-0973.
52. Neumann FR, Nurse P. Nuclear size control in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 2007; 179:593-600; PMID:17998401; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200708054.
53. Güttinger S, Laurell E, Kutay U. Orchestrating nuclear envelope disassembly and reassembly during mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:178-91; PMID:19234477; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrm2641.
54. Rose A. Open mitosis: nuclear envelope dynamics. Cell Division Control in Plants 2008; 207-30.
55. Lénárt P, Rabut G, Daigle N, Hand AR, Terasaki M, Ellenberg J. Nuclear envelope breakdown in starfish oocytes proceeds by partial NPC disassembly followed by a rapidly spreading fenestration of nuclear membranes. J Cell Biol 2003; 160:1055-68; PMID:12654902; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200211076.
56. Terasaki M. Dynamics of the endoplasmic reticulum and golgi apparatus during early sea urchin development. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:897-914; PMID:10712508.
57. Katsani KR, Karess RE, Dostatni N, Doye V. In vivo dynamics of Drosophila nuclear envelope components. Mol Biol Cell 2008; 19:3652-66; PMID:18562695; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E07-11-1162.
58. Wagner N, Kagermeier B, Loserth S, Krohne G. The Drosophila melanogaster LEM-domain protein MAN1. Eur J Cell Biol 2006; 85:91-105; PMID:16439308; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.10.002.
59. Harel A, Zlotkin E, Nainudel-Epszteyn S, Feinstein N, Fisher PA, Gruenbaum Y. Persistence of major nuclear envelope antigens in an envelope-like structure during mitosis in Drosophila melanogaster embryos. J Cell Sci 1989; 94:463-70; PMID:2517292.
60. Lee KK, Gruenbaum Y, Spann P, Liu J, Wilson KL. C. elegans nuclear envelope proteins emerin, MAN1, lamin, and nucleoporins reveal unique timing of nuclear envelope breakdown during mitosis. Mol Biol Cell 2000; 11:3089-99; PMID:10982402.
61. Lee KK, Starr D, Cohen M, Liu J, Han M, Wilson KL, et al. Lamin-dependent localization of UNC-84, a protein required for nuclear migration in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13:892-901; PMID:11907270; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.01-06-0294.
62. Anderson DJ, Hetzer MW. Reshaping of the endoplasmic reticulum limits the rate for nuclear envelope formation. J Cell Biol 2008; 182:911-24; PMID:18779370; http://dx.doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200805140.
63. Anderson DJ, Hetzer MW. Nuclear envelope formation by chromatin-mediated reorganization of the endoplasmic reticulum. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9:1160-6; PMID:17828249; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb1636.
64. Antonin W, Ellenberg J, Dultz E. Nuclear pore complex assembly through the cell cycle: regulation and membrane organization. FEBS Lett 2008; 582:2004-16; PMID:18328825; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.067.