The hardest butter to button: Immediate context effects in spoken word identification

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 114-123

  Brock, Jon ^a   Nation, Kate ^b  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Context; Eye movements; Language; Speech perception; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COMPREHENSION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COMPREHENSION; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBABILITY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892503613     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.791331     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altmann, G. T. M. (2011). Language can mediate eye movement control within 100 milliseconds, regardless of whether there is anything to move the eyes to. Acta Psychologica, 137, 190-200. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.009
2. Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition, 73, 247-264. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00059-1
3. Barr, D. J. (2008). Pragmatic expectations and linguistic evidence: Listeners anticipate but do not integrate common ground. Cognition, 109, 18-40. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.005
4. Barr, D. J., Gann, T. M., & Pierce, R. S. (2011). Anticipatory baseline effects and information integration in visual world studies. Acta Psychologica, 137, 201-207. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.09.011
5. Bates, D. M. (2005). Fitting linear mixed models in R. R News, 5, 27-30.
6. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2001). Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 967-985.
7. van den Brink, D., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). The cascaded nature of lexical selection and integration in auditory sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 364-372.
8. Brock, J., Norbury, C. F., Einav, S., & Nation, K. (2008). Do individuals with autism process words in context? Evidence from language-mediated eye-movements. Cognition, 108, 896-904. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.007
9. Chen, L., & Boland, J. E. (2008). Dominance and context effects on activation of alternative homophone meanings. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1306-1323. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1306
10. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84-107. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(74)90005-X
11. Dahan, D. (2010). The time course of interpretation in speech comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 121-126. doi: 10.1177/0963721410364726
12. Dahan, D., & Magnuson, J. S. (2006). Spoken word recognition. In M. J. Traxler & M. A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 249-284). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
13. Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 498-513.
14. DataViewer software (version 1.10.1) [Computer software]. Mississauga, ON: SR Research.
15. Experiment Builder software (version 1.6.1) [Computer software]. Mississauga, ON: SR Research.
16. Forster, K. I. (1976). Accessing the mental lexicon. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Ed.), New approaches to language mechanisms, (pp. 257-287). Amsterdam: North Holland.
17. Gaskell, M. G., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2002). Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cognitive Psychology, 45, 220-266. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00003-8
18. Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech: Semantic ERP effects. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1518-1530. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00052-X
19. Huettig, F., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2007). Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition, 15, 985-1018. doi: 10.1080/13506280601130875
20. Janse, E., & Quené, H. (2004). On measuring multiple lexical activation using the cross-modal semantic priming technique. In QuenéH. & V. J. v. Heuven (Ed.), On speech and language: Studies for Sieb G. Nooteboom, (pp. 105-114). Utrecht: LOT.
21. Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 133-159. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
22. Lucas, M. (1999). Context effects in lexical access: A meta-analysis. Memory & Cognition, 27, 385-398. doi: 10.3758/BF03211535
23. Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1-36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
24. Magnuson, J. S., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Immediate effects of form-class constraints on spoken word recognition. Cognition, 108, 866-873. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.005
25. Marslen-Wilson, W. (1984). Function and process in spoken word recognition. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhis (Ed.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes, (pp. 125-150). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Marslen-Wilson, W., & Welsh, A. (1978). Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 29-63. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(78)90018-X
27. Matin, E., Shao, K. C., & Boff, K. R. (1993). Saccadic overhead: Information-processing time with and without saccades. Perception and Psychophysics, 53, 372-380. doi: 10.3758/BF03206780
28. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
29. McMurray, B., Clayards, M. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 1064-1071. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.6.1064
30. Norris, D. (1986). Word recognition: Context effects without priming. Cognition, 22, 93-136. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(86)90001-6
31. Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist-A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52, 189-234. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
32. Norris, D., & McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: A Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115, 357-395. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.357
33. Onifer, W., & Swinney, D. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cognition, 9, 225-236. doi: 10.3758/BF03196957
34. Penolazzi, B., Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2007). Early semantic context integration and lexical access as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Biological Psychology, 74, 374-388. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.09.008
35. Revill, K. P., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Aslin, R. N. (2008). Context and spoken word recognition in a novel lexicon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1207-1223.
36. Salasoo, A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1985). Interaction of knowledge sources in spoken word identification. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 210-231. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90025-7
37. Tanenhaus, M. K., Carlson, G. N., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Do listeners compute linguistic representations?. In D. R. Dowty, L. Kartunnen & A. M. Zwicky (Ed.), Natural language parsing: Psycholinguistic, theoretical and computational perspectives, (pp. 359-408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632-1634. doi: 10.1126/science.7777863
39. Twilley, L. C., & Dixon, P. (2000). Meaning resolution processes for words: A parallel independent model. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 49-82. doi: 10.3758/BF03210725
40. Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Rubin, S., Plante, E., & Parks, M. (1999). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 394-417.
41. Weber, A., & Crocker, M. W. (2012). On the nature of semantic constraints on lexical access. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 195-214. doi: 10.1007/s10936-011-9184-0
42. Zwitserlood, P. (1989). The locus of the effects of sentential-semantic context in spoken-word processing. Cognition, 32, 25-64. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(89)90013-9