A molecular-based approach for examining responses of eukaryotes in microcosms to contaminant-spiked estuarine sediments

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 359-369

  Chariton, Anthony A ^a   Ho, Kay T ^b   Proestou, Dina ^b   Bik, Holly ^c   Simpson, Stuart L ^a   Portis, Lisa M ^b   Cantwell, Mark G ^b   Baguley, Jeffrey G ^d   Burgess, Robert M ^b   Pelletier, Marguerite M ^b   Perron, Monique ^b   Gunsch, Claudia ^e   Matthews, Robin A ^f  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^e USA   (United States)

^f WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

18S rRNA; Environmental DNA (e DNA); Metabarcoding; Next generation sequencing; Triclosan

Indexed keywords

18S RRNA; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA (E-DNA); METABARCODING; NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING; TRICLOSAN;

DNA SEQUENCES; GENE ENCODING; IMPURITIES; RNA;

SEDIMENTS;

DNA 18S; TRICLOSAN; RIBOSOME DNA; TOPICAL ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; WATER POLLUTANT;

BENTHOS; BIVALVE; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ESTUARINE SEDIMENT; EUKARYOTE; MICROCOSM; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; NEMATODE; PHENOL; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE;

AMPLICON; ARTICLE; BENTHOS; BIVALVE; CONTAMINANT SPIKED ESTUARINE SEDIMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; ERYTHROCYTE SEDIMENTATION RATE; ESTUARINE SPECIES; EUKARYOTE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; INVERTEBRATE; MACROFAUNA; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MEIOFAUNA; MICROCOSM; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHYLUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROSEQUENCING; SEDIMENT; WATER CONTAMINATION; ANIMAL; BIODIVERSITY; CLASSIFICATION; DRUG EFFECTS; ESTUARY; GENETICS; TOXICITY; WATER POLLUTANT;

BIVALVIA; CHROMADOREA; EUKARYOTA; INVERTEBRATA; KINORHYNCHA; METAZOA; OTUS;

ANIMALS; ANTI-INFECTIVE AGENTS, LOCAL; BIODIVERSITY; DNA, RIBOSOMAL; ESTUARIES; EUKARYOTA; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRICLOSAN; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84892486533     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2450     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baird DJ, Hajibabaei M. 2012. Biomonitoring 2.0: A new paradigm in ecosystem assessment made possible by next-generation DNA sequencing. Mol Ecol 21:2039-2044.
2. Chariton AA, Batley GE, Hardy CM. 2010. Improving aquatic ecological assessment. Integrated Environ Assess Manage 6:187-189.
3. Luoma SN. 1996. The developing framework of marine ecotoxicology: Pollutants as a variable in marine ecosystems? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:29-55.
4. Trannum HC, Olsgard F, Skei JM, Indrehus J, Øverås S, Eriksen J. 2004. Effects of copper, cadmium and contaminated harbour sediments on recolonisation of soft-bottom communities. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 310:87-114.
5. Hare L, Tessier A, Warren L. 2001. Cadmium accumulation by invertebrates living at the sediment-water interface. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:880-889.
6. Hill NA, Johnston EL, King CK, Simpson SL. 2011. Physico-chemical changes in metal-spiked sediments deployed in the field: Implications for the interpretation of in situ studies. Chemosphere 83:400-408.
7. Chariton A. 2005. Responses in estuarine macrobenthic invertebrate assemblages to trace metal contaminated sediments. PhD thesis. University of Canberra, Brue, Australia.
8. Chandler GT, Coull BC, Schizas NV, Donelan TL. 1997. A culture-based assessment of the effects of chlorpyrifos on multiple meiobenthic copepods using microcosms of intact sediments. Environ Toxicol Chem 16:2339-2346.
9. Ho KT, Chariton AA, Portis LM, Proestou D, Cantwell MG, Baguley JG, Burgess RM, Simpson S, Pelletier MC, Perron MM, Gunsch CK, Bik HM, Katz D, Kamikawa A. 2012. Use of a novel sediment exposure to determine the effects of triclosan on estuarine benthic communities. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:384-392.
10. Orvos DR, Versteeg DJ, Inauen J, Capdevielle M, Rothenstein A, Cunningham V. 2002. Aquatic toxicity of triclosan. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1338-1349.
11. Brausch JM, Rand GM. 2011. A review of personal care products in the aquatic environment: Environmental concentrations and toxicity. Chemosphere 82:1518-1532.
12. Dann AB, Hontela A. 2011. Triclosan: Environmental exposure, toxicity and mechanisms of action. J Appl Toxicol 31:285-311.
13. Bedoux G, Roig B, Thomas O, Dupont V, Le Bot B. 2012. Occurrence and toxicity of antimicrobial triclosan and by-products in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:1044-1065.
14. Creer S, Fonseca VG, Porazinska DL, Giblin-Davis RM, Sung W, Power DM, Packer M, Carvalho GR, Blaxter ML, Lambshead PJ, Thomas WK. 2010. Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: Practice, pitfalls and promises. Mol Ecol 19:4-20.
15. Caporaso J, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman F, Costello EK, Fierer N, Gonzalez Pea A, Goodrich JK, Gordon JI, Huttleyu GA, Kelley ST, Knights D, Koenig JE, Ley RE, Lozupone CA, McDonald D, Muegge BD, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky JR, Turnbaugh PJ, Walters WA, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T, Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7:335-336.
16. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460-2461.
17. Fonseca VG, Carvalho GR, Sung W, Johnson HF, Power DM, Neill SP, Packer M, Blaxter HL, Lambshead JD, Thomas WK, Creer S. 2010. Second-generation environmental sequencing unmasks marine metazoan biodiversity. Nat Commun. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1095.
18. Chariton AA, Court LN, Hartley DM, Colloff MJ, Hardy CM. 2010. Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA. Front Ecol Environ 8:233-238.
19. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792-1797.
20. D'Agostino RB, Belanger A, D'Agostino RB Jr. 1990. A suggestion for using powerful and informative tests of normality. Am Stat 44:316-321.
21. Levene H. 1960. Robusts test for equality of variances. In Olkin I, Ghurye S, Woeffding W, Madow W, Mann H, eds, Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, USA, pp 278-291.
22. Ben-Hur A, Guyon I. 2003. Detecting stable clusters using principal component analysis in methods in molecular biology. In Brownstein MJ, Kohodursky A, eds, Functional Genomics:Methods and Protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, USA, pp 159-182.
23. Everitt BS. 1993. Cluster Analysis, 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.
24. R-Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
25. Bik HM, Sung W, De Ley P, Baldwin JG, Sharma J, Rocha-Olivares A, Thomas WK. 2012. Metagenetic community analysis of microbial eukaryotes illuminates biogeographic patterns in deep-sea and shallow water sediments. Mol Ecol 21:1048-1059.
26. Bongers T. 1990. The maturity index: An ecological measure of environmental disturbance based on nematode species composition. Oecologia 83:14-19.
27. Hermi M, Mahmoudi E, Beyrem H, Aissa P, Essid N. 2009. Responses of a free-living marine nematode community to mercury contamination: Results from microcosm experiments. Arch Environ Contam 56:426-433.
28. Arthington A, Yeates G, Conrick D. 1986. Nematodes, including a new record of Tobrilus diversipapillatus in Australia, as potential indicators of sewage effluent pollution. Mar Freshwater Res 37:159-166.
29. Moens T, Vierstraete A, Vincx M. 1996. Life strategies in two bacterivorous marine nematodes: Preliminary results. Mar Ecol 17:509-518.
30. Perron MM, Ho KT, Cantwell MG, Burgess RM, Pelletier MC. 2012. Effects of triclosan on marine benthic and epibenthic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1861-1866.
31. DeLorenzo ME, Keller JM, Arthur CD, Finnegan MC, Harper HE, Winder VL, Zdankiewicz DL. 2008. Toxicity of the antimicrobial compound triclosan and formation of the metabolite methyl-triclosan in estuarine systems. Environ Toxicol 23:224-232.
32. Bik HM, Halanych KM, Sharma J, Thomas WK. 2012. Dramatic shifts in benthic microbial eukaryote communities following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. PLoS ONE 7:e38550.
33. Potvin M, Lovejoy C. 2009. PCR-based diversity estimates of artificial and environmental 18S rRNA gene libraries. J Euk Microbiol 56:174-181.
34. Bhadury P, Austen M. 2010. Barcoding marine nematodes: An improved set of nematode 18S rRNA primers to overcome eukaryotic co-interference. Hydrobiologia 641:245-251.
35. Tang CQ, Leasi F, Obertegger U, Kieneke A, Barraclough TG, Fontaneto D. 2012. The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:16208-16212.
36. McTaggart S, Dudycha JL, Omilian A, Crease TJ. 2007. Rates of recombination in the ribosomal DNA of apomictically propagated Daphnia obtusa lines. Genetics 175:311-320.
37. Yoccoz NG, Bråthen KA, Gielly L, Haile J, Edwards ME, Goslar T, Von Stedingk H, Brysting AK, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Sonstebo JH, Miquel C, Valentini A, De Bello F, Chave J, Thuiller W, Wincker P, Cruaud C, Gavory F, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP, Orlando L, Brochmann C, Willerslev E, Taberlet P. DNA from soil mirrors plant taxonomic and growth form diversity. Mol Ecol 21:3647-3655.
38. Corliss JO. 2002. Biodiversity and biocomplexity of the protists and an overview of their significant roles in maintenance of our biosphere. Acta Protozool 41:199-220.
39. Foissner W. 1987. Soil protozoa: Fundamental problems, ecological significance, adaptations in ciliates and testaceans, bioindicators, and guide to the literature. Prog Protistol 2:69-212.
40. Lubarsky HV, Gerbersdorf SU, Hubas C, Behrens S, Ricciardi F, Paterson DM. 2012. Impairment of the bacterial biofilm stability by triclosan. Plos One 7:e31183.
41. Coull BC, Wells JBJ. 1981. Density of mud-dwelling meiobenthos from three sites in the Wellington region. New Zeal J Mar Fresh 15:411-415.
42. Sutherland TF, Levings CD, Petersen SA, Poon P, Piercey B. 2007. The use of meiofauna as an indicator of benthic organic enrichment associated with salmonid aquaculture. Mar Pollut Bull 54:1249-1261.
43. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E. 2012. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol 21:2045-2050.
44. Coissac E, Riaz T, Puillandre N. 2012. Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals. Mol Ecol 21:1834-1847.
45. Raffaelli D, Moller H. 1999. Manipulative field experiments in animal ecology: Do they promise more than they can deliver?. In Fitter AH, Raffaelli DG, eds, Advances in Ecological Research, Vol 30. Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, pp 299-338.
46. Fenchel T, Finlay B. 2008. Oxygen and the spatial structure of microbial communities. Biol Rev 83:553-569.
47. Gambi C, Bianchelli S, Perez M, Invers O, Ruiz JM. 2009. Biodiversity response to experimental induced hypoxic-anoxic conditions in seagrass sediments. Biodivers Conserv 18:33-54.