Gender-sensitive substance abuse treatment and arrest outcomes for women

Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 332-339

  Kissin, Wendy B ^a   Tang, Zhiqun ^a   Campbell, Kevin M ^b   Claus, Ronald E ^a   Orwin, Robert G ^a  

^a WESTAT   (United States)

^b Washington State Department of Social and Health Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Arrest; Criminal justice outcomes; Drug abuse treatment; Gender sensitive treatment; Women offenders

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; DOMESTIC VIOLENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; ENVIRONMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OFFENDER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; PUNISHMENT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; SURVIVAL; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ARREST; CRIMINAL JUSTICE OUTCOMES; DRUG ABUSE TREATMENT; GENDER-SENSITIVE TREATMENT; WOMEN OFFENDERS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CRIMINAL LAW; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROPENSITY SCORE; SEX FACTORS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 84892484046     PISSN: 07405472     EISSN: 18736483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Andrews D.A., Bonta J., Wormith J.S. The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency 2006, 52(7):7-27.
2. Ashley O.S., Marsden M.E., Brady T.M. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: A review. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 2003, 29(1):19-53.
3. Austin P.C. A critical appraisal of propensity-score matching in the medical literature between 1996 and 2003. Statistics in Medicine 2008, 27:2037-2049.
4. Austin J., Bruce M.A., Caroll L., McCall P.L., Richards S.C. The use of incarceration in the United States. Critical Criminology 2001, 10:17-41.
5. Austin P.C., Grootendorst P., Anderson G.M. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: A Monte Carlo study. Statistics in Medicine 2007, 26(4):734-753.
6. Bloom B., Owen B.A., Covington S. Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders 2003, US Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Corrections.
7. Bureau of Justice Statistics Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 2011, Section 4: Characteristics and distribution of persons arrested 2011, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
8. Bureau of Justice Statistics Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 2011, Section 6: Persons under correctional supervision 2011, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
9. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT). (2009). Substance abuse treatment: Addressing the specific needs of women. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 51. HHS Publication No. (SMA) 09-4426. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2009.
10. Claus R.E., Orwin R.G., Kissin W., Krupski A., Campbell K., Stark K. Does gender-specific substance abuse treatment for women promote continuity of care?. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2007, 32:27-39.
11. Covington S.S. Beyond trauma facilitator's guide 2003, Hazelden Publishing, Center City, MN.
12. Covington S.S. Helping women recover: A program for treating substance abuse. Facilitator's guide - revised edition for use in the criminal justice system 2008, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco, CA.
13. Covington, S. S., & Bloom, B. E. (2006). Gender-responsive treatment and services in correctional settings. Women and Therapy, Elaine Leeder (Ed.), 29(3/4), 9-33.
14. Daley M., Argeriou M., McCarty D., Callahan J.J., Shepard D.S., Williams C.N. The costs of crime and the benefits of substance abuse treatment for pregnant women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2000, 19:445-458.
15. Dowden C., Blanchette K. An evaluation of the effectiveness of substance abuse programming for female offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2002, 24(2):220-230.
16. Evans E., Li L., Pierce J., Hser Y.-I. Explaining long-term outcomes among drug-dependent mothers treated in women-only versus mixed-gender programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2013, 45:293-301.
17. Greenfield S.F., Brooks A.J., Gordon S.M., Green C.A., Kropp F., McHugh R.K., Lincoln M., Hien D., Miele G.M. Substance abuse treatment entry, retention, and outcome in women: A review of the literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2007, 86:1-21.
18. Greenfield S.F., Grella C.E. What is "women-focused" treatment for substance use disorders?. Psychiatric Services 2009, 60:880-882.
19. Grella C.E., Greenwell L. Substance abuse treatment for women: Changes in the settings where women received treatment and types of services provided, 1987-1998. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research 2004, 31(4):367-383.
20. Grella C.E. From generic to gender-responsive treatment: Changes in social policies, treatment services, and outcomes of women in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, SARC suppl. 2008, 5:327-343.
21. Grella C.E., Rodriguez L. Motivation for treatment among women offenders in prison-based treatment and longitudinal outcomes among those who participate in community aftercare. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs Suppl 2011, 7:58-67.
22. Guo S., Fraser M.W. Propensity score analysis: Statistical methods and applications 2010, Sage, Los Angeles.
23. Linacre J.M. Rasch power analysis: Size vs. significance: Standardized chi-square fit statistic. Rasch Measurement Transactions 2003, 17:918.
24. Linacre, J. M. (2010). A User's Guide to WINSTEPS® and MINISTEPS: Rasch-Model Computer Programs: Program Manual 3.70.0. Winsteps.com, Beaverton, Oregon.
25. Lynch, S. M., DeHart, D. D., Belknap, J., & Green, B. L. (2012). Women's pathways to jail: The roles & intersections of serious mental illness & trauma. Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice.
26. Mauer M., Potler C., Wolf R. Gender and justice: Women, drugs, and sentencing policy 1999, Washington, DC, The Sentencing Project.
27. Messina, N., Burdon, W., Hagopian, G., & Prendergast, M. (2006). Predictors of prison-based treatment outcomes: A comparison of men and women participants. (2006). The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 32, 7-28.
28. Messina N., Calhoun S., Warda U. Gender-responsive drug court treatment: A randomized controlled trial. Criminal Justice Behavior 2012, 39(12):1539-1558.
29. Messina N., Grella C.E., Burdon W., Prendergast M. Childhood adverse events and current traumatic distress: A comparison of men and women drug-dependent prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2007, 34:1385-1401.
30. Messina N., Grella C.E., Cartier J., Torres S. A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2010, 38:97-107.
31. Moos R.H., Moos B.S. Long-term influence of duration and intensity of treatment on previously untreated individuals with alcohol use disorders. Addiction 2003, 98:325-337.
32. Mosher C., Phillips D. The dynamics of a prison-based therapeutic community for women offenders: Retention, completion, and outcomes. The Prison Journal 2006, 86(1):6-31.
33. McDonald. D. (2008). Gender-responsive treatment and the need to examine female inmates' lives in prison and prior to prison. Corrections Compendium, 7-30.
34. Ney B., Ramirez R., Van Dieten M. Ten truths that matter when working with justice involved women. National Resource Center on Justice Involved Women. 2012, 1-18.
35. Orwin R., Francisco L., Bernichon T. Effectiveness of women's substance abuse treatment programs: A meta-analysis. National Evaluation Data Services (NEDS) Analytic Summary July, 2001, 21:1-8.
36. Orwin R.G., Sonnefeld L.J., Cordray D.S., Pion G.M., Perl H.I. Constructing quantitative implementation scales from categorical services data: An example from a multisite evaluation. Evaluation Review 1998, 22(2):245-288.
37. Pearl J. On a class of bias-amplifying variables that endanger effect estimates. Technical Report R-356. Proceedings of UAI, 417-424 2010, AUAI, Corvallis, OR. P. Grunwald, P. Spirtes (Eds.).
38. Pelissier B.M.M., Camp S.D., Gaes G.G., Saylor W.G., Rhodes W. Gender differences in outcomes from prison-based residential treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2003, 24:149-160.
39. Pelissier B., Jones N. A review of gender differences among substance abusers. Crime & Delinquency 2005, 51:343-372.
40. Pelissier B., Motivans M., Rounds-Bryant J.L. Substance abuse treatment outcomes: A multi-site study of male and female prison programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 2005, 41(2):57-80.
41. Prendergast M.L., Messina N.P., Hall E.A., Warda U.S. The relative effectiveness of women-only and mixed-gender treatment for substance-abusing women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2011, 336-348.
42. Robbins C.A., Martin S.S., Surratt H.L. Substance abuse treatment, anticipated maternal roles, and reentry success of drug-involved women prisoners. Crime & Delinquency 2009, 55(3):388-411.
43. Rosenbaum P., Rubin D.R. The central role of propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 1983, 70:41-55.
44. Rubin D.B. Estimating causal effects from large data sets using propensity scores. Annals of Internal Medicine 1997, 127:757-763.
45. Sacks J.Y., McKendrick K., Hamilton Z. A randomized clinical trial of a therapeutic community treatment for female inmates: Outcomes at 6 and 12months after prison release. Journal of Addictive Diseases 2012, 31:258-269.
46. Salisbury E.J., Van Voorhis P. Gendered pathways: A quantitative investigation of women probationers' paths to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2009, 36(6):541-566.
47. Shadish W.R., Cook T.D., Campbell D.T. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference 2002, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
48. Spjeldnes S., Goodkind S. Gender differences and offender reentry: A review of the literature. Journal of Offender-Rehabilitation 2009, 48:314-335.
49. Tang Z., Claus R.E., Orwin R.G., Kissin W.B., Arieira C. Measurement of gender-sensitive treatment for women in mixed-gender substance abuse treatment programs. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 2012, 123(103):160-166.
50. Van Voorhis P., Wright E.M., Salisbury E., Bauman A. Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2010, 37(3):261-288.
51. Van Voorhis P. On behalf of women offenders: Women's place in the science of evidence-based practice. American Society of Criminology 2012, 11(2):111-145.
52. Wells D., Bright L. Drug treatment and reentry for incarcerated women. Corrections Today Dec., 2005, 98-111.
53. Wright B.D., Linacre J.M., Gustafson J.E. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions 1994, 8:370.