On behalf of women offenders: Women's place in the science of evidence-based practice van voorhis vollmer award address

Criminology and Public Policy

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 111-145

  Voorhis, Patricia Van ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883394654     PISSN: 15386473     EISSN: 17459133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2012.00793.x     Document Type: Article

References (195)

1. American Psychological Association (APA). 2010. Amendments to the 2002 Ethical Principles of Psychology and Code of Conduct. American Psychologist, 65: 493.
2. American Psychological Association Divisions 17 and 35 (2004). Draft Guidelines for Psychological Practice with Girls and Women. Washington, D.C. : Author.
3. Andrews, Donald A. and James A. Bonta. 1995. Level of Service Inventory-Revised. North Tonawanda, NY : Multi-Health Systems.
4. Andrews, Donald A. and James A. Bonta. 2010. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct, 5th Edition. Cincinnati, OH : LexisNexis.
5. Andrews, Donald A., James A. Bonta, and Robert D. Hoge. 1990a. Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17:19-52.
6. Andrews, Donald A, James A. Bonta, and Steven Wormith. 2004. Level of Service/Case Management Inventory:LS/CMI Manual. Toronto, Ontario, Canada : Multi-Health Systems.
7. Andrews, Donald A., Craig Dowden, and Paul Gendreau. 1999. Clinically Relevant and Psychologically Informed Approaches to Reduced Re-Offending: A Meta-Analytic Study of Human Risk, Need, Responsivity, and Other Concerns in Justice Contexts. Unpublished manuscript, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
8. Andrews, Donald A., Craig Dowden, and Jill L. Rettinger. 2001. Special populations within corrections. In (John A. Winterdyck, ed.), Corrections in Canada: Social Reactions to Crime. Toronto, Ontario, Canada : Prentice-Hall.
9. Andrews, Donald A., Ivan Zinger, Robert D. Hoge, James A. Bonta, Paul Gendreau, and Francis T. Cullen. 1990b. Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28: 419-429.
10. Arnold, Regina A. 1990. Processes of victimization and criminalization of Black women. Social Justice, 17: 156-166.
11. Austin, James, Barbara Bloom, and Trish Donahue. 1992. Female Offenders in the Community: An Analysis of Innovative Strategies and Programs. San Francisco, CA : National Council on Crime and Delinquency.
12. Austin, James, Marino A. Bruce, Leo Carroll, Patricia L. McCall, and Stephen C. Richards. 2001. The use of incarceration in the United States. Critical Criminology: An International Journal, 10: 17-41.
13. Baker, Nancy L. and Janelle L. Mason. 2010. Gender issues in psychological testing of personality and abilities. In (Joan C. Chrisler and Donald R. McCreary, eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology, Volume 2. New York : Springer.
14. Belknap, Joanne. 2007. The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice, 3rd Edition. Belmont, CA : Thompson Wadsworth.
15. Belknap, Joanne and Kristi Holsinger. 2006. The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1: 48-71.
16. Bell, Valerie. 2012. Gender-Responsive Risk/Needs Assessment: A Comparison of Women and Men. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
17. Blanchette, Kelly. 2009. Consensus Knowledge Statement and Relevant Research, Technical Assistance Report. Washington, D.C. : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
18. Blanchette, Kelly and Shelley L. Brown. 2006. The Assessment and Treatment of Women Offenders: An Integrated Perspective. Chichester, U.K. : Wiley.
19. Bloom, Barbara. 1996. Triple Jeopardy: Race, Class and Gender as Factors in Women's Imprisonment. Riverside : University of California.
20. Bloom, Barbara, Barbara Owen, and Stephanie Covington. 2003. Gender-Responsive Strategies: Research Practice and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
21. Bonta, James A. 1995. The responsivity principle and offender rehabilitation. Forum on Corrections Research, 7: 34-37.
22. Bonta, James A., Brad Bogue, M. Crowley, and Laurence Motiuk. 2001. Implementing offender classification systems: Lessons learned. In (Gary Bernfeld, David Farrington, and Alan Leschied, eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice: Implementing and Evaluating Effective Programs. Chichester, U.K. : Wiley.
23. Brennan, Tim. 1998. Institutional classification of females: Problems and some proposals for reform. In (Ruth T. Zaplin, ed.), Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Gaithersburg, MD : Aspen.
24. Brennan, Tim, William Dieterich, Beate Ehret, Markus Breitenback, Sabrina Arredondo Matson, and Brian Matson. 2008. Risk and Need Assessment of Women Offenders in California Prisons: An Evaluation of COMPAS Reentry and NIC's Gender Responsive Approach. Sacramento : California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
25. Brennan, Tim, William Dieterich, and William L. Oliver. 2006. COMPAS: Technical Manual and Psychometric Report Version 5.0. Traverse City, MI : NorthpointeInstitute.
26. Bridgeman, Brent and Cathy Wendler. 1991. Gender differences in predictors of college mathematics performance and in college mathematics course grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83: 275-284.
27. Brushette, Rachel, Patricia Van Voorhis, and Ashley Bauman. 2011. Validation of the Women's Risk/Needs Assessment (WRNA) in a Pretrial Setting. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC.
28. Buell, Maureen, Phyllis Modley, and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2011. Policy developments in the U.S. In (Rosemary Sheehan, Gill McIvor, and Chris Trotter, eds.), Working with Women Offenders in the Community. Devon, U.K. : Willan.
29. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 1999. Special Report: Women Offenders. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice.
30. Bush, Jack and Brian Bilodeau. 1993. OPTIONS: A Cognitive Change Program. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
31. Bush, Jack, Juliana Taymans, and Barry Glick. 1998. Thinking for a Change. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
32. Butler, Burke and Rebecca Engle. 2011. ABA Corrections Committee: Report onGender Responsive Classification Committee. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
33. Center for Effective Public Policy. 2010. Gender-Informed Practice Assessment (GIPA). Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
34. Chen, Wan, Susan Woods, and Kathleen Puntillo. 2005. Gender differences in symptoms associated with acute myocardial infarction: A review of the research. Heart Lung, 34: 240-247.
35. Chesney-Lind, Meda. 1997. The Female Offender: Girls, Women, and Crime. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
36. Chesney-Lind, Meda. 2000. What to do about girls? Thinking about programs for young women. In (Maeve W. McMahon, ed.), Assessment to Assistance: Programs for Women in Community Corrections. Lanham, MD : American Correctional Association.
37. Chesney-Lind, Meda. 2012. Campus crime beat: The challenges of doing feminist criminology in the academy. Women & Criminal Justice, 22: 1-14.
38. Chesney-Lind, Meda and Noelie Rodrigues. 1983. Women under lock and key. The Prison Journal, 63: 47-65.
39. Chesney-Lind, Meda and Randall G. Shelden. 1992. Girls, Delinquency, and Juvenile Justice. Belmont, CA : Thompson Wadsworth.
40. Cicero, June H. and Elaine T. DeCostanzo. 2000. Sentencing Women Offenders: A Training Curriculum for Judges. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections and National Association for Women Judges.
41. Clark, Mary Jo and Jerilee Gandy. 1984. Sex Differences in the Academic Performance of Scholastic Aptitude Test Takers. College Board Rep. No. 84-8 Educational Testing Science Research Rep. No. 84-43. New York : College Entrance Examination Board.
42. Coulson, Grant, Giorgio Ilacqua, Verna Nutbrown, Diana Giulekas, and Francis Cudjoe. 1996. Predictive utility of the LSI for incarcerated female offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23: 427-439.
43. Covington, Stephanie. 1998. The relational theory of women's psychological development: Implications for the criminal justice system. In (Ruth T. Zaplin, ed.), Female Offenders: Critical Perspectives and Effective Interventions. Gaithersburg, MD : Aspen.
44. Covington, Stephanie. 2003. Beyond Trauma: A Healing Journey for Women. Center City, MN : Change Companies.
45. Covington, Stephanie. 2008. Helping Women Recover: A Program for Treating Substance Abuse. Facilitator's Guide-Revised Edition for Use in the Criminal Justice System. San Francisco, CA : Jossey-Bass.
46. Covington, Stephanie, Cynthia Burke, Sandy Keaton, and Candice Norcott. 2008. Evaluation of a trauma-informed and gender-responsive intervention for women in drug treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, Suppl. 5: 387-398.
47. Cullen, Francis T. 2005. The twelve people who saved rehabilitation: How the science of criminology made a difference: The American Society of Criminology 2004 Presidential Address. Criminology, 43: 1-42.
48. Cullen, Francis T. and Paul Gendreau. 2001. From nothing works to what works: Changing professional ideology in the 21st century. Crime & Delinquency, 81: 313-338.
49. Cullen, Francis T., Paula Smith, Christopher T. Lowenkamp, and Edward Latessa. 2009. Nothing works revisited: Deconstructing Farabee's "rethinking rehabilitation." Victims & Offenders, 4: 101-123.
50. Daly, Kathleen. 1992. Women's pathways to felony court: Feminist theories of law breaking and problems of representation. Southern California Review of Law and Women's Studies, 2: 11-52.
51. Daly, Kathleen. 1994. Gender, Crime and Punishment: Is Justice Blind or are Men and Women Treated Differently by the Courts? New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.
52. Dey, S., M. Flather, G. Devlin, D. Brieger, E. Gurfinkel, P. Steg, et al. 2008. Sex-related differences in the presentation, treatment and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart, 95: 20-26.
53. Dimeff, Linda A., Kelly Koerner, and Marsha M. Linehan. 2002. Summary of Research on Dialectical Behavior Therapy. Seattle, WA : Behavioral Tech.
54. Dowden, Craig and Don A. Andrews. 1999. What works for female offenders. A meta-analytic review. Crime & Delinquency, 45: 435-452.
55. Education Development Center, Inc., Center for Equity and Cultural Diversity. 1993. A Guide to Programming for Women in Prison. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
56. Farabee, David. 2005. Rethinking Rehabilitation: Why We Can't Reform Our Criminals? Washington, DC : AEI Press.
57. Farr, Kathryn A. 2000. Classification of female inmates: Moving forward. Crime & Delinquency, 46: 3-17.
58. Flynn, Edith E. 1971. The Special Problems of Female Prisoners. Paper presented at the National Conference on Corrections, Williamsburg, VA.
59. Funk, Stephanie J. 1999. Risk assessment for juveniles on probation: A focus on gender. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26: 44-68.
60. Gaes, Gerald, Timothy Flanagan, Lawrence Motiuk, and Lynn Stewart. 1999. Adultcorrectional treatment. In (Michael H. Tonry and Joan Petersilia, eds.), Prisons, Crime and Justice: A Review, Volume 26. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
61. Gehring, Krista. 2011. Are Needs Related to Pretrial Outcomes? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
62. Gehring, Krista S., Patricia Van Voorhis, and Valerie R. Bell. 2010. "What Works" for female probationers? An evaluation of the Moving On Program. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 11: 1, 6-10.
63. Geller, Stacie E., Marci Goldstein Adams, and Molly Carnes. 2006. Adherence to federal guidelines for reporting of sex and race/ethnicity in clinical trials. Journal of Women's Health, 15: 1123-1131.
64. Gendreau, Paul. 1996. The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In (Alan T. Harland, ed.), Choosing Correctional Options that Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
65. Gendreau, Paul, Claire Goggin, and Francis T. Cullen. 1999. The Effects of Prison Sentences on Recidivism. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada : Public Works and Government Services.
66. Gendreau, Paul, Claire Goggin, Francis T. Cullen, and Mario Paparozzi. 2002a. The common-sense revolution and correctional policy. In (James Maguire, ed.), Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment: Effective Programs and Policies to Reduce Re-Offending. Chichester, U.K. : Wiley.
67. Gendreau, Paul, Claire Goggin, and Paula Smith. 2001. Implementation guidelinesfor correctional programs in the "real world." In (Gary A. Bernfeld, David P. Farrington, and Alan W. Leschied, eds.), Offender Rehabilitation in Practice. West Sussex, U.K. : Wiley.
68. Gendreau, Paul, Claire Goggin, and Paula Smith. 2002b. Is the PCL-R really the "unparalleled measure of offender risk?" A lesson in knowledge cumulation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29: 397-426.
69. Gendreau, Paul, Tracey Little, and Claire Goggin. 1996. A meta-analysis of the predictors of adult offender recidivism: What works Criminology, 34: 575-607.
70. Gilfus, Mary E. 1992. From victims to survivors to offenders. Women's routes of entry and immersion into street crime. Women and Criminal Justice, 4: 63-90.
71. Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
72. Girls Incorporated. 1996. Prevention and Parity: Girls in Juvenile Justice. Indianapolis, IN : Girls Incorporated National Resource Center.
73. Glass, Gene V., Barry McGaw, Mary Lee Smith. 1981. Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
74. Glick, Ruth and Virginia Neto. 1977. A National Study of Women's Correctional Programs. Washington, DC : U.S. Government Printing Office.
75. Goldenberg, Marvin M. 2003. Politics and clinical trials: The inclusion of women. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 28: 791-796.
76. Goldstein, Arnold P., Barry Glick, and John C. Gibbs. 1998.Aggression Replacement Training: A Comprehensive Intervention for Aggressive Youth, Revised Edition. Champaign, IL : Research Press.
77. Grella, Christine. 2009. Female Offender Treatment and Employment Project (FOTEP). Summary of Evaluation Findings. Los Angeles, CA : UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs.
78. Guerino, Paul, Paige Harrison, and William Sabol. 2011. Prisoners in 2010. Washington, DC : Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
79. Hall, Elizabeth, Michael Prendergast, Jean Wellish, Meredith Patten, and Yan Cao. 2004. Treating drug abusing women prisoners: An outcomes evaluation of the Forever Free Program. The Prison Journal, 84: 81-105.
80. Hannah-Moffat, Kelly. 2004. Gendering risk: At what cost? Negotiations of gender and risk in Canadian women's prisons. Feminism and Psychology, 14: 243-249.
81. Hannah-Moffat, Kelly. 2009. Gridlock or mutability: Reconsidering gender and riskassessment. Criminology & Public Policy, 8: 209-219.
82. Hannah-Moffat, Kelly and Margaret Shaw. 2000. Thinking about cognitive skills? Think again Criminal Justice Matters, 39: 8-9.
83. Hardyman, Patricia L. and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2004. Developing Gender-Specific Classification Systems for Women Offenders. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
84. Heilbrun, Kirk, David Dematteo, Ralph Fretz, Jacey Erickson, Kento Yasuhara, and Natalie Anumba. 2008. How "specific" are gender-specific rehabilitation needs? An empirical analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35: 1382-1397.
85. Hesse-Biber, Sharlene Nagy, and Michelle L. Yaiser. 2004. Feminist approaches to research as a process: Reconceptualizing epistemology, methodology, and method. In (Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber and Michelle L. Yaiser, eds.), Feminist Perspectives on Social Research. New York : Oxford University Press.
86. Holsinger, Alexander, Christopher Lowenkamp, and Edward Latessa. 2003. Ethnicity, gender and the LSI-R. Journal of Criminal Justice, 31: 309-320.
87. Holsinger, Kristi. 2000. Feminist perspectives on female offending: Examining realgirls' lives. Women & Criminal Justice, 12: 23-51.
88. Holsinger, Kristi and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2005. Examining gender inequities in classification systems: Missouri's development of a gender-responsive assessment instrument. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 6: 33-34, 44-47.
89. Holtfreter, Kristy and Merry Morash. 2003. The needs of women offenders: Implications for correctional programming. Women & Criminal Justice, 14: 137-160.
90. Holtfreter, Kristy, Michael D. Reisig, and Merry Morash. 2004. Poverty, state capital, and recidivism among women offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 3: 185-208.
91. Holverstott, Katherine M., Kristal E. Ehrhardt, Trisha Parish, Ruth Ervin, Lanai Jennings, and Alan Poling. 2002. Females and males as participants in school psychology research: Data from four journals over 15 years. School Psychology International, 23: 449-457.
92. House, J. Daniel, Suman Gupta, and Beiling Xiao. 1997. Gender Differences in Prediction of Grade Performance from Graduate Record Examination Scores. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Illinois Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.
93. Hubbard, Dana and Betsy Matthews. 2008. Reconciling the differences between "Gender-Responsive" and the "What Works" literatures to improve services for girls. Crime and Delinquency, 54: 225-258.
94. Hubbard, Dana and Travis Pratt. 2002. A meta analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 34: 1-13.
95. Hyde, Janet S. 1990. Analysis and the psychology of gender differences. Signs, 16: 53-73.
96. Hyde, Janet S. 2006. Half the Human Experience. Boston, MA : Houghton Mifflin.
97. Jarema, Kimberly, Susan Snycerski, Susan Bagge, John Austin, and Alan Poling. 1999. Participation of women as authors and participants in articles published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 19: 85-94.
98. Jones, Natalie. 2011. Merging Theoretical Frameworks to Inform Risk Assessment for the Young Female Offender. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
99. Keiser, Jocelyn. 2005. Gender in the pharmacy: Does it matter Science, 308: 1572.
100. Kendall, Kathleen. 2004. Dangerous thinking: A critical history of correctional cognitive behaviorism. In (George Mair, ed.), What Matters in Probation. Devon, U.K. : Willan.
101. Killien, Marcia, Judy Ann Bigby, Victoria Champion, Emma Fernandex-Repollet, Rebecca D. Jackson, Marjorie Kagawa-Singer, et al. 2000. Involving minority and underrepresented women in clinical trials: The National Centers of Excellence in Women's Health. Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 9: 1061-1070.
102. Kohlberg, Lawrence, Ann Colby, John Gibbs, Betsy Speicher-Dubin, and Dan Candee. 1979. Standard Form Scoring Manual. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
103. Kroner, Daryl and Jeremy Mills. 2001. The accuracy of five risk appraisal instruments in predicting institutional misconduct and new convictions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28: 471-489.
104. Langan, Patrick A. and David J. Levin. 2002. Recidivism of prisoners released in 1994. Washington, DC : Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.
105. Langan, Patrick A. and Bernadette Pelissier. 2001. Gender differences among prisoners in drug treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13: 291-301.
106. Latessa, Edward J., Francis T. Cullen, and Paul Gendreau. 2002. Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment. Federal Probation, 66: 43-49.
107. Latessa, Edward J., Paula Smith, Richard Lemke, Matthew Makarios, and Christopher Lowenkamp. 2009. Creation and validation of the Ohio Risk Assessment System: Final Report. Cincinnati, OH : University of Cincinnati Center for Criminal Justice Research.
108. Leonard, David K. and Jiming Jiang. 1999. Gender bias and the college predictions of the SATs: A cry of despair. Research in Higher Education, 40: 375-407.
109. Levrant, Ronald and Louise Silverstein. 2005. Gender is neglected by both evidence-based practices and therapy as usual. In (John Norcross, Larry Beutler, and Ronald Levant, eds.), Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health: Debate and Dialogue on Fundamental Questions. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
110. Lewin, Miriam and Cheryl L. Wild. 1991. The impact of the feminist critique on tests, assessment, and methodology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15: 581-596.
111. Linehan, Marsha. 1993. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Borderline Personality Disorder. New York : Guilford Press.
112. Lipsey, Mark W. 1992. Juvenile delinquency treatment: A meta-analytic inquiry into the variability of effects. In (Thomas D. Cook, Harris Cooper, David J. Cordray, Heidi Hartmann, Larry V. Hedges, Richard J. Light, et al., eds.), Meta-Analysis for Explanation. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
113. Lipsey, Mark W. 2009. The primary factors that characterize effective interventions with juvenile offenders: A meta analytic overview. Victims & Offenders, 4: 124-147.
114. Lipsey, Mark and David Wilson. 1993. The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48: 1189-1209.
115. Logan, Charles and Gerald Gaes. 1993. Meta-analysis and the rehabilitation of punishment. Justice Quarterly, 10: 245-263.
116. Lovins, Lori Brusman, Christopher Lowenkamp, Edward J. Latessa, and Paula Smith. 2007. Application of the risk principle to female offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminology, 23: 383-393.
117. Lowenkamp, Christopher T. 2004. A Program-Level Analysis of the Relationship Between Correctional Program Integrity and Treatment Effectiveness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
118. Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Alexander M. Holsinger, and Edward J. Latessa. 2001. Risk/need assessment, offender classification, and the role of childhood Abuse. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 28: 543-563.
119. Lowenkamp, Christopher T. and Edward J. Latessa. 2002. Evaluation of Ohio's Community-Based Correctional Facilities and Halfway House Programs. Cincinnati, OH : University of Cincinnati.
120. Lowenkamp, Christopher T., Edward J. Latessa, and Paula Smith. 2006. Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5: 575-594.
121. MacKenzie, Doris L. 2000. Evidence-based corrections: Identifying what works. Crime & Delinquency, 46: 457-471.
122. MacKenzie, Doris L., David B. Wilson, and Suzanne B. Kider. 2001. Effects of correctional boot camps on offending. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578: 126-143.
123. Manchak, Sarah, Jennifer Skeem, Kevin Douglas, and Mario Siranosian. 2009. Does gender moderate the predictive utility of the Level of Service Inventory-Revised (LSI-R) for serious violent offenders Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36: 425-442.
124. Martinson, Robert. 1974. What works?: Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35: 22-54.
125. Mauer, Marc, Cathy Potler, and Richard Wolf. 1999. Gender and Justice: Women, Drugs and Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC : The Sentencing Project.
126. McClellan, Dorothy, David Farabee, and Benjamin Crouch. 1997. Early victimization, drug use, and criminality: A comparison of male and female prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24: 455-476.
127. McConnell, Beth A. 1996. The Prediction of Female Offender Recidivism with the Level of Supervision Inventory. Unpublished honor's thesis, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
128. Messina, Nina, Christine Grella, William Burdon, and Michael Prendergast. 2007. Childhood adverse events and current traumatic distress: A comparison of men and women drug-dependent prisoners. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34: 1385-1401.
129. Messina, Nina, Christine Grella, Jerry Cartier, and Stephanie Torres. 2010. A randomized experimental study of gender-responsive substance abuse treatment for women in prison. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 38: 97-107.
130. Mihailides, Stephen, Belinda Jude, and Eric Van denBosshe. 2005. The LSI-R in an Australian setting: Implications for risk/needs decision making in forensic contexts. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12: 207-217.
131. Morash, Merry. 2010. Women on Probation and Parole. Boston, MA : Northeastern University Press.
132. Morash, Merry, Timothy S. Bynum, and Barbara A. Koons. 1998. Women Offenders: Programming Needs and Promising Approaches. Washington, DC : National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
133. Najavits, Lisa M. 2002. Seeking Safety: A Treatment Manual for PTSD and Substance Abuse. New York : Guilford Press.
134. Najavits, Lisa M., Robert J. Gallop, and Roger D. Weiss. 2006. Seeking Safety therapy for adolescent girls with PTSD and substance abuse: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 33: 453-463.
135. Najavits, Lisa M., Roger D. Weiss, Sarah R. Shaw, and Larry R. Muenz. 1998. "Seeking Safety": Outcomes of a new cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for women with posttraumatic stress disorder and substance dependence. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11: 437-456.
136. National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC). 2008. Report of the Commission on the Use of Standardized Tests in Undergraduate Admission. Arlington, VA : Author.
137. National Institutes of Health (NIH). 1999. Agenda for Research on Women's Health in the 21st Century. Rockville, MD : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
138. Olds, David, JoAnn Robinson, Lisa Pettitt, Dennis W. Luckey, John Holmberg, Rosanna K. Ng, et al. 2004. Effects of home visits by paraprofessionals and by nurses: Age 4 follow-up results of a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 114: 1560-1568.
139. Orbis Partners, Inc. 2010. Women Offender Case Management Model: The Connecticut Project. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
140. Owen, Barbara. 1998. In the Mix: Struggle and Survival in a Women's Prison. Albany : State University of New York Press.
141. Palmer, Emma and Clive Hollin. 2007. The Level of Service Inventory-Revised with English women prisoners: A needs and reconviction analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34: 1385-1401.
142. Petersilia, Joan. 2008. Influencing public policy: An embedded criminologist reflects on California prison reform. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4: 335-356.
143. Pew Center on the States. 2010. Prison Count 2010. Washington, DC : Author.
144. Piquero, Alex, David Farrington, Brandon Welsh, Richard Tremblay, and Wesley Jennings. 2009. Effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5: 83-120.
145. Poling, Alan, Amy Durgin, Kelly P. Bradley, Lindsay K. Porter, Karen Van Wagner, Marc Weeden, et al. 2009. Female's participation in psychopharmacology research as authors, editors, and subjects. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17: 105-112.
146. Porter, Carl L., LeeAnn Christian, and Alan Poling. 2003. Research brief: Some data concerning the reporting of participant's gender in the mental retardation literature. Mental Retardation, 41: 75-77.
147. Prendergast, Michael, Jean Wellisch, and Gregory Falkin. 1995. Assessment of services for substance-abusing women offenders and correctional settings. The Prison Journal, 75: 240-256.
148. Prendergast, Michael, Elizabeth Hall, and Jean Wellisch. 2002. Outcome Evaluation of the Forever Free Substance Abuse Treatment Program: One-year Post-Release Outcomes. Washington, D.C. : National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
149. President's Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice. 1967. The Challenge of Crime in a Free Society. Washington, DC : U.S. Department of Justice.
150. Raeder, Myrna. 2012. Legal Implications for Managing Justice-Involved Women. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
151. Ramasubbu, Kumudha, Hitinder Gurm, and David Litaker. 2001. Gender bias in clinical trials? Do double standards still apply Journal of Women's Health and Gender-Based Medicine, 10: 757-764.
152. Rathore, Saif S., Yongfei Wang, and Harlan M. Krumholtz. 2002. Sex-based differences in the effect of digoxin for the treatment of heart failure. New England Journal of Medicine, 347: 1403-1411.
153. Raynor, Peter. 2007. Risk and need assessment in British probation: The contribution of the LSI-R. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13: 125-138.
154. Reisig, Michael D., Kristry Holtfreter, and Merry Morash. 2006. Assessing recidivism risk across female pathways to crime. Justice Quarterly, 23:384-405.
155. Rettinger, Jill L. 1998. A Recidivism Follow-Up Study Investigating Risk and Need Within a Sample of Provincially Sentenced Women. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
156. Richie, Beth E. 1996. Compelled to Crime: The Gendered Entrapment of Battered Black Women. New York : Routledge.
157. Ridker, Paul M., Nancy R. Cook, I-Min Lee, David Gordon, J. Michael Gaziano, JoAnn E. Manson, et al. 2005. A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. New England Journal of Medicine, 352: 1293-1304.
158. Ross, Robert R. and Elizabeth A. Fabiano. 1985. Time to Think: A Cognitive Model of Delinquency Prevention and Offender Rehabilitation. Johnson City, TN : Institute of Social Science and Arts.
159. Salisbury, Emily J. and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2009. Gendered pathways: An empirical investigation of women probationers' path to incarceration. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36: 541-566.
160. Salisbury, Emily, Patricia Van Voorhis, and Georgia Spiropoulis. 2009a. The predictive validity of a gender responsive risk/needs assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 55: 550-585.
161. Salisbury, Emily, Patricia Van Voorhis, Emily M. Wright, and Ashley Bauman. 2009b. Changing the probation experience for women offenders: Findings from the Women's Needs and Risk Assessment Project. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 10: 83-84, 92-95.
162. Schram, Pamela J. and Merry Morash. 2002. Evaluation of a life skills program for women inmates in Michigan. Journal Offender Rehabilitation, 34:47-70.
163. Seligman, Martin E. P. 2002. Authentic Happiness: Using the New Positive Psychology to Realize your Potential for Lasting Fulfillment. New York : Free Press.
164. Silverstein, Andrea L. 2000. Standardized tests: The continuation of gender bias inhigher education. Hofstra Law Review, 29:669-700.
165. Simourd, Linda and Don A. Andrews. 1994. Correlates of delinquency: A look at gender differences. Forum on Corrections Research, 6: 26-31.
166. Smart, Carol. 1976. Women, Crime, and Criminology: A Feminist Critique. London : Routledge and Kegan Paul.
167. Smart, Carol. 1982. The new female offender: Reality or myth? In (Barbara Price and Natalie Sokoloff, eds.), The Criminal Justice System and Women. New York : Clark Boardman.
168. Smith, Mary L. 1980. Publication bias and meta analysis. Evaluation in Education, 4: 22-24.
169. Smith, Paula, Francis T. Cullen, and Edward J. Latessa. 2009. Can 14, 737 women be wrong? A meta analysis of the LSI-R and recidivism for female offenders. Criminology & Public Policy, 8: 183-208.
170. Sorbello, Laura, Lynne Eccleston, Tony Ward, and Robin Jones. 2002. Treatment needs of female offenders: A review. Australian Psychologist, 37: 198-205.
171. Sternberg, Robert and Wendy Williams, 1997. Does the Graduate Record Examination predict meaningful success in the graduate training of psychologists. American Psychologist, 52: 630-641.
172. Sue, Stanley and Nolan Zane. 2005. Ethnic minority populations have been neglected by evidence-based practices. In (John Norcross, Larry Beutler, and Ronald Levant, eds.), Evidence Based Practices in Mental Health: Debate and Dialogue on Fundamental Questions. Washington, DC : American Psychological Association.
173. Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures, Division of Clinical Psychology of the American Psychological Association. 1995. Training and dissemination of empirically validated psychological treatment: Report and recommendation. The Clinical Psychologist, 48: 3-23.
174. Tavris, Carol. 1992. The Mismeasure of Woman. New York : Simon & Schuster.
175. Taxman, Faye S. and Jeffrey A. Bouffard. 2002. Assessing therapeutic integrity in modified therapeutic communities for drug-involved offenders. The Prison Journal, 82: 189-212.
176. Taylor, Jill McClean, Carol Gilligan, and Amy Sullivan. 1995. Between Voice and Silence: Women and Girls, Race and Relationship. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
177. Taymans, Juliana and Steve Parese. 1998. Problem Solving Skills for Offenders: A Social Cognitive Intervention. Washington, DC : George Washington University Press.
178. U.S. Government and Accounting Office (GAO). 1979. Female offenders-Who are they and what are the problems confronting them? NCJ 060496. Washington, DC : Author.
179. U.S. Surgeon General. 2001. Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity-A Supplement to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
180. Van Dieten, Marilyn. 2008. Women Offender Case Management Model. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
181. Van Dieten, Marilyn. 2011. From zero sum to win-win: How research on women advances our work in corrections. Plenary address to the International Community Corrections Association, Cincinnati, OH.
182. Van Dieten, Marilyn and Patricia MacKenna. 2001. Moving On Facilitator's Guide. Toronto, Ontario, Canada : Orbis Partners.
183. Van Voorhis, Patricia. 2009. Next steps in gender-responsive classification. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 10: 81-88.
184. Van Voorhis, Patricia. 2011. Validation of the Women's Risk/Needs Assessment (WRNA) in a Large Prison System. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC.
185. Van Voorhis, Patricia, Ashley Bauman, Emily M. Wright, and Emily Salisbury. 2009. Implementing the Women's Risk/Needs Assessment (WRNAs): Early lessons from the field. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 10: 81, 82: 89-91.
186. Van Voorhis, Patricia, Francis Cullen, and Brandon Applegate. 1995. Evaluating interventions with violent offenders: A guide for practitioners and policymakers. Federal Probation, 59: 1-11.
187. Van Voorhis, Patricia and Brittany Groot. 2010. Predictive Validity of Women's COMPAS Scales Among Incarcerated Women in California-Final Report. Cincinnati, OH : Center for Criminal Justice Research.
188. Van Voorhis, Patricia and Lois Presser. 2001. Classification of Women Offenders: A National Assessment of Current Practices. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
189. Van Voorhis, Patricia, Emily Salisbury, Emily M. Wright, and Ashley Bauman. 2008. Achieving Accurate Pictures of Risk and Identifying Gender Responsive Needs. Washington, DC : National Institute of Corrections, U.S. Department of Justice.
190. Van Voorhis, Patricia, Emily M. Wright, Emily Salisbury, and Ashley Bauman. 2010. Women's risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34: 261-288.
191. Van Wormer, Katherine. 2001. Counseling Female Offenders and Victims: A Strengths-Restorative Approach. New York : Springer.
192. Vidaver, Regina M., Bonnie Lafleur, Cynthia Tong, Robynne Bradshaw, and Sherry A. Marts. 2000. Women subjects in NIH-funded clinical research literature: Lack of progress in both representation and analysis by sex. Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine, 9: 495-504.
193. Wainer, Howard and Linda S. Steinberg. 1992. Sex differences in performance on the mathematics section of the scholastic aptitude test: A bidirectional validity study. Harvard Educational Review, 62: 323-336.
194. Wright, Emily M., Emily Salisbury, and Patricia Van Voorhis. 2007. Predicting the prison misconducts of women offenders: The importance of gender responsive needs. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23: 310-340.
195. Wright, Emily M., Patricia Van Voorhis, Emily Salisbury, and Ashley Bauman. 2009. Gender-responsive prisons: Lessons from the NIC/UC Gender-Responsive Classification Project. Women, Girls, and Criminal Justice, 10: 85-87, 95-96.