Down-regulation of acetolactate synthase compromises Ol-1- mediated resistance to powdery mildew in tomato

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Gao, Dongli ^a   Huibers, Robin P ^a,b   Loonen, Annelies E H M ^a   Visser, Richard G F ^a   Wolters, Anne Marie A ^a   Bai, Yuling ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b ENZA ZADEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Acetolactate synthase; Amino acid homeostasis; Oidium neolycopersici; Resistance; Solanum lycoperisum

Indexed keywords

ERYSIPHALES; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; OIDIUM NEOLYCOPERSICI; SOLANUM;

ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE;

ARTICLE; ASCOMYCETES; DISEASE RESISTANCE; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MICROBIOLOGY; PATHOGENICITY; PLANT DISEASE; TOMATO;

ACETOLACTATE SYNTHASE; ASCOMYCOTA; DISEASE RESISTANCE; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PLANT DISEASES;

EID: 84892449545     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-32     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Jones JDG, Dangl JL. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444(7117):323. 10.1038/nature05286, 17108957.
2. Schwessinger B, Zipfel C. News from the frontline: recent insights into PAMP-triggered immunity in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2008, 11(4):389. 10.1016/j.pbi.2008.06.001, 18602859.
3. Stotz H, Waller F, Wang K. Innate immunity in plants: the role of antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrobial Peptides and Innate Immunity, Progress in inflammation research 2013, 29-51. Springer Basel, Hiemstra PS, Zaat SAJ.
4. Bari R, Jones JDG. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol 2009, 69(4):473. 10.1007/s11103-008-9435-0, 19083153.
5. Zeier J. New insights into the regulation of plant immunity by amino acid metabolic pathways. Plant Cell and Environment 2013, doi:10.1111/pce.12122.
6. Sønderby IE, Geu-Flores F, Halkier BA. Biosynthesis of glucosinolates-gene discovery and beyond. Trends Plant Sci 2010, 15(5):283. 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.02.005, 20303821.
7. Liu S, Kandoth PK, Warren SD, Yeckel G, Heinz R, Alden J, Yang C, Jamai A, El-Mellouki T, Juvale PS, et al. A soybean cyst nematode resistance gene points to a new mechanism of plant resistance to pathogens. Nature 2012, 492(7428):256. 10.1038/nature11651, 23235880.
8. Hwang IS, An SH, Hwang BK. Pepper asparagine synthetase 1 (CaAS1) is required for plant nitrogen assimilation and defense responses to microbial pathogens. Plant J 2011, 67(5):749-762. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04622.x, 21535260.
9. Van Damme M, Zeilmaker T, Elberse J, Andel A, de Sain-van der Velden M, van den Ackerveken G. Downy mildew resistance in Arabidopsis by mutation of HOMOSERINE KINASE. Plant Cell 2009, 21(7):2179. 10.1105/tpc.109.066811, 2729605, 19622802.
10. Huibers RP, Loonen AEHM, Gao D, Van den Ackerveken G, Visser RGF, Bai Y. Powdery mildew resistance in tomato by impairment of SlPMR4 and SlDMR1. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e67467. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067467, 3688610, 23818978.
11. Stuttmann J, Hubberten H-M, Rietz S, Kaur J, Muskett P, Guerois R, Bednarek P, Hoefgen R, Parker JE. Perturbation of Arabidopsis amino acid metabolism causes incompatibility with the adapted biotrophic pathogen Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Plant Cell 2011, 23(7):2788-2803. 10.1105/tpc.111.087684, 3226217, 21784950.
12. Liu G, Ji Y, Bhuiyan NH, Pilot G, Selvaraj G, Zou J, Wei Y. Amino acid homeostasis modulates salicylic acid-associated redox status and defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2010, 22(11):3845. 10.1105/tpc.110.079392, 3015111, 21097712.
13. Whipps J, Budge S, Fenlon J. Characteristics and host range of tomato powdery mildew. Plant Pathology 1998, 47(1):36.
14. Bai Y, Huang C-C, van der Hulst R, Meijer-Dekens F, Bonnema G, Lindhout P. QTLs for tomato powdery mildew resistance (Oidium lycopersici) in Lycopersicon parviflorum G1. 1601 co-localize with two qualitative powdery mildew resistance genes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2003, 16(2):169-176. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.2.169, 12575751.
15. Bai Y, van der Hulst R, Bonnema G, Marcel TC, Meijer-Dekens F, Niks RE, Lindhout P. Tomato Defense to Oidium neolycopersici: Dominant Ol Genes Confer Isolate-Dependent Resistance Via a Different Mechanism Than Recessive ol-2. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2005, 18(4):354-362. 10.1094/MPMI-18-0354, 15828687.
16. Lindhout P, Beek Van Der H, Pet G. Wild Lycopersicon species as sources for resistance to powdery mildew (Oidium lycopersicum): mapping of the resistance gene Ol-1 on chromosome 6 of L. hirsutum. Acta Horticulturae (ISHS) 1994, 376:387-394.
17. Li C, Bonnema G, Che D, Dong L, Lindhout P, Visser R, Bai Y. Biochemical and molecular mechanisms involved in monogenic resistance responses to tomato powdery mildew. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2007, 20(9):1161. 10.1094/MPMI-20-9-1161, 17849718.
18. Huang C-C, Hoefs Van De Putte PM, GHaanstra Van Der Meer J, Meijer-Dekens F, Lindhout P. Characterization and mapping of resistance to Oidium lycopersicum in two Lycopersicon hirsutum accessions: evidence for close linkage of two Ol-genes on chromosome 6 of tomato. Heredity 2000, 85(6):511-520. 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00770.x, 11240617.
19. Seifi A. Characterization of tomato genes for resistance to Oidium neolycopersici. PhD thesis 2011, The Netherlands: Plant Breeding Department, Wageningen University.
20. Seifi A, Kaloshian I, Vossen J, Che D, Bhattarai KK, Fan J, Naher Z, Goverse A, Tjallingii WF, Lindhout P. Linked, if not the same, Mi-1 homologues confer resistance to tomato powdery mildew and root-knot nematodes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 2011, 24(4):441-450. 10.1094/MPMI-06-10-0145, 21171892.
21. Li C, Bai Y, Jacobsen E, Visser R, Lindhout P, Bonnema G. Tomato defense to the powdery mildew fungus: differences in expression of genes in susceptible, monogenic-and polygenic resistance responses are mainly in timing. Plant Mol Biol 2006, 62(1-2):127.
22. Pei D, Ma H, Zhang Y, Ma Y, Wang W, Geng H, Wu J, Li C. Virus-induced gene silencing of a putative glutathione S-transferase gene compromised Ol-1-mediated resistance against powdery mildew in tomato. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2011, 29(4):972-978.
23. Duggleby RG, Pang SS. Acetohydroxyacid synthase. J Biochem Mol Biol 2000, 33(1):1.
24. McCourt J, Duggleby R. Acetohydroxyacid synthase and its role in the biosynthetic pathway for branched-chain amino acids. Amino Acids 2006, 31(2):173. 10.1007/s00726-005-0297-3, 16699828.
25. Duggleby RG, McCourt JA, Guddat LW. Structure and mechanism of inhibition of plant acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol Biochem 2008, 46(3):309. 10.1016/j.plaphy.2007.12.004, 18234503.
26. Tomato Functional Genomics Database http://ted.bti.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/TFGD/digital/home.cgi.
27. Binder S. Branched-chain amino acid metabolism in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Arabidopsis Book 2010, e0137.
28. Chen H, Saksa K, Zhao F, Qiu J, Xiong L. Genetic analysis of pathway regulation for enhancing branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis in plants. Plant J 2010, 63(4):573. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04261.x, 20497381.
29. Chaleff RS, Bascomb NF, Chaleff RS, Bascomb NF. Genetic and biochemical evidence for multiple forms of acetolactate synthase in Nicotiana tabacum. Mol Gen Genet 1987, 210(1):33-38.
30. Scheel D, Casida JE. Sulfonylurea herbicides: Growth inhibition in soybean cell suspension cultures and in bacteria correlated with block in biosynthesis of valine, leucine, or isoleucine. Pestic Biochem Physiol 1985, 23(3):398.
31. Ray TB. Site of action of chlorsulfuron inhibition of valine and isoleucine biosynthesis in plants. Plant Physiol 1984, 75(3):827. 10.1104/pp.75.3.827, 1067001, 16663712.
32. Royuela M, Arrese-Igor C, Muñoz-Rueda A, Gonzalez-Murua C. In vitro and in vivo effects of chlorsulfuron in sensitive and tolerant plants. J Plant Physiol 1991, 139(2):235.
33. Höfgen R, Laber B, Schüttke I, Klonus A-K, Streber W, Pohlenz H-D. Repression of acetolactate synthase activity through antisense inhibition (Molecular and biochemical analysis of transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv Desiree) plants). Plant Physiol 1995, 107(2):469-477. 157149, 12228373.
34. Fakhoury AM, Lightfoot DA. Methods of using plants containing the gdhA gene. Patent 2013, US8383887.
35. Nolte S, Young B, Mungur R, Lightfoot D. The glutamate dehydrogenase gene gdhA increased the resistance of tobacco to glufosinate. Weed Res 2004, 44(4):335-339.
36. Ameziane R, Bernhard K, Lightfoot D. Expression of the bacterial gdhA gene encoding a NADPH glutamate dehydrogenase in tobacco affects plant growth and development. Plant and Soil 2000, 221(1):47-57.
37. Mungur R, Glass A, Goodenow D, Lightfoot DA. Metabolite fingerprinting in tranic Nicotiana tabacum altered by the Escherichia coli glutamate dehydrogenase gene. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology 2005, 2005(2):198-214. 10.1155/JBB.2005.198, 1184043, 16046826.
38. Zhao J, Williams CC, Last RL. Induction of Arabidopsis tryptophan pathway enzymes and camalexin by amino acid starvation, oxidative stress, and an abiotic elicitor. Plant Cell 1998, 10(3):359. 143997, 9501110.
39. Song JT, Lu H, Greenberg JT. Divergent roles in Arabidopsis thaliana development and defense of two homologous genes, aberrant growth and death2 and AGD2-LIKE DEFENSE RESPONSE PROTEIN1, encoding novel aminotransferases. Plant Cell 2004, 16(2):353. 10.1105/tpc.019372, 341909, 14729919.
40. Sembdner G, Atzorn R, Schneider G. Plant hormone conjugation. Plan Mol Biol 1994, 26(5):1459-1481.
41. Fonseca S, Chini A, Hamberg M, Adie B, Porzel A, Kramell R, Miersch O, Wasternack C, Solano R. (+)-7-iso-Jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine is the endogenous bioactive jasmonate. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5(5):344-350. 10.1038/nchembio.161, 19349968.
42. Park J-E, Park J-Y, Kim Y-S, Staswick PE, Jeon J, Yun J, Kim S-Y, Kim J, Lee Y-H, Park C-M. GH3-mediated auxin homeostasis links growth regulation with stress adaptation response in Arabidopsis. J Biol Chem 2007, 282(13):10036. 10.1074/jbc.M610524200, 17276977.
43. Liu Y, Schiff M, Dinesh-Kumar S. Virus-induced gene silencing in tomato. Plant J 2002, 31(6):777. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01394.x, 12220268.
44. Helliwell CA, Wesley SV, Wielopolska AJ, Waterhouse PM. High-throughput vectors for efficient gene silencing in plants. Funct Plant Biol 2002, 29(10):1217.
45. Hurst CD, Knight A, Bruce IJ. PCR detection of genetically modified soya and maize in foodstuffs. Mol Breed 1999, 5(6):579.
46. Løvdal T, Lillo C. Reference gene selection for quantitative real-time PCR normalization in tomato subjected to nitrogen, cold, and light stress. Anal Biochem 2009, 387(2):238. 10.1016/j.ab.2009.01.024, 19454243.
47. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of Relative Gene Expression Data Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR and the 2 - ΔΔCT Method. Methods 2001, 25(4):402-408. 10.1006/meth.2001.1262, 11846609.
48. Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS (4th edition) 2011, Australia: Allen & Unwin.