Class II malocclusion treatment with the herbst appliance in patients after the growth peak

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 38-45

  Alvares, José Carlos de Castro ^a   Cançado, Rodrigo Hermont ^a   Valarelli, Fabrício Pinelli ^a   de Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore ^b   Angheben, Christian Zamberlan ^a  

^a University of Toronto ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Angle class II malocclusion; Functional orthodontic appliance; Head circumference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ANGLE CLASS II MALOCCLUSION; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION STUDY; FUNCTIONAL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; HUMAN; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ANGLE CLASS II MALOCCLUSION; FUNCTIONAL ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OVERBITE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84892399714     PISSN: 21769451     EISSN: 21776709     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S2176-94512013000500008     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bakke M, Paulsen HU. Herbst treatment in late adolescence: clinical, electromyographic, kinesiographic, and radiographic analysis of one case. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11(4):397-407.
2. Baumrind S, Frantz RC. The reliability of head film measurements. 1. Landmark identification. Am J Orthod. 1971;60(2):111-27.
3. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience; 1940.
4. Hansen K, Pancherz H, Hagg U. Long-term effects of the Herbst appliance in relation to the treatment growth period: a cephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13(6):471-81.
5. Hirzel HC, Grewe JM. Activators: a practical approach. Am J Orthod. 1974;66(5):557-70.
6. Houston WJ. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod. 1983;83(5):382-90.
7. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;112(1):87-91.
8. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1979;76(4):423-42.
9. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982;82(2):104-13.
10. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance: its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985;87(1):1-20.
11. Pancherz H, Hagg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88(4):273-87.
12. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Eur J Orthod. 1986;8(4):215-28.
13. Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R. Treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance. World J Orthod. 2008;9(3):233-43.
14. Quaglio CL, Henriques RP, Henriques JFC, Freitas MRd. Classe II divisão 1 associada à deficiência transversal maxilar. Tratamento com disjuntor tipo Hyrax e aparelho de Herbst: relato de caso clínico. Rev Dental Press Ortod Ortop Facial. 2009;14(5):118-28.
15. Richardson A. A comparison of traditional and computerized methods of cephalometric analysis. Eur J Orthod. 1981;3(1):15-20.
16. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod. 1999;69(3):239-46.
17. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Orthognathic surgery and dentofacial orthopedics in adult Class II division 1 treatment: mandibular sagittal split osteotomy versus Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126(2):140-52; quiz 254-5.
18. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusions in early and late adulthood. A prospective cephalometric study of consecutively treated subjects. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(4):352-60.
19. Sidhu MS, Kharbanda OP, Sidhu SS. Cephalometric analysis of changes produced by a modified Herbst appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1995;22(1):1-12.
20. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod. 1984;86(1):1-13.
21. Wieslander L. Long-term effect of treatment with the headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Stability or relapse? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104(4):319-29.