Performance consequences of balanced scorecard adoptions: Claim for large-scale evidence and propositions for future research

Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting

Volumn 20, Issue , 2010, Pages 345-361

  Burkert, Michael ^a   Davila, Antonio ^b   Oyon, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^b IESE BUSINESS SCHOOL   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892379932     PISSN: 14793512     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1479-3512(2010)0000020015     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (46)

1. Anand, M., Sahay, B. S., & Saha, S. (2005). Balanced scorecard in Indian companies. Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 30(2), 11-25.
2. Andersson, C. O., & Seiving, E. (2008). Hot or not? - Scrutnizing the balanced scorecard from a management fad and fashion perspective (http://www.essays.se/essay/d22d7ef2ac/, pp. 1-49). Goteborg: University essay from Goteborgs universitet/Foretagsekonomiska institutionen.
3. Atkinson, A. A., Balakrishnan, R., Booth, P., Cote, J. M., Groot, T., Malmi, T., Roberts, H., Uliana, E., & Wu, A. (1997). New directions in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 79-108.
4. Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7/8), 675-698.
5. Banker, R. D., Chang, H., & Pizzini, M. J. (2004). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. The Accounting Review, 79(1), 1-23.
6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
7. Bessire, D., & Baker, C. R. (2005). The French tableau de bord and the American balanced scorecard: A critical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(6), 645-664.
8. Bourguignon, A., Malleret, V., & Norreklit, H. (2004). The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: The ideological dimension. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 107-134.
9. Bourne, M., Franco-Santos, M., Kennerly, M., & Martinez, V. (2005). Reflections on the role, use and benefits of corporate performance measurement in the UK. Measuring Business Excellence, 9(3), 36-40.
10. Chenhall, R. H. (2005). Integrative strategic performance measurement systems, strategic alignment of manufacturing, learning and strategic outcomes: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30(5), 395-422.
11. Chenhall, R. H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). Adoption and benefits of management accounting practices: An Australian study. Management Accounting Research, 9(1), 1-19.
12. Davila, A., & Foster, G. (2005). Management accounting systems adoption decisions: Evidence and performance implications from early-stage/startup companies. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1039-1068.
13. Davis, S., & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 135-153.
14. De Geuser, F., Mooraj, S., & Oyon, D. (2009). Does the balanced scorecard add value? Empirical evidence on its effect on performance. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 93-122.
15. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(1), 147-160.
16. Epstein, M. J., & Manzoni, J.-F. (1997). The balanced scorecard and tableau de bord: Translating strategy into action. Management Accounting: Official Magazine of Institute of Management Accountants, 79(2), 28-36.
17. Epstein, M. J., & Manzoni, J.-F. (1998). Implementing corporate strategy: From tableaux de bord to balanced scorecards. European Management Journal, 16(2), 190-203.
18. Gunther, T., & Gruning, M. (2002). Performance Measurement - Systeme im praktischen einsatz. Controlling, 14(1), 5-13.
19. Gupta, M., & King, R. R. (1997). An experimental investigation of the effect of cost information and feedback on product cost decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14(1), 99-127.
20. Henri, J.-F. (2007). A quantitative assessment of the reporting of structural equation modeling information: The case of management accounting research. Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 76-115.
21. Homburg, C., & Pflesser, C. (2000). A multiple-layer model of market-oriented organizational culture: Measurement issues and performance outcomes. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 449-462.
22. Hoque, J., & James, W. (2000). Linking balanced scorecard measures to size and market factors: Impact on organizational performance. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 12, 1-17.
23. Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (1998). Innovations in performance measurement: Trends and research implications. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 10, 205-238.
24. Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2001). Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32(1-3), 349-410.
25. Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Meyer, M. W. (2003a). Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review, 78(3), 725-758.
26. Ittner, C. D., Larcker, D. F., & Randall, T. (2003b). Performance implications of strategic performance measurement in financial services firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(7/8), 715-741.
27. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regressions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
28. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
29. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87-104.
30. Lebas, M. (1994). Managerial accounting in France - Overview of past tradition and current practice. European Accounting Review, 3(3), 471-487.
31. Lipe, M. G., & Salterio, S. E. (2000). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75(3), 283-298.
32. Lipe, M. G., & Salterio, S. E. (2002). A note on the judgmental effects of the balanced scorecard's information organization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(6), 531-540.
33. Malina, M. A., & Selto, F. H. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 47-90.
34. Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarrifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1031-1056.
35. Mooraj, S., Oyon, D., & Hostettler, D. (1999). The balanced scorecard: A necessary good or an unnecessary evil? European Management Journal, 17(5), 481-491.
36. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A., & Wixom, B. H. (2005). Antecedents of information and system quality: An empirical examination within the context of data warehousing. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 199-235.
37. Norreklit, H. (2003). The balanced scorecard: What is the score? A rhetorical analysis of the balanced scorecard. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 591-619.
38. Otley, D. (1999). Performance management: A framework for management control systems research. Management Accounting Research, 10(4), 363-382.
39. Podsakoff, P. M., McKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal ofApplied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
40. Rigby, D. (2007). Executive guide - Management tools 2007 (http://www.bain.com/ managementtools/ManagementToolsandTrends2007.pdf). Boston: Bain & Company Publishing.
41. Sandt, J. (2004). Management mit kennzahlen und kennzahlensystemen- bestandsaufnahme -Determinanten und erfolgsauswirkungen. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
42. Sibbet, D. (1997). 75 years of management ideas practices 1922-1997. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 2-12.
43. Silk, S. (1998). Automating the balanced scorecard. Management Accounting: Official Magazine of Institute of Management Accountants, 79(11), 38-44.
44. Smith, D., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2004). Structural equation modeling in management accounting research: Critical analysis and opportunities. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, 49-86.
45. Speckbacher, G., Bischof, J., & Pfeiffer, T. (2003). A descriptive analysis on the implementation of balanced scorecards in German-speaking countries. Management Accounting Research, 14(4), 361-388.
46. Williams, S. (2001). Drive your business forward with the balanced scorecard. Management Services, 45(6), 28-30.