The balanced scorecard: A necessary good or an unnecessary evil?

European Management Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 481-491

  Mooraj, Stella ^b   Oyon, Daniel ^b   Hostettler, Didier ^a  

^a Tetra Pak International SA   (Switzerland)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033211797     PISSN: 02632373     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0263-2373(99)00034-1     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Atkinson A.A., Waterhouse J.H., Well R.B. A stakeholder approach to strategic performance measurement. Sloan Management Review. Spring:1997;25-37.
2. Chapello, E. (1996) Les typologies des modes de contrôle et leurs facteurs de contingence: un essai d'organization de la littérature. Comptabilité - Contrôle - Audit, Tome 2, Vol. 2.
3. Collins, J.C. and Porras, J. I. (1994) Built to Last - Successful Habits of Visionary Companies. Harper Business, New York.
4. Dermer J., Lucas R. The illusion of managerial control. Accounting Organizations and Society. 11(6):1996;471-482.
5. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996a) The Balanced Scorecard - Translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
6. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996b) Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review 39(1).
7. Lorange, P., Scott Morton, M. and Ghoshal, S. (1986) Strategic Control, p. 10. West Publishing Company, St Paul.
8. Pugh, D. (1993) Understanding and managing organizational change. In Managing Change, eds C. Mabey and B. Mayon-White 2nd ed., pp. 108-112. The Open University.
9. Schendel, D. and Hofer, C. (1979) Strategic Management: A New View of Business Policy and Planning, p. 18. Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
10. Simons, R. (1990) Rethinking the role of systems in controlling strategy. Harvard Business School, note 9-191-091.