Should edentulous patients be constrained to removable complete dentures? the use of dental implants to improve the quality of life for edentulous patients

Gerodontology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 3-10

  Turkyilmaz, Ilser ^a   Company, Andrea M ^b   McGlumphy, Edwin A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Denture; Edentulous; Hybrid; Implant; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; HUMAN; MASTICATION; MOUTH DISEASE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, COMPLETE; HUMANS; MASTICATION; MOUTH, EDENTULOUS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 77149155949     PISSN: 07340664     EISSN: 17412358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-2358.2009.00294.x     Document Type: Review

References (45)

1. Marcus SE, Drury TF, Brown LJ et al. Tooth retention and tooth loss in the permanent dentition of adults: United States, 1988-1991. J Dent Res 1996 75 : 684 695.
2. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1996. 116th edn. Washington, DC : U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1996. p. 15, Table II, No. 14.
3. U.S. Bureau of the Census, Statistical Abstract of the United States: 1996. 116th edn. Washington, DC : U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1996. p. 17, Table II, No. 17.
4. Weintraub JA, Burt BA. Oral health status in the United States: tooth loss and edentulism. J Dent Educ 1985 49 : 368 376.
5. Mack F, Schwahn C, Feine JS et al. The impact of tooth loss on general health related to quality of life among elderly Pomeranians: results from the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP-O). Int J Prosthodont 2005 18 : 414 419.
6. Kapur KK. Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers. J Prosthetic Dent 1964 14 : 687 694.
7. Heath MR. The effect of maximum biting force and bone loss upon masticatory function and dietary selection of the elderly. Int Dent J 1982 32 : 345 356.
8. Allen PF, McMillan AS. A longitudinal study of quality of life outcomes in older adults requesting implant prostheses and complete removable dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003 14 : 173 179.
9. Wolff A, Gadre A, Begleiter A et al. Correlation between patient satisfaction with complete dentures and denture quality, oral condition, and flow rate of submandibular/sublingual salivary glands. Int J Prosthodont 2003 16 : 45 48.
10. Ikebe K, Matsuda K, Morii K et al. Association of masticatory performance with age, posterior occlusal contacts, occlusal force, and salivary flow in older adults. Int J Prosthodont 2006 19 : 475 481.
11. Koshino H, Hirai T, Ishijima T et al. Tongue motor skills and masticatory performance in adult dentates, elderly dentates, and complete denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1997 77 : 147 152.
12. Ikebe K, Amemiya M, Morii K et al. Association between oral stereognostic ability and masticatory performance in aged complete denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2007 20 : 245 250.
13. Allen F, McMillan A. Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002 13 : 320 326.
14. Garrett NR, Kapur KK, Jochen DG. Oral stereognostic ability and masticatory performance in denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 1994 7 : 567 573.
15. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E et al. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003 16 : 117 122.
16. Smith JSA. How dental conditions handicap the elderly. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1979 7 : 305 310.
17. Hogenius S, Berggren U, Blomberg S et al. Demographical, odontological, and psychological variables in individuals referred for osseointegrated dental implants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992 20 : 224 228.
18. Boerrigter EM, Stegenga B, Raghoebar GM et al. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparison with new complete dentures with or without preprosthetic surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995 53 : 1167 1173.
19. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D. A patient-based assessment of implant -stabilized and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2001 85 : 141 147.
20. Curtis DA, Plesh O, Miller AJ et al. A comparison of masticatory function in patients with or without reconstruction of the mandible. Head Neck 1997 19 : 287 296.
21. Heydecke G, Locker D, Awad MA et al. Oral and general health-related quality of life with conventional and implant dentures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003 31 : 161 168. (Pubitemid 37465436)
22. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002 15 : 446 450.
23. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA et al. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Gerodontology 2002 19 : 3 4.
24. Burns DR, Unger JW, Elswick RK Jr. et al. Prospective clinical evaluation of mandibular implant overdentures: part I - retention, stability, and tissue response. J Prosthet Dent 1995 73 : 354 363.
25. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: a randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003 16 : 390 396.
26. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren JI et al. Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997 26 : 263 267.
27. Walton JN. A randomized clinical trial comparing two mandibular implant overdenture designs: three-year prosthetic outcomes using a six-field protocol. Int J Prosthodont 2003 16 : 255 260.
28. Cune M, van Kampen F, van der Bilt A et al. Patient satisfaction and preference with magnet, bar-clip, and ball-socket retained mandibular implant overdentures: a crossover clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2005 18 : 99 105.
29. Heydecke G, Thomason JM, Lund JP et al. The impact of conventional and implant supported prostheses on social and sexual activities in edentulous adults Results from a randomized trial 2 months after treatment. J Dent 2005 33 : 649 657.
30. Visser A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ et al. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants. A 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005 16 : 19 25.
31. Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1998 59 : 59 63.
32. Friberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U et al. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000 2 : 184 189.
33. Friberg B, Jemt T. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of five TiUnite implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 90 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008 10 : 47 54.
34. Feine JS, de Grandmont P, Boudrias P et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: choice of prosthesis. J Dent Res 1994 73 : 1105 1111.
35. Stephan G, Vidot F, Noharet R et al. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparative pilot study of immediate loading versus delayed loading after two years. J Prosthet Dent 2007 97 : S138 S145.
36. Friberg B, Henningsson C, Jemt T. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of turned Brånemark System implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 152 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005 7 : 1 9.
37. Ostman PO, Hellman M, Sennerby L et al. Temporary implant-supported prosthesis for immediate loading according to a chair-side concept: technical note and results from 37 consecutive cases. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2008 10 : 71 77.
38. Turkyilmaz I, Tozum TF, Tumer C et al. A 2-year clinical report of patients treated with two loading protocols for mandibular overdentures: early versus conventional loading. J Periodontol 2006 77 : 1998 2004.
39. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Immediate and early implant loading protocols: a literature review of clinical studies. J Prosthet Dent 2005 94 : 242 258.
40. Ozan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomography-guided surgical stents: flapless versus conventional flapped surgery. J Oral Rehabil 2007 34 : 835 840.
41. Payne AG, Tawse-Smith A, Thompson WM et al. Early functional loading of unsplinted roughened surface implants with mandibular overdentures 2 weeks after surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5 : 143 153.
42. Brånemark PI, Engstrand P, Ohrnell LO et al. Brånemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999 1 : 2 16.
43. Engstrand P, Gröndahl K, Ohrnell LO et al. Prospective follow-up study of 95 patients with edentulous mandibles treated according to the Brånemark Novum concept. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003 5 : 3 10.
44. Engstrand P, Nannmark U, Martensson L et al. Brånemark Novum: prosthodontic and dental laboratory procedures for fabrication of a fixed prosthesis on the day of surgery. Int J Prosthodont 2001 14 : 303 309.
45. Tames R, McGlumphy E, El-Gendy T et al. The OSU frame: a novel approach to fabricating immediate load fixed-detachable prostheses. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004 62 (Suppl. 2 17 21.